Ensemble classification of paired data

Computational Statistics and Data Analysis

Volumn 55, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1933-1941

  Adler, Werner ^a   Brenning, Alexander ^b   Potapov, Sergej ^a   Schmid, Matthias ^a   Lausen, Berthold ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ensemble classification; Glaucoma diagnosis; Paired data

Indexed keywords

BUNDLING METHOD; ENSEMBLE CLASSIFICATION; GLAUCOMA DIAGNOSIS; GRADIENT BOOSTING; HEALTHY CONTROLS; INDIVIDUAL TREE; LINEAR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS; MISCLASSIFICATION RATES; PAIRED DATA; RANDOM FORESTS; REPEATED MEASUREMENTS; RESAMPLING; SIMULATION MODEL; SIMULATION RESULT;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION TREES; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS;

OPHTHALMOLOGY;

EID: 79251593441     PISSN: 01679473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2010.11.017     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. W. Adler, T. Hothorn, and B. Lausen Simulation based analysis of automated classification of medical images Methods of Information in Medicine 43 2004 150 155
2. W. Adler, and B. Lausen Bootstrap estimated true and false positive rates and roc curve Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 53 2009 718 729
3. W. Adler, A. Peters, and B. Lausen Comparison of classifiers applied to confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy data Methods of Information in Medicine 47 2008 38 46
4. L. Breiman Bagging predictors Machine Learning 24 2 1996 123 140
5. L. Breiman Random forests Machine Learning 45 1 2001 5 32
6. Breiman, L., Cutler, A., Liaw, A., Wiener, M., 2008. R package randomforest: Breiman and cutlers random forests for classification and regression. http://cran.r-project.org/.
7. A. Brenning Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Science 5 2005 853 862
8. Brenning, A., Kaden, K., Itzerott, S., 2006. Comparing classifiers for crop identification based on multitemporal landsat tm/etm data, in: Proceedings, Second Workshop of the EARSeL Special Interest Group Remote Sensing of Land Use and Land Cover, EARSeL-LULC, Bonn, Germany, 2830 Sep. 2006, pp. 6471.
9. A. Brenning, and B. Lausen Estimating error rates in the classification of paired organs Statistics in Medicine 27 2008 4515 4531
10. P. Bhlmann, and T. Hothorn Boosting algorithms: regularization, prediction and model fitting (with discussion) Statistical Science 22 2007 477 522
11. P. Bhlmann, and B. Yu Analyzing bagging The Annals of Statistics 30 2002 927 961
12. K.W. De Bock, K. Coussement, and D. Van den Poel Ensemble classification based on generalized additive models Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 54 2010 1535 1546
13. J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine The Annals of Statistics 29 2001 1189 1232
14. Hothorn, T., Bhlmann, P., Kneib, T., Schmid, M., 2009. R package mboost: model-based boosting R package version 1.1-2. http://cran.r-project.org/.
15. T. Hothorn, and B. Lausen Bagging tree classifiers for laser scanning images: a data- and simulation-based strategy Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 27 2003 65 79
16. T. Hothorn, and B. Lausen Double-bagging: combining classifiers by bootstrap aggregation Pattern Recognition 36 6 2003 1303 1309
17. T. Hothorn, and B. Lausen Bundling classifiers by bagging trees Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 49 2005 1068 1078
18. N. Iranpanah, M. Mohammadzadeh, and C.C. Taylor A comparison of block and semi-parametric bootstrap methods for variance estimation in spatial statistics Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 55 2011 578 587
19. Y.V. Karpievitch, E.G. Hill, A.P. Leclerc, A.R. Dabney, and J.S. Almeida An introspective comparison of random forest-based classifiers for the analysis of cluster-correlated data by way of RF++ PLoS ONE 4 9 2009 e7087
20. J. Katz, S. Zeger, and K. Liang Appropriate statistical methods to account for similarities in binary outcomes between fellow eyes Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 35 1994 2461 2465
21. C.Y. Mardin, T. Hothorn, A. Peters, A.G. Jnemann, N.X. Nguyen, and B. Lausen New glaucoma classification method based on standard HRT parameters by bagging classification trees Journal of Glaucoma 12 2003 340 346
22. P. Martus Statistical methods for the evaluation of diagnostic measurements concerning paired organs Statistics in Medicine 19 2000 525 540
23. P. Martus A measurement model of disease damage in paired organs Biometrical Journal 43 2001 927 940
24. P. Martus GEE approaches to marginal regression models for medical diagnostic tests Statistics in Medicine 23 2004 1377 1398
25. Peters, A., Hothorn, T., 2008. R package ipred: improved predictive models by indirect classification and bagging for classification, regression and survival problems as well as resampling based estimators of prediction error. http://cran.r-project.org/.
26. Potapov, S., Adler, W., Lausen, B., 2009. R package daim R package version 1.0.0. http://cran.r-project.org/.
27. W. Ray, and D. O'Doy Statistical analysis of multi-eye data in ophthalmic research Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 26 1985 1186 1188
28. R Development Core Team, 2009. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org.
29. L. Rokach Taxonomy for characterizing ensemble methods in classification tasks: a review and annotated bibliography Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 53 2009 4046 4072
30. B. Rosner Multivariate methods in ophthalmology with application to other paired-data situations Biometrics 40 1984 1025 1035
31. N. Swindale, G. Stjepanovic, A. Chin, and F. Mikelberg Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 41 2000 1730 1742
32. C.-X. Zhang, J.-S. Zhang, and G.-Y. Zhang Using boosting to prune double-bagging ensembles Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 53 2009 1218 1231