Use of fluorescent microorganisms to perform in vivo and in situ local characterization of microbial deposits

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 369, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 30-39

  Beaufort, Sandra ^a   Alfenore, Sandrine ^b   Lafforgue, Christine ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b UMR792 INGÉNIERIE DES SYSTÈMES BIOLOGIQUES ET DES PROCÉDÉS   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Confocal microscopy; Fluorescence; In situ; Microbial deposit; Structure

Indexed keywords

CALCULATED VALUES; CARMAN-KOZENY EQUATION; DEAD END MICROFILTRATION; DEPOSIT CHARACTERISTICS; FILTRATION CELL; FILTRATION PERFORMANCE; FLUORESCENT CELLS; IN-SITU; IN-VIVO; MACROSCOPIC MEASUREMENTS; MEMBRANE SURFACE; MICROBIAL DEPOSIT; MICROSCOPIC LEVELS; MODEL SUSPENSION; NON DESTRUCTIVE; STRUCTURE; VISUALISATION; LOCAL OBSERVATIONS; MICROBIAL DEPOSITS; SITU CHARACTERISATION;

CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; FLUORESCENCE; MICROFILTRATION; MICROORGANISMS; VISUALIZATION; YEAST; STRUCTURE (COMPOSITION);

DEPOSITS;

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; RED FLUORESCENT PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; AUTOFLUORESCENCE; CELL CULTURE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FILTRATION; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; HYDRODYNAMICS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IN VIVO STUDY; MEMBRANE REACTOR; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROBIAL MORPHOLOGY; MICROFILTRATION; NONHUMAN; PLASMID; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SURFACE TENSION; BACTERIUM; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DRY MASS; FLOW MEASUREMENT; FLUORESCENCE; MICROBIAL BIOMASS; MICROBIAL GROWTH; SURFACE PROPERTY; SUSPENSION; THICKNESS; YEAST;

EID: 79251622032     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.023     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ahluwalia S.S., Goyal D. Microbial and plant derived biomass for removal of heavy metals from wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98:2243-2257.
2. 2+ removal by genetically engineered Escherichia coli in a hollow fiber bioreactor. Biotechnol. Prog. 1998, 14:667-671.
3. Congeevaram S., Dhanarani S., Park J., Dexilin M., Thamaraiselvi K. Biosorption of chromium and nickel by heavy metal resistant fungal and bacterial isolates. J. Hazard. Mater. 2007, 146:270-277.
4. Larsen P., Eriksen P.S., Lou M.A., Thomsen T.R., Kong Y.H., Nielsen J.L., Nielsen P.H. Floc-forming properties of polyphosphate accumulating organisms in activated sludge. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 54:257-265.
5. Li H., Yang M., Zhang Y., Yu T., Kamagata Y. Nitrification performance and microbial community dynamics in a submerged membrane bioreactor with complete sludge retention. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 123:60-70.
6. Chang I.-S., Le Clech P., Jefferson B., Judd S. Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Eng. 2002, 28:1018-1029.
7. Le-Clech P., Chen V., Fane A.G. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 284:17-53.
8. Wang Z., Wu Z., Tang S. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 2009, 43:2504-2512.
9. Drews A., Lee C.-H., Kraume M. Membrane fouling - a review on the role of EPS. Desalination 2006, 200:186-188.
10. Nakanishi K., Tadokoro T., Matsuno R. On the specific resistance of cakes of microorganisms. Chem. Eng. Commun. 1987, 62:187-201.
11. Hamachi M., Mietton-Peuchot M. Experimental investigations of cake characteristics in crossflow microfiltration. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1999, 54:4023-4030.
12. Mota M., Teixeira J.A., Yelshin A. Influence of cell-shape on the cake resistance in dead-end and cross-flow filtrations. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2002, 27:137-144.
13. Foley G. A review of factors affecting filter cake properties in dead-end microfiltration of microbial suspensions. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 274:38-46.
14. Chen V., Li H., Fane A.G. Non-invasive observation of synthetic membrane processes - a review of methods. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 241:23-44.
15. Li H., Fane A.G., Coster H.G.L., Vigneswaran S. Direct observation of particle deposition on the membrane surface during crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 149:83-97.
16. Hamachi M., Cabassud M., Davin A., Mietton Peuchot M. Dynamic modelling of crossflow microfiltration of bentonite suspension using recurrent neural networks. Chem. Eng. Process. 1999, 38:203-210.
17. Chen V., Fane A.G., Madaeni S., Wenten I.G. Particle deposition during membrane filtration of colloids: transition between concentration polarization and cake formation. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 125:109-122.
18. Zhang Y.P., Fane A.G., Law A.W.K. Critical flux and particle deposition of bidisperse suspensions during crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 282:189-197.
19. Keskinler B., Yildiz E., Erhan E., Dogru M., Bayhan Y.K., Akay G. Crossflow microfiltration of low concentration non-living yeast suspensions. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 233:59-69.
20. Li H., Fane A.G., Coster H.G.L., Vigneswaran S. Observation of deposition and removal behaviour of submicron bacteria on the membrane surface during crossflow microfiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 217:29-41.
21. Ivanov V., Tay J.H., Tay S.T., Jiang H.L. Removal of micro-particles granules used for aerobic wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 50:147-154.
22. Boissier B., Lutin F., Moutounet M., Vernhet A. Particles deposition during the cross-flow microfiltration of red wines-incidence of the hydrodynamic conditions and the yeast to fines ratio. Chem. Eng. Process.: Process intensification 2008, 47:276-286.
23. Chen C.L., Liu W.T., Chong M.L., Wong M.T., Ong S.L., Seah H., Ng W.J. Community structure of microbial biofilms associated with membrane-based water purification processes as revealed using a polyphasic approach. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 63:466-473.
24. Weber S.D., Ludwig W., Schleifer K.H., Fried J. Microbial composition and structure of aerobic granular sewage biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73:6233-6240.
25. Ping Chu H., Li X.Y. Membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor (MBR): sludge cake formation and fouling characteristics. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2005, 90:323-331.
26. Crespo J.P.S.G., Trotin M.D., Hough D., Howell J.A. Use of fluorescence labelling to monitor protein fractionation by ultrafiltration under controlled permeate flux. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 155:209-230.
27. Moter A., Göbel U.B. Fluorescence in situ-hybridization (FISH) for direct visualization of microorganisms. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2000, 41:85-112.
28. Chudakov D.M., Lukyanov S., Lukyanov K.A. Fluorescent proteins as a toolkit for in vivo imaging. Trends Biotechnol. 2005, 23:605-613.
29. Dufour P., Dufour S., Castonguay A., McCarthy N., De Koninck Y. Microscopie à deux photons pour l'imagerie cellulaire fonctionnelle: avantages et enjeux ou un photon c'est bien... mais deux c'est mieux. Médecine/Science 2006, 22:837-844.
30. Tolker-Nielsen T., Brinch U.C., Ragas P.C., Andersen J.B., Jacobsen C.S., Molin S. Development and dynamics of Pseudomonas sp. biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182:6482-6489.
31. Cormack B.P., Bertram G., Ergeton M., Gow N.A., Falkow S., Brown A.J. Yeast enhanced green fluorescent protein (yEGFP) a reporter of gene expression in Candida albicans. Microbiology 1997, 143:303-311.
32. Heim R., Prasher D.C., Tsien R.Y. Wavelength mutations and posttranslational autoxidation of green fluorescent protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91:12501-12504.
33. Hughes D., Tirlapur U.K., Field R., Cui Z. In situ 3D characterization of membrane fouling by yeast suspensions using two-photon femtosecond near infrared non-linear optical imaging. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 280:124-133.
34. Xu-Jiang Y., Dodds J., Leclerc D. Cake characteristics in crossflow and dead-end microfiltration. Filtr. Sep. 1995, 32:795-798.
35. Tanaka T., Abe K.-I., Nakanishi K. Shear-induced arrangement of cells in cake during crossflow filtration in Escherichia coli cells. Biotechnol. Tech. 1994, 8:57-60.
36. Tanaka T., Usui K., Kouda K., Nakanishi K. Filtration behaviors of rod-shaped bacterial broths in unsteady-state phase of cross-flow filtration. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 1996, 29:973-981.
37. McCarthy A., Conroy H., Walsh P.K., Foley G. The effect of pressure on the specific resistance of yeast filter cakes during dead-end filtration in the range 30-500kPa. Biotechnol. Tech. 1998, 12:909-912.
38. McGuire I., Coyle K., Foley G. Specific cake resistance of yeast suspensions measured by dynamic and steady state methods. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 344:14-16.
39. Geissler S., Werner U. Dynamic model of crossflow microfiltration in flat-channel systems under laminar flow conditions. Filtr. Sep. 1999, 32:533-537.
40. Yu A.B., Zou R.P., Standish N. Modifying the linear packing model for predicting the porosity of nonspherical particle mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35:3730-3741.
41. Fane A.G., Fell C.J.D., Hodgson P.H., Marshall K.C. Microfiltration of biomass and biofluids: effects of membrane morphology and operating conditions. Filtr. Sep. 1991, 28:332-340.
42. McCarthy A., O'Shea D.G., Murray N.T., Walsh P.K., Foley G. Effect of cell morphology on dead-end filtration of the dimorphic yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus var. marxianus NRRLy2415. Biotechnol. Prog. 1998, 1:279-285.
43. Shimizu Y., Shimodera K.-I., Watanabe A. Cross-flow microfiltration of bacterial cells. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1993, 76:493-500.