Simulation based analysis of automated classification of medical images

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 150-155

  Adler, W ^a   Hothorn, T ^a   Lausen, B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Classification; Glaucoma; Laser scanning images; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CASE CONTROL STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; SIMULATION; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 2642540164     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1633853     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Coleman AL. Glaucoma. The Lancet 1999; 354 (9192): 1803-10.
2. Mardin CY, Hothorn T, Peters A, Jünemann AG, Nguyen NX, Lausen B. New glaucoma classification method based on standard HRT parameters by bagging classification trees. Journal of Glaucoma 2003, 12: 340-6.
3. Michelson G, Groh MJ. Screening models for glaucoma. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 2001; 12: 105-11.
4. Peters A, Lausen B, Michelson G, Gefeller O. Diagnosis of glaucoma by indirect classifiers. Methods of Information in Medicine 2003; 42: 99-103.
5. Mikelberg FS, Parfitt CM, Swindale NV, Graham SL, Drance SM, Gosine R. Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to detect early glaucomatous visual field loss. Journal of Glaucoma 1995; 4: 242-7.
6. Mardin CY, Horn FK, Jonas JB, Budde WM. Preperimetric glaucoma diagnosis by confocal scanning laser tomography of the optic disc. British Journal of Ophthalmology 1999; 83 (3): 299-304.
7. Heidelberg-Engineering. Heidelberg Retina Tomograph: Bedienungsanleitung Software Version 2.01. Heidelberg: Heidelberg Engineering GmbH; 1997.
8. Chrastek R, Wolf M, Donath K, Michelson G, Niemann H. Automated outlining of the external margin of the optic disk for early diagnosis of glaucoma. In: Shuskova LT, Nikitin OP, Samsonov LM, Polushin PA (eds). Physics and Radioelectronics in Medicine and Ecology, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference; 2002; Vladimir State University; 2002 pp. 16-9.
9. Swindale NV, Stjepanovic G, Chin A, Mikelberg FS. Automated analysis of normal and glaucomatous optic nerve head topography images. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 2000; 41 (7): 1730-42.
10. Hothorn T, Lausen B. Bagging tree classifiers for laser scanning images: a data- and simulation-based strategy. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 2003; 27: 65-79.
11. Press WH, Teukolsky S, Vetterling W, Flannery B. Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing. 2 ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1992, pp. 675-94.
12. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classification and regression trees. California: Wadsworth; 1984.
13. Breiman L. Bagging Predictors. Machine Learning 1996; 24 (2): 123-40.
14. Hothorn T, Lausen B. Double-Bagging: combining classifiers by bootstrap aggregation. Pattern Recognition 2003; 36 (6): 1303-9.
15. Efron B, Tibshirani R. Improvements on cross-validation: the .632+ bootstrap method. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1997; 92 (438): 548-60.
16. Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1996; 5: 299-314.
17. Peters A, Hothorn T, Lausen B. ipred: Improved Predictors. R News 2002; 2 (2): 33-6.
18. Therneau TM, Atkinson EJ. An introduction to recursive partitioning using the rpart routine. Rochester: Section of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic; 1997. Report No. 61.