Arterial versus plethysmographic dynamic indices to test responsiveness for testing fluid administration in hypotensive patients: A clinical trial

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 103, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1478-1484

  Natalini, Giuseppe ^a,b   Rosano, Antonio ^a   Taranto, Maria ^a   Faggian, Barbara ^a   Vittorielli, Elena ^a   Bernardini, Achille ^a  

^a Poliambulanza Hospital   (Italy)

^b Terapia Intensiva Polifunzionale   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BREATHING; CALCULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEART INDEX; HEART OUTPUT; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPOTENSION; MALE; MEASUREMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; PULSE OXIMETER; PULSE WAVE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD VOLUME; FLUID THERAPY; HUMANS; HYPOTENSION; MIDDLE AGED; PLETHYSMOGRAPHY; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; ROC CURVE; TIDAL VOLUME;

EID: 33845650245     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000246811.88524.75     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Task Force for Hemodynamic Support of Sepsis in Adult Patients. Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients in sepsis. Crit Care Med 1999;27:639-60.
2. Dellinger RP. Cardiovascular management of septic shock. Crit Care Med 2003;31:946-55.
3. Beale JR, Hollenberg SM, Vincent JL, et al. Vasopressor and inotropic support in septic shock: an evidence-based review. Crit Care Med 2004;Suppl 32:S455-65.
4. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicitng fluid responsiveness in ICU patients. A critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 2002;121:2000-8.
5. Pinsky MR. Assessment of indices of preload and volume responsiveness. Curr Opin Crit Care 2005;11:235-9.
6. Tavernier B, Makhotine O, Lebuffe G, et al. Systolic pressure variation as a guide to fluid therapy in patients with sepsis-induced hypotension. Anesthesiology 1998;89:1313-21.
7. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:134-8.
8. Kramer A, Zygun D, Hawes H, et al. Pulse pressure variation predicts fluid responsiveness following coronary artery bypass surgery. Chest 2004;126:1563-8.
9. Dorlas JC, Nijboer JA. Photo-electric plethysmography as a monitoring device in anaesthesia. Application and interpretation. Br J Anaesth 1985;57:524-30.
10. Kim JM, Arakawa K, Benson KT, et al. Pulse oximetry and circulatory kinetics associated with pulse volume amplitude measured by photoelectric plethysmography. Anesth Analg 1986;65:1333-9.
11. Cannesson M, Besnard C, Durand PG, et al. Relation between respiratory variations in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude and arterial pulse pressure in ventilated patients. Critical Care 2005;9:R562-8.
12. Natalini G, Rosano A, Franceschetti ME, et al. Variation in arterial blood pressure and photoplethysmography during mechanical ventilation. Anesth Analg 2006;103:1182-8.
13. Shamir M, Eidelman LA, Floman Y, et al. Pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform during changes in blood volume. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:178-81.
14. Michard F, Chempla D, Richard C, et al. Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159:935-9.
15. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. 2001 SCCM/ ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med 2003;31:1250-6.
16. Obuchowski NA. Sample size tables for receiver operating characteristic studies. Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:603-8.
17. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839-43.
18. De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnarelli M, et al. Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 2005;31:517-23.
19. Pinsky MR, Vincent JL. Let us use the pulmonary artery catheter correctly and only when we need it. Crit Care Med 2005;33:1119-22.
20. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993;270:2957-63.
21. Timsit JF, Fosse JP, Troche G, et al. Calibration and discrimination by daily Logistic Organ Dysfunction scoring comparatively with daily Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scoring for predicting hospital mortality in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2002;30:2003-13.