New glaucoma classification method based on standard Heidelberg Retina Tomograph parameters by bagging classification trees

Journal of Glaucoma

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 340-346

  Mardin, Christian Y ^a   Hothorn, Torsten ^b   Peters, Andrea ^b   Jünemann, Anselm G ^a   Nguyen, Nhung X ^a   Lausen, Berthold ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Classification trees; Glaucoma classification; HRT; Laser scanning tomography; Optic disc

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HEIDELBERG RETINA TOMOGRAPH; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEREORADIOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY;

CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; REGISTRIES; RETINA; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 0141651932     PISSN: 10570829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00061198-200308000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Mikelberg FS, Parfitt CM, Swindale NV, et al. Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to detect early glaucomatous field loss. J Glaucoma. 1995;4:242-247.
2. Uchida H, Brigatti L, Caprioli J. Detection of structural damage from glaucoma with confocal laser image analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:2393-2401.
3. Bathija R, Zangwill L, Berry CC, et al. Detection of early glaucomatous structural damage with confocal scanning laser tomography. J Glaucoma. 1998;7:121-127.
4. Wollstein G, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA: Identifying early glaucomatous changes. Comparison between expert clinical assessment of optic disc photographs and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopy. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:1557-1563.
5. Mardin CY, Horn FK, Jonas JB, et al. Preperimetric glaucoma diagnosis by confocal scanning laser tomography of the optic disc. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83:299-304.
6. Swindale NV, Stjepanovic G, Chin A, et al. Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1730-1742.
7. Iester M, Jonas JB, Mardin CY, et al. Discriminant analysis models for early detection of glaucomatous optic disc changes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:464-468.
8. Ally F, Garway-Heath DF, Mardin CY, et al. Comparison of algorithms used to classify eyes by means of Heidelberg retina tomograph measurement data (abstract). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:S118.
9. Martus P, Jünemann A, Wisse M, et al. Multivariate approach for quantification of morphologic and functional damage in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:1099-1110.
10. Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GOH. Optic disk morphometry in high myopia. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1988;226:587-590.
11. Bartz-Schmidt KU, Jonsecu-Cuypers CP, Thumann G, et al. Effect of the contour line on cup surface using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1996;209:292-297.
12. Zinser G, Harbarth U, Schröder H. Formation and analysis of three-dimensional data with the laser tomographic scanner. In: Nasemann J, Burk ROW, eds. Laser Scanning Ophthalmoscopy and Tomography. München: Quintessenz; 1990:243-252.
13. Kruse FE, Burk ROW, Völcker HE, et al. Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the optic nerve head with laser tomographic scanning. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:1320-1324.
14. Dreher AW, Tso PC, Weinreb RN. Reproducibility of topographic measurements of the normal and glaucomatous nerve head with the laser tomographic scanner. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111:221-229.
15. Weinreb RN, Lusky M, Bartsch DU, et al. Effect of repetitive imaging on topographic measurements of the optic nerve head. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:636-638.
16. Cioffi GA, Robin AL, Eastman RD, et al. Confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope: reproducibility of optic nerve head topographic measurements with the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Ophthalmology. 1993;100:57-62.
17. Mikelberg FS, Wijsman K, Schulzer M. Reproducibility of topographic parameters obtained with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. J Glaucoma. 1993;2:101-103.
18. Chauhan BC, LeBlanc RP, McCormick TA, et al. Test-retest variability of topographic measurements with confocal scanning laser tomography in patients with glaucoma and control subjects. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;118:9-15.
19. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, et al. Classification and Regression Trees. California: Wadsworth; 1984.
20. Breiman L. Arcing Classifiers. The Annals of Statistics. 1998;26:801-824.
21. Efron B, Tibshirani R. Improvements on Cross-Validation: The.632+ Bootstrap Method. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1997;92(438):548-560.
22. Jonas JB, Müller-Bergh JA, Schlötzer-Schrehardt UM, et al. Histomorphometry of the human optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1990;31:736-744.
23. Mardin CY, Horn FK. Influence of optic disc size on the sensitivity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998;236:641-645.
24. Dielemans I, Vingerling JR, Wolfs RC, et al. The prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma in a population-based study in The Netherlands. The Rotterdam Study. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1851-1855.
25. Weih LM, Mukesh BN, McCarty CA, et al. Association of demographic, familial, medical, and ocular factors with intraocular pressure. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:875-880.
26. Coleman AL. Glaucoma. The Lancet. 1999;354:1803-1810.
27. Bonomi L, Marchini G, Marraffa M, et al. The relationship between intraocular pressure and glaucoma in a defined population. Data from the Egna-Neumarkt Glaucoma Study. Ophthalmologica. 2001;215:34-38.
28. Georgopoulos G, Andreanos D, Liokis N, et al. Risk factors in ocular hypertension. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1997;7:357-363.
29. Trick GL. PRRP abnormalities in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986;27:1730-1736.
30. Lausen B, Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M. Classification and Regression Trees (CART) used for the exploration of prognostic factors measured on different scales. In: Dirschedl P, Ostermann R, eds. Computational Statistics. Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag; 1994:483-496.
31. Goldbaum MH, Sample PA, Kwokleung C, et al. Comparing machine learning classifiers for diagnosing glaucoma from standard automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:162-169.
32. Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Berry CC, et al. Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1993-2000.
33. Greaney MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, et al. Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:140-145.
34. Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics. 1996;5:299-314.
35. Therneau TM, Atkinson EJ. An introduction to recursive partitioning using the rpart routine. Technical Report 61. Rochester:Mayo Clinic; 1997.
36. Peters A, Hothorn T, Lausen B. ipred. Improved Predictors. R News. 2002;2:33-36.