Biologically enhanced sampling geometric docking and backbone flexibility treatment with multiconformational superposition

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 319-323

  Ma, Xiao Hui ^a   Li, Chun Hua ^a   Shen, Long Zhu ^a   Gong, Xin Qi ^a   Chen, Wei Zu ^a   Wang, Cun Xin ^a  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Active site; Backbone flexibility; Biologically enhanced sampling; Multiconformational superposition

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BINDING SITE; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; EXPERIMENT; GEOMETRY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SAMPLING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; ELECTROSTATICS; LIGANDS; MACROMOLECULAR SUBSTANCES; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN;

EID: 21644481788     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20577     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Wodak SJ, Janin J. Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. J Mol Biol 1978;124:323-342.
2. Janin J, Henrick K, Moult J, Eyck LT, Sternberg MJE, Vajda S, Vakser I, Wodak SJ. CAPRI: a critical assessment of predicted interactions. Proteins 2003;52:2-9.
3. Gabb HA, Jackson RM, Sternberg MJE. Modelling protein docking using shape complimentarity: electrostatics and biochemical information. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120.
4. Chen R, Li L, Weng Z. ZDOCK: an initial-stage protein-docking algorithm. Proteins 2003;52:80-87.
5. Abagyan RA, Totrov MM, Kuznetsov DA. ICM: a new method for structure modeling and design: applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation. J Comp Chem 1994;15:488-506.
6. Gray JJ, Moughon S, Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, Baker D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2003;331:281-299.
7. Smith GR, Sternberg MJE. Evaluation of the 3D-DOCK protein docking suite in rounds 1 and 2 of the CAPRI blind trial. Proteins 2003;52:74-79.
8. Chen R, Tong WW, Mintseris J, Li L, Weng Z. ZDOCK predictions for the CAPRI challenge. Proteins 2003;52:68-73.
9. Fernández-Recio F, Totrov M, Abagyan R. ICM-DISCO docking by global energy optimization with fully flexible side-chains. Proteins 2003;52:113-117.
10. Gray JJ, Moughon SE, Kortemme T, Schueler-Furman O, Misura KMS, Morozov AV, Baker D. Protein-protein docking prediction for the CAPRI experiment. Proteins 2003;52:118-122.
11. Méndez R, Leplae R, Maria LD, Wodak SJ. Assessment of blind predictions of protein-protein interactions: current status of docking methods. Proteins 2003;52:51-67.
12. Ben-Zeev E, Eisenstein M. Weighted geometric docking: incorporating external information in the rotation-translation scan. Proteins 2003;52:41-46.
13. Ehrlich LP, Nilges M, Wade RC. The impact of protein flexibility on protein-protein docking. Proteins 2005;58:126-133.
14. Gunasekaran K, Buyong Ma, Nussinov R. Is allostery an intrinsic property of all dynamic proteins? Proteins 2004;57:433-443.
15. Abagyan R, Totrov M. Biased probability Monte Carlo conformational searches and electrostatic calculations for peptides and proteins. J Mol Biol 1994;235:983-1002.
16. da Silva RA, Degrève L, Calin A. LMProt: an efficient algorithm for Monte Carlo sampling of protein conformational space. J Biophys 2004;87:1567-1577.
17. Li CH, Ma XH, Chen WZ, Wang CX. A protein-protein docking algorithm dependent on the type of the complexes. Protein Eng 2003;16:256-269.
18. Heifetz A, Eisenstein M. Effect of local shape modifications of molecular surfaces on rigid-body protein-protein docking. Protein Eng 2003;16:179-185.
19. Shoichet BK, Kuntz ID. Protein docking and complementarity. J Mol Biol 1991;221:327-346.
20. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vakser IA. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2195-2199.
21. Takagi J, Yang YT, Liu JH, Wang JH, Springer TA. Complex between nidogen and laminin fragments reveals a paradigmatic beta-propeller interface. Nature 2003;424:969-974.
22. Carvalho AL, Dias FMV, Prates JAM, Ferreira LMA, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ, Romao MJ, Fontes CMGA. Cellulosome assembly revealed by the crystal structure of the cohesin-dockerin complex. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2003;100:13809-13814.
23. Kerff F, Terrak M, Dominguez R. Protein phosphatase 1 targeting and regulation as revealed by the structure of a PP1-MYPT1 complex, to be published.
24. Graille M, Mora L, Buckingham RH, Van Tilbeurgh H, De Zamaroczy M. Structure inhibition of the colicin D tRNase by the tRNA-mimicking immunity protein. EMBO J 2004;23:1474-1482.
25. Eghiaian F, Grosclaude J, Lesceu S, Debey P, Doublet B, Treguer E, Rezaei H, Knossow M. Insight into the PrPC→PrPSc conversion from the structures of antibody-bound ovine prion scrapie-susceptibility variants. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2004;101:10254-10259.
26. Lindahl E, Hess B, van der Spoel D. GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J. Mol Mod 2001;7: 306-317.
27. Zhang C, Vasmatzis G, Cornette JL, DeLisi C. Determination of atomic desolvation energies from the structures of crystallized proteins. J Mol Biol 1997;267:707-726.
28. Kuhlman B, Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2000;97: 10383-10388.
29. Chen R, Mintseris J, Janin J, Weng Z. A protein-protein docking benchmark. Proteins 2003;52:88-91.
30. Stetefeld J, Mayer U, Timpl R, Huber R. Crystal structure of three consecutive laminin-type epidermal growth factor-like (LE) modules of laminin γ1 chain harboring the nidogen binding site. J Mol Biol 1996;257:644-657.
31. Lytle BL, Volkman BF, Westler WM, Heckman MP, David Wu JH. Solution structure of a type I dockerin domain, a novel prokaryotic, extracellular calcium-binding domain. J Mol Biol 2001;307: 745-753.
32. Egloff MP, Johnson DF, Moorhead G, Cohen PTW, Cohen P, Barford D. Structural basis for the recognition of regulatory subunits by the catalytic subunit of protein phosphatase 1. EMBO J 1997;16:1876-1887.
33. Masaki H, Ogawa T. The modes of action of colicins E5 and D, and related cytotoxic tRNases. Biochimie 2002;84:433-438.
34. Schmidt A, Gübitz GM, Kratky C. Xylan binding subsite mapping in the xylanase from Penicillium simplicissimum using xylooligosaccharides as cryo-protectant. Biochemistry 1999;38:2403-2412.
35. Flatman R, Russell Mclauchlan W, Juge N, Furniss C, Berrin JG, Hughes RK, Manzanares P, Ladbury JE, Obrien R, Willamson G. Interactions defining the specificity between fungal xylanases and the xylanase-inhibiting protein XIP-1 from wheat. Biochemistry 2002;365:773-781.
36. Tahir TA, Berrin JG, Flatman R, Roussel A, Roepstorff P, Williamson G, Juge N. Specific characterization of substrate and inhibitor binding sites of a glycosyl hydrolase family 11 xylanase from Aspergillus niger. J Biol Chem 2002;46:44035-44043.
37. Lichtarge O, Bourne HR, Cohen FE. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. J Mol Biol 1996;257:342-358.
38. Casari G, Sander C, Valencia A. A method to predict functional residues in proteins. Nat Struct Biol 1995;2:171-178.
39. Andrade MA, Casari G, Sander C, Valencia A. Classification of protein families and detection of the determinant residues with an improved self-organizing map. Biol Cybern 1997;76:441-450.