Computational docking of antibody-antigen complexes, opportunities and pitfalls illustrated by influenza hemagglutinin

International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 226-251

  Pedotti, Mattia ^a   Simonelli, Luca ^a   Livoti, Elsa ^a   Varani, Luca ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN BIOMEDICINE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Antibody modeling; Antibody antigen complexes; Computational docking; Hemagglutinin; Influenza

Indexed keywords

EPITOPE; INFLUENZA VIRUS HEMAGGLUTININ; ANTIGEN ANTIBODY COMPLEX; HEMAGGLUTININ;

ACCURACY; ANTIBODY STRUCTURE; ANTIGEN ANTIBODY COMPLEX; ANTIGEN ANTIBODY REACTION; ANTIGEN BINDING; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR MODEL; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PREDICTION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; INFLUENZA VIRUS A; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES;

ANTIGEN-ANTIBODY COMPLEX; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HEMAGGLUTININS; HUMANS; INFLUENZA A VIRUS;

EID: 79251638148     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14220067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijms12010226     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Edelman, G.M.; Benacerraf, B.; Ovary, Z.; Poulik, M.D. Structural differences among antibodies of different specificities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1961, 47, 1751-1758.
2. Edelman, G.M.; Poulik, M.D. Studies on structural units of the gamma-globulins. J. Exp. Med. 1961, 113, 861-884.
3. Janin, J.; Henrick, K.; Moult, J.; Eyck, L.T.; Sternberg, M.J.; Vajda, S.; Vakser, I.; Wodak, S.J. CAPRI: a Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions. Proteins 2003, 52, 2-9.
4. Rini, J.M.; Schulze-Gahmen, U.; Wilson, I.A. Structural evidence for induced fit as a mechanism for antibody-antigen recognition. Science 1992, 255, 959-965.
5. Al-Lazikani, B.; Lesk, A.M.; Chothia, C. Standard conformations for the canonical structures of immunoglobulins. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 273, 927-948.
6. Chothia, C.; Lesk, A.M. Canonical structures for the hypervariable regions of immunoglobulins. J. Mol. Biol. 1987, 196, 901-917.
7. Tramontano, A.; Chothia, C.; Lesk, A.M. Framework residue 71 is a major determinant of the position and conformation of the second hypervariable region in the VH domains of immunoglobulins. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 175-182.
8. Chothia, C.; Lesk, A.M.; Levitt, M.; Amit, A.G.; Mariuzza, R.A.; Phillips, S.E.; Poljak, R.J. The predicted structure of immunoglobulin D1.3 and its comparison with the crystal structure. Science 1986, 233, 755-758.
9. Chothia, C.; Lesk, A.M.; Tramontano, A.; Levitt, M.; Smith-Gill, S.J.; Air, G.; Sheriff, S.; Padlan, E.A.; Davies, D.; Tulip, W.R.; et al. Conformations of immunoglobulin hypervariable regions. Nature 1989, 342, 877-883.
10. Chothia, C.; Novotny, J.; Bruccoleri, R.; Karplus, M. Domain association in immunoglobulin molecules. The packing of variable domains. J. Mol. Biol. 1985, 186, 651-663.
11. PIGS, Prediction of ImmunoGlobulin Structure. Available online: http://www.biocomputing.it/pigs (accessed on 4 January 2011).
12. Marcatili, P.; Rosi, A.; Tramontano, A. PIGS: automatic prediction of antibody structures. Bioinformatics 2008, 24, 1953-1954.
13. Morea, V. Antibody Modeling: Implications for Engineering and Design. Methods 2000, 20, 267-279.
14. Whitelegg, N.R.; Rees, A.R. WAM: an improved algorithm for modelling antibodies on the WEB. Protein Eng. 2000, 13, 819-824.
15. Altschul, S.F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E.W.; Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403-410.
16. Thompson, J.D.; Higgins, D.G.; Gibson, T.J. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4673-4680.
17. Morea, V.; Tramontano, A.; Rustici, M.; Chothia, C.; Lesk, A.M. Antibody structure, prediction and redesign. Biophys. Chem. 1997, 68, 9-16.
18. Morea, V.; Tramontano, A.; Rustici, M.; Chothia, C.; Lesk, A.M. Conformations of the third hypervariable region in the VH domain of immunoglobulins. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 275, 269-294.
19. Shirai, H.; Kidera, A.; Nakamura, H. Structural classification of CDR-H3 in antibodies. FEBS Lett. 1996, 399, 1-8.
20. Ponder, J.W.; Richards, F.M. Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J. Mol. Biol. 1987, 193, 775-791.
21. Sivasubramanian, A.; Sircar, A.; Chaudhury, S.; Gray, J.J. Toward high-resolution homology modeling of antibody FV regions and application to antibody-antigen docking. Proteins 2009, 74, 497-514.
22. Sircar, A.; Kim, E.T.; Gray, J.J. RosettaAntibody: antibody variable region homology modeling server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, W474-W479.
23. RosettaAntibody: FV Homology Modeling Server. Available online: http://antibody.graylab.jhu.edu/ (accessed on 4 January 2011).
24. Canutescu, A.A.; Dunbrack, R.L., Jr. Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure. Protein Sci. 2003, 12, 963-972.
25. Wang, C.; Schueler-Furman, O.; Baker, D. Improved side-chain modeling for protein-protein docking. Protein Sci. 2005, 14, 1328-1339.
26. Kortemme, T.; Morozov, A.V.; Baker, D. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 326, 1239-1259.
27. Lazaridis, T.; Karplus, M. Effective energy function for proteins in solution. Proteins 1999, 35, 133-152.
28. Dunbrack, R.L., Jr.; Cohen, F.E. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci. 1997, 6, 1661-1681.
29. Warshel, A.; Russell, S.T.; Churg, A.K. Macroscopic models for studies of electrostatic interactions in proteins: limitations and applicability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1984, 81, 4785-4789.
30. Davies, D.R.; Sheriff, S.; Padlan, E.A. Antibody-antigen complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 1988, 263, 10541-10544.
31. de la Paz, P.; Sutton, B.J.; Darsley, M.J.; Rees, A.R. Modelling of the combining sites of three anti-lysozyme monoclonal antibodies and of the complex between one of the antibodies and its epitope. EMBO J. 1986, 5, 415-425.
32. Jones, T.A.; Thirup, S. Using known substructures in protein model building and crystallography. EMBO J. 1986, 5, 819-822.
33. Coutre, S.E.; Stanford, J.M.; Hovis, J.G.; Stevens, P.W.; Wu, T.T. Possible three-dimensional backbone folding around antibody combining site of immunoglobulin MOPC167. J. Theor. Biol. 1981, 92, 417-434.
34. Moult, J.; James, M.N. An algorithm for determining the conformation of polypeptide segments in proteins by systematic search. Proteins 1986, 1, 146-163.
35. Bruccoleri, R.E.; Haber, E.; Novotny, J. Structure of antibody hypervariable loops reproduced by a conformational search algorithm. Nature 1988, 335, 564-568.
36. Bruccoleri, R.E.; Karplus, M. Prediction of the folding of short polypeptide segments by uniform conformational sampling. Biopolymers 1987, 26, 137-168.
37. Fine, R.M.; Wang, H.; Shenkin, P.S.; Yarmush, D.L.; Levinthal, C. Predicting antibody hypervariable loop conformations. II: Minimization and molecular dynamics studies of MCPC603 from many randomly generated loop conformations. Proteins 1986, 1, 342-362.
38. Stanford, J.M.; Wu, T.T. A predictive method for determining possible three-dimensional foldings of immunoglobulin backbones around antibody combining sites. J. Theor. Biol. 1981, 88, 421-439.
39. Halperin, I.; Ma, B.; Wolfson, H.; Nussinov, R. Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 2002, 47, 409-443.
40. Camacho, C.J.; Gatchell, D.W.; Kimura, S.R.; Vajda, S. Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins 2000, 40, 525-537.
41. Cheng, T.M.; Blundell, T.L.; Fernandez-Recio, J. PyDock: electrostatics and desolvation for effective scoring of rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins 2007, 68, 503-515.
42. Fernandez-Recio, J.; Abagyan, R.; Totrov, M. Improving CAPRI predictions: optimized desolvation for rigid-body docking. Proteins 2005, 60, 308-313.
43. Heifetz, A.; Eisenstein, M. Effect of local shape modifications of molecular surfaces on rigid-body protein-protein docking. Protein Eng. 2003, 16, 179-185.
44. Lorenzen, S.; Zhang, Y. Monte Carlo refinement of rigid-body protein docking structures with backbone displacement and side-chain optimization. Protein Sci. 2007, 16, 2716-2725.
45. Meng, E.C.; Gschwend, D.A.; Blaney, J.M.; Kuntz, I.D. Orientational sampling and rigid-body minimization in molecular docking. Proteins 1993, 17, 266-278.
46. Cheng, T.M.; Blundell, T.L.; Fernandez-Recio, J. Structural assembly of two-domain proteins by rigid-body docking. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9, 441.
47. Cherfils, J.; Bizebard, T.; Knossow, M.; Janin, J. Rigid-body docking with mutant constraints of influenza hemagglutinin with antibody HC19. Proteins 1994, 18, 8-18.
48. Clore, G.M. Accurate and rapid docking of protein-protein complexes on the basis of intermolecular nuclear overhauser enhancement data and dipolar couplings by rigid body minimization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 9021-9025.
49. Dell'Orco, D.; Seeber, M.; de Benedetti, P.G.; Fanelli, F. Probing fragment complementation by rigid-body docking: in silico reconstitution of calbindin D9k. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 1429-1438.
50. Fanelli, F.; Ferrari, S. Prediction of MEF2A-DNA interface by rigid body docking: a tool for fast estimation of protein mutational effects on DNA binding. J. Struct. Biol. 2006, 153, 278-283.
51. Gray, J.J.; Moughon, S.; Wang, C.; Schueler-Furman, O.; Kuhlman, B.; Rohl, C.A.; Baker, D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 331, 281-299.
52. Segal, D.; Eisenstein, M. The effect of resolution-dependent global shape modifications on rigid-body protein-protein docking. Proteins 2005, 59, 580-591.
53. Chen, R.; Li, L.; Weng, Z. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins 2003, 52, 80-87.
54. Gray, J.J.; Moughon, S.E.; Kortemme, T.; Schueler-Furman, O.; Misura, K.M.; Morozov, A.V.; Baker, D. Protein-protein docking predictions for the CAPRI experiment. Proteins 2003, 52, 118-122.
55. Hwang, H.; Vreven, T.; Pierce, B.G.; Hung, J.H.; Weng, Z. Performance of ZDOCK and ZRANK in CAPRI rounds 13-19. Proteins 2010, 78, 3104-3110.
56. Wiehe, K.; Pierce, B.; Mintseris, J.; Tong, W.W.; Anderson, R.; Chen, R.; Weng, Z. ZDOCK and RDOCK performance in CAPRI rounds 3, 4, and 5. Proteins 2005, 60, 207-213.
57. Wiehe, K.; Pierce, B.; Tong, W.W.; Hwang, H.; Mintseris, J.; Weng, Z. The performance of ZDOCK and ZRANK in rounds 6-11 of CAPRI. Proteins 2007, 69, 719-725.
58. Chaudhury, S.; Gray, J.J. Conformer selection and induced fit in flexible backbone protein-protein docking using computational and NMR ensembles. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 381, 1068-1087.
59. Lyskov, S.; Gray, J.J. The RosettaDock server for local protein-protein docking. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, W233-W238.
60. Schueler-Furman, O.; Wang, C.; Baker, D. Progress in protein-protein docking: atomic resolution predictions in the CAPRI experiment using RosettaDock with an improved treatment of side-chain flexibility. Proteins 2005, 60, 187-194.
61. Wang, C.; Schueler-Furman, O.; Andre, I.; London, N.; Fleishman, S.J.; Bradley, P.; Qian, B.; Baker, D. RosettaDock in CAPRI rounds 6-12. Proteins 2007, 69, 758-763.
62. Ma, X.H.; Li, C.H.; Shen, L.Z.; Gong, X.Q.; Chen, W.Z.; Wang, C.X. Biologically enhanced sampling geometric docking and backbone flexibility treatment with multiconformational superposition. Proteins 2005, 60, 319-323.
63. Wang, C.; Bradley, P.; Baker, D. Protein-protein docking with backbone flexibility. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 373, 503-519.
64. Moal, I.H.; Bates, P.A. Swarm Dock and the Use of Normal Modes in Protein-Protein Docking. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 3623-3648.
65. de Vries, S.J.; van Dijk, M.; Bonvin, A.M. The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 883-897.
66. Dominguez, C.; Boelens, R.; Bonvin, A.M. HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1731-1737.
67. Colwell, N.S.; Blinder, M.A.; Tsiang, M.; Gibbs, C.S.; Bock, P.E.; Tollefsen, D.M. Allosteric effects of a monoclonal antibody against thrombin exosite II. Biochemistry 1999, 38, 2610.
68. Huang, S.Y.; Zou, X. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking. Proteins 2007, 66, 399-421.
69. Sircar, A.; Chaudhury, S.; Kilambi, K.P.; Berrondo, M.; Gray, J.J. A generalized approach to sampling backbone conformations with RosettaDock for CAPRI rounds 13-19. Proteins 2010, 78, 3115-3123.
70. Sircar, A.; Gray, J.J. SnugDock: paratope structural optimization during antibody-antigen docking compensates for errors in antibody homology models. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2010, 6, e1000644.
71. Monto, A.S.; Ohmit, S.E. Seasonal influenza vaccines: evolutions and future trends. Expert Rev. Vaccines 2009, 8, 383-389.
72. Ivanova, V.T.; Burtseva, E.I.; Slepushkin, A.N.; Oskerko, T.A.; Varmanian, R.V. Variability of hemagglutinin from strains of influenza virus A (H3N2), isolated in Russian from 1989 to 1999. Vopr. Virusol. 2000, 45, 28-31.
73. Klimov, A.I.; Schrader, C.; Herrmann, B.; Seidel, W.; Dohner, L.; Ghendon Yu, Z. The variability of genes of influenza A (H3N2) virus strains isolated in the G.D.R. during the 1970-1978 epidemic seasons. Acta Virol. 1985, 29, 466-474.
74. Lopez-Galindez, C.; Lopez, J.A.; Melero, J.A.; de la Fuente, L.; Martinez, C.; Ortin, J.; Perucho, M. Analysis of genetic variability and mapping of point mutations in influenza virus by the RNase A mismatch cleavage method. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 3522-3526.
75. Sui, J.; Hwang, W.C.; Perez, S.; Wei, G.; Aird, D.; Chen, L.M.; Santelli, E.; Stec, B.; Cadwell, G.; Ali, M.; Wan, H.; Murakami, A.; Yammanuru, A.; Han, T.; Cox, N.J.; Bankston, L.A.; Donis, R.O.; Liddington, R.C.; Marasco, W.A. Structural and functional bases for broad-spectrum neutralization of avian and human influenza A viruses. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16, 265-273.
76. Ekiert, D.C.; Bhabha, G.; Elsliger, M.A.; Friesen, R.H.; Jongeneelen, M.; Throsby, M.; Goudsmit, J.; Wilson, I.A. Antibody recognition of a highly conserved influenza virus epitope. Science 2009, 324, 246-251.
77. Roy, A.; Kucukural, A.; Zhang, Y. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 725-738.
78. I-Tasser Online. Protein Structure and Function Predictions. Available online: http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/I-TASSER/ (accessed on 4 January 2011).
79. London, N.; Schueler-Furman, O. Assessing the energy landscape of CAPRI targets by FunHunt. Proteins 2007, 69, 809-815.
80. London, N.; Schueler-Furman, O. FunHunt: model selection based on energy landscape characteristics. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2008, 36, 1418-1421.
81. Ponomarenko, J.V.; Bourne, P.E. Antibody-protein interactions: benchmark datasets and prediction tools evaluation. BMC Struct. Biol. 2007, 7, 64.
82. Simonelli, L.; Beltramello, M.; Yudina, Z.; Macagno, A.; Calzolai, L.; Varani, L. Rapid structural characterization of human antibody-antigen complexes through experimentally validated computational docking. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 396, 1491-1507.
83. Johansson, B.E.; Kilbourne, E.D. Immunization with purified N1 and N2 influenza virus neuraminidases demonstrates cross-reactivity without antigenic competition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1994, 91, 2358-2361.
84. Mazurkova, N.A.; Isaeva, E.I.; Podcherniaeva, R. Peptide mapping of the monoclonal antibodies against the heavy chain hemagglutinin from influenza virus H3N2. Mol. Gen. Mikrobiol. Virusol. 2006, 4, 19-23.
85. Andrew C.R. Martin's Group. Pro Fit. Available online: http://www.bioinf.org.uk/software/profit/ (accessed on 4 January 2011).