The effect of resolution-dependent global shape modifications on rigid-body protein-protein docking

Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics

Volumn 59, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 580-591

  Segal, Dadi ^a   Eisenstein, Miriam ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

Author keywords

Fourier space; Fourier transformations; Low pass filter; Shape complementarity; Shape descriptor; Unbound docking

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; ELECTRICITY; FOURIER TRANSFORMATION; GEOMETRY; HYDROPHOBICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

BINDING SITES; ELECTROSTATICS; ENZYMES; FOURIER ANALYSIS; KINETICS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 17844388860     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.20432     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Wodak SJ, Janin J. Computer analysis of protein-protein interaction. J Mol Biol 1978;124:323-342.
2. Kuntz ID, Blaney JM, Oatley SJ, Langridge R, Ferrin TE. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 1982;161:269-288.
3. Jones AT, Kleywegt GJ. CASP3 comparative modeling evaluation. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:30-46.
4. Orengo CA, Bray JE, Hubbard T, LoConte L, Sillitoe I. Analysis and assessment of ab initio three-dimensional prediction, secondary structure, and contacts prediction. Proteins 1999;Suppl 3:149-170.
5. Tramontano A, Morea V. Assessment of homology-based predictions in CASP5. Proteins 2003;Suppl 6:352-368.
6. Eisenstein M, Katchalski-Katzir E. On proteins, grids, correlations, and docking. C R Biol 2004;327:409-420.
7. Katchalski-Katzir E, Shariv I, Eisenstein M, Friesem AA, Aflalo C, Vakser LA. Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:2195-2199.
8. Heifetz A, Katchalski-Katzir E, Eisenstein M. Electrostatics in protein-protein docking. Protein Sci 2002;11:571-587.
9. Berchanski A, Shapira B, Eisenstein M. Hydrophobic complementarity in protein-protein docking. Proteins 2004;56:130-142.
10. Ben-Zeev E, Eisenstein M. Weighted geometric docking: incorporating external information in the rotation-translation scan. Proteins 2003;52:24-27.
11. Eisenstein M, Shariv I, Koren G, Friesem AA, Katchalski-Katzir E. Modeling supra-molecular helices: extension of the molecular surface recognition algorithm and application to the protein coat of the tobacco mosaic virus. J Mol Biol 1997;266:135-143.
12. Eisenstein M, Katchalski-Katzir E. Geometric recognition as a tool for predicting structures of molecular complexes. Lett Pept Sci 1998;5:365-369.
13. Heifetz A, Eisenstein M. Effect of local shape modifications of molecular surfaces on rigid-body protein-protein docking. Protein Eng 2003;16:179-185.
14. Gerstein M. A resolution-sensitive procedure for comparing protein surfaces and its application to the comparison of antigen-combining sites. Acta Crystallogr A 1992;48:271-276.
15. Zhang D, Lu G. Shape-based image retrieval using generic Fourier descritor. Signal Processing: IMAGE communication 2002;17:825-848.
16. Delibasis K, Undrill PE, Cameron GG. Designing texture filters with genetic algorithms: an application to medical images. Signal Processing 1997;57:19-33.
17. Delsol C, Hodges K. Use of Fourier shape descriptors to identify mid-latitude weather systems. Proc SPIE 2002;4541:352-360.
18. Vakser IA. Protein docking for low-resolution structures. Protein Eng 1995;8:371-377.
19. Vakser IA. Low-resolution docking: Prediction of complexes for underdetermined structures. Biopolymers 1996;39:455-464.
20. Vakser IA, Matar OG, Lam CF. A systematic study of low-resolution recognition in protein-protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:8477-8482.
21. Tovchigrechko A, Wells CA, Vakser IA. Docking of protein models. Protein Sci 2002;11:1888-1896.
22. Ritchie DW. Evaluation of protein docking predictions using Hex 3.1 in CAPRI rounds 1 and 2. Proteins 2003;52:98-106.
23. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:235-242.
24. Levitt M, Gerstein M. A unified statistical framework for sequence comparison and structure comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:5913-5920.
25. Huang Q, Wang Z, Li Y, Liu S, Tang Y. Refined 1.8 Å resolution crystal structure of the porcine epsilon-trypsin. Biochim Biophys Acta 1994;1209:77-82.
26. Song HK, Suh SW. Kunitz-type soybean trypsin inhibitor revisited: refined structure of its complex with porcine trypsin reveals an insight into the interaction between a homologous inhibitor from Erythrina caffra and tissue-type plasminogen activator. J Mol Biol 1998;275:347-363.
27. Buckle AM, Henrick K, Fersht AR. Crystal structural analysis of mutations in the hydrophobic cores of barnase. J Mol Biol 1993;234:847-860.
28. Buckle AM, Schreiber G, Fersht AR. Protein-protein recognition: crystal structural analysis of a barnase- barstar complex at 2.0-Å resolution. Biochemistry 1994;33(30):8878-8889.
29. Lubienski MJ, Bycroft M, Freund SM, Fersht AR. Three-dimensional solution structure and 13C assignments of barstar using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Biochemistry 1994;33:8866-8877.
30. Fujinaga M, Sielecki AR, Read RJ, Ardelt W, Laskowski M, James MN. Crystal and molecular structures of the complex of alpha-chymotrypsin with its inhibitor turkey ovomucoid third domain at 1.8 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 1987;195:397-418.
31. Blevins RA, Tulinsky A. The refinement and the structure of the dimer of alpha-chymotrypsin at 1.67-Å resolution. J Biol Chem 1985;260:4264-4275.
32. Harel M, Kleywegt GJ, Ravelli RB, Silman I, Sussman JL. Crystal structure of an acetylcholinesterase-fasciculin complex: Interaction of a three-fingered toxin from snake venom with its target. Structure 1995;3:1355-1366.
33. LeDu MH, Housset D, Marchot P, Bougis PE, Navaza J, Fontecil-laCamps, C. Structure of fasciculin 2 from green mamba snake venom: evidence for unusual loop flexibility. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1992;52:87.
34. Marquart M, Walter J, Deisenhofer J, Bode W, Huber, R. The geometry of the reactive site and of the peptide groups in trypsin, trypsinogen and its complexes with inhibitors. Acta Crystallogr B Biol Crystallogr 1983;39:480.
35. Walter J, Steigemann W, Singh TP, Bartunik H, Bode W, Huber R. On the disordered activation domain in trypsinogen: chemical labelling and low-temperature crystallography. Acta Crystallogr B Biol Crystallogr 1982;38:1462-1472.
36. McPhalen CA, James MN. Structural comparison of two serine proteinase-protein inhibitor complexes: eglin-c-subtilisin Carlsberg and CI-2-subtilisin Novo. Biochemistry 1988;27:6582-6598.
37. Gros P, Fujinaga M, Dijkstra BW, Kalk KH, Hol WGJ. Crystallographic refinement by incorporation of molecular dynamics. The thermostable serine protease thermitase complexed with eglin-c. Acta Crystallogr B Biol Crystallogr 1994;45:488-499.
38. Teplyakov AV, Kuranova IP, Harutyunyan EH, Vainshtein BK, Frommel C, Hohne WE, Wilson KS. Crystal structure of thermitase at 1.4 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 1990;214:261-279.
39. Strynadka NC, Adachi H, Jensen SE, Johns K, Sielecki A, Betzel C, Sutoh K, James MN. Molecular structure of the acyl-enzyme intermediate in beta-lactam hydrolysis at 1.7 Å resolution. Nature 1992;359:700-705.
40. Strynadka NC, Jensen SE, Johns K, Blanchard H, Page M, Matagne A, Frere JM, James MN. Structural and kinetic characterization of a beta-lactamase- inhibitor protein. Nature 1994;368:657-660.
41. Strynadka NC, Jensen SE, Alzari PM, James MN. A potent new mode of beta-lactamase inhibition revealed by the 1.7 Å X-ray crystallographic structure of the TEM-1-BLIP complex. Nat Struct Biol 1996;3:290-297.
42. Chen L, Durley RC, Mathews FS, Davidson VL. Structure of an electron transfer complex: methylamine dehydrogenase, amicyanin, and cytochrome c551i. Science 1994;264:86-90.
43. Chen L, Doi M, Durley RC, Chistoserdov AY, Lidstrom ME, Davidson VL, Mathews FS. Refined crystal structure of methylamine dehydrogenase from Paracoccus denitrificans at 1.75 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 1998;276:131-149.
44. Durley R, Chen L, Lim LW, Mathews FS, Davidson VL. Crystal structure analysis of amicyanin and apoamicyanin from Paracoccus denitrificans at 2.0 A and 1.8 Å resolution. Protein Sci 1993;2:739-752.
45. van de Locht A, Bode W, Huber R, Le Bonniec BF, Stone SR, Esmon CT, Stubbs MT. The thrombin E192Q-BPTI complex reveals gross structural rearrangements: implications for the interaction with antithrombin and thrombomodulin. Embo J 1997;16:2977-2984.
46. Rydel TJ, Tulinsky A, Bode W, Huber R. Refined structure of the hirudin-thrombin complex. J Mol Biol 1991;221:583-601.
47. Braden BC, Fields BA, Ysern X, Dall'Acqua W, Goldbaum FA, Poljak RJ, Mariuzza RA. Crystal structure of an Fv-Fv idiotope-anti-idiotope complex at 1.9 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 1996;264:137-151.
48. Bhat TN, Bentley GA, Boulot G, Greene MI, Tello D, Dall'Acqua W, Souchon H, Schwarz FP, Mariuzza RA, Poljak RJ. Bound water molecules and conformational stabilization help mediate an antigen-antibody association. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;91:1089-1093.
49. Wilson KP, Malcolm BA, Matthews BW. Structural and thermodynamic analysis of compensating mutations within the core of chicken egg white lysozyme. J Biol Chem 1992;267:10842-10849.
50. Prasad L, Waygood EB, Lee JS, Delbaere LT. The 2.5 Å resolution structure of the jel42 Fab fragment/HPr complex. J Mol Biol 1998;280:829-845.
51. Jia Z, Quail JW, Waygood EB, Delbaere LT. The 2.0-Å resolution structure of Escherichia coli histidine-containing phosphocarrier protein HPr. A redetermination. J Biol Chem 1993;268:22490-22501.
52. Padlan EA, Silverton EW, Sheriff S, Cohen GH, Smith-Gill SJ, Davies DR. Structure of an antibody-antigen complex: crystal structure of the HyHEL-10 Fab-lysozyme complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989;86:5938-5942.
53. Cohen GH, Sheriff S, Davies DR. Refined structure of the monoclonal antibody HyHEL-5 with its antigen hen egg-white lysozyme. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1996;52:315.
54. Huang M, Syed R, Stura EA, Stone MJ, Stefanko RS, Ruf W, Edgington TS, Wilson IA. The mechanism of an inhibitory antibody on TF-initiated blood coagulation revealed by the crystal structures of human tissue factor, Fab 5G9 and TF.G9 complex. J Mol Biol 1998;275:873-894.
55. Harlos K, Martin DM, O'Brien DP, Jones EY, Stuart DI, Polikarpov I, Miller A, Tuddenham EG, Boys CW. Crystal structure of the extracellular region of human tissue factor. Nature 1994;370:662-666.
56. Holmes MA, Buss TN, Foote J. Conformational correction mechanisms aiding antigen recognition by a humanized antibody. J Exp Med 1998;187:479-485.
57. Holmes MA, Foote J. Structural consequences of humanizing an antibody. J Immunol 1997;158:2192-2201.
58. Walsh MA, Schneider TR, Sieker LC, Dauter Z, Lamzin VS, Wilson KS. Refinement of triclinic hen egg-white lysozyme at atomic resolution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 1998;54:522-546.
59. Li Y, Li H, Smith-Gill SJ, Mariuzza RA. Three-dimensional structures of the free and antigen-bound Fab from monoclonal antilysozyme antibody HyHEL-63. Biochemistry 2000;39:6296-6309.
60. Braden BC, Souchon H, Eisele JL, Bentley GA, Bhat TN, Navaza J, Poljak RJ. Three-dimensional structures of the free and the antigen-complexed Fab from monoclonal anti-lysozyme antibody D44.1. J Mol Biol 1994;243:767-781.
61. Mylvaganam SE, Paterson Y, Getzoff ED. Structural basis for the binding of an anti-cytochrome c antibody to its antigen: crystal structures of FabE8-cytochrome c complex to 1.8 Å resolution and FabE8 to 2.26 Å resolution. J Mol Biol 1998;281:301-322.
62. Bushnell GW, Louie GV, Brayer GD. High-resolution three-dimensional structure of horse heart cytochrome c. J Mol Biol 1990;214:585-595.
63. Arold S, Franken P, Strub MP, Hoh F, Benichou S, Benarous R, Dumas C. The crystal structure of HIV-1 Nef protein bound to the Fyn kinase SH3 domain suggests a role for this complex in altered T cell receptor signaling. Structure 1997;5:1361-1372.
64. Noble ME, Musacchio A, Saraste M, Courtneidge SA, Wierenga RK. Crystal structure of the SH3 domain in human Fyn; comparison of the three-dimensional structures of SH3 domains in tyrosine kinases and spectrin. Embo J 1993;12:2617-2624.
65. Welch M, Chinardet N, Mourey L, Birck C, Samama JP. Structure of the CheY-binding domain of histidine kinase CheA in complex with CheY. Nat Struct Biol 1998;5:25-29.
66. Bellsolell L, Prieto J, Serrano L, Coll M. Magnesium binding to the bacterial chemotaxis protein CheY results in large conformational changes involving its functional surface. J Mol Biol 1994;238:489-495.
67. Scheffzek K, Ahmadian MR, Kabsch W, Wiesmuller L, Lautwein A, Schmitz F, Wittinghofer A. The Ras-RasGAP complex: structural basis for GTPase activation and its loss in oncogenic Ras mutants. Science 1997;277:333-338.
68. Scheffzek K, Lautwein A, Kabsch W, Ahmadian MR, Wittinghofer A. Crystal structure of the GTPase-activating domain of human p120GAP and implications for the interaction with Ras. Nature 1996;384:591-596.
69. Pai EF, Krengel U, Petsko GA, Goody RS, Kabsch W, Wittinghofer A. Refined crystal structure of the triphosphate conformation of H-ras p21 at 1.35 Å resolution: implications for the mechanism of GTP hydrolysis. Embo J 1990;9:2351-2359.
70. Creighton TE. Protein structures and molecular properties. New York: Freeman; 1997. p 157-167.