Enhancement of viability of a probiotic Lactobacillus strain for poultry during freeze-drying and storage using the response surface methodology

Animal Science Journal

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 127-135

  Khoramnia, Anahita ^a   Abdullah, Norhani ^a   Liew, Siew Ling ^b   Sieo, Chin Chin ^a   Ramasamy, Kalavathy ^c   Ho, Yin Wan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITI KEBANGSAAN MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^c UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Cryoprotectants; Freeze drying; Probiotic; Response surface methodology; Storage

Indexed keywords

CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENT; LACTOSE; PROBIOTIC AGENT; SUCROSE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL SURVIVAL; CHICKEN; FREEZE DRYING; LACTOBACILLUS REUTERI; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; MICROBIOLOGY; MILK; TEMPERATURE; TIME;

ANIMALS; BACTERIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES; CELL SURVIVAL; CHICKENS; CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENTS; FREEZE DRYING; LACTOBACILLUS REUTERI; LACTOSE; MILK; PROBIOTICS; SUCROSE; TEMPERATURE; TIME FACTORS;

LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS REUTERI;

EID: 79251486363     PISSN: 13443941     EISSN: 17400929     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00804.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abadias M, Benabarre A, Teixidó N, Usall J, Vinas I. 2001. Effect of freeze-drying and protectants on viability of the biocontrol yeast Candida sake. International Journal of Food Microbiology 65, 173-183.
2. Adinarayana K, Ellaiah P, Srinivasulu B, Bhavani DR, Adinarayana G. 2003. Response surface methodological approach to optimize the nutritional parameters for neomycin production by Streptomyces marinensis under solid-state fermentation. Process Biochemistry 38, 1565-1572.
3. Bas D, Boyaci IH. 2007. Modeling and optimization I: usability of response surface methodology. Journal of Food Engineering 78, 836-845.
4. Carvalho AS, Silva J, Ho P, Teixeira P, Malcata FX, Gibbs P. 2003. Effect of various growth media upon survival during storage of freeze-dried Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus durans. Journal of Applied Microbiology 94, 947-952.
5. Chen MJ, Chen KN, Lin CW. 2005. Optimization on response surface models for the optimal manufacturing conditions of dairy tofu. Journal of Food Engineering 68, 471-480.
6. Crowe JH, Crowe LM, Oliver AE, Tsvetkova N, Wolkers W, Tablin F. 2001. The trehalose myth revisited: introduction to a symposium on stabilization of cells in the dry state. Cryobiology 43, 89-105.
7. Del Piano M, Morelli L, Strozzi GP, Allesina S, Barba M, Deidda F, Lorenzini P, Ballare M, Montino F, Orsello M, Sartori M, Garello E, Carmagnola S, Pagliarulo M, Capurso L. 2006. Probiotics: from research to consumer. Digestive and Liver Disease 38, S248-S255.
8. Edens FW. 2003. An alternative for antibiotic use in poultry: probiotics. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola 5, 75-97.
9. Fung WY, Woo YP, Liong MT. 2008. Optimization of growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus FTCC 09291 and evaluation of growth characteristics in soy whey medium: a response surface methodology approach. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 56, 7910-7918.
10. Ghadge SV, Raheman H. 2005. Process optimization for biodiesel production from mahua oil using response surface methodology. Bioresource Technology 97, 79-384.
11. Gouda MD, Thakur MS, Karanth NG. 2001. Optimization of the multienzyme system for sucrose biosensor by response surface methodology. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 17, 595-600.
12. Holzapfel WH, Schillinger U. 2001. Introduction to pre- and probiotics. Food Research International 35, 109-116.
13. Huang L, Lu Z, Yuan Y, Lü F, Bie X. 2006. Optimization of a protective medium for enhancing the viability of freeze-dried Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus based on response surface methodology. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 33, 55-61.
14. Hubalek Z. 2003. Protectants used in the cryopreservation of microorganisms. Cryobiology 46, 205-229.
15. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Abdullah N, Ali AM, Jalaludin S. 1996b. Antagonistic effects of intestinal Lactobacillus isolates on pathogens of chickens. Letters of Applied Microbiology 23, 67-71.
16. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Ali AM, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S. 1996c. Effect of adherent Lactobacillus spp. on in vitro adherence of Salmonellae to the intestinal epithelial cells of chickens. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 81, 201-206.
17. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Ali AM, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S. 1998. Acid and bile tolerance of Lactobacillus isolated from chicken intestine. Letters of Applied Microbiology 27, 183-185.
18. Jin LZ, Ho YW, Ali AM, Abdullah N, Ong KB, Jalaludin S. 1996a. Adhesion of Lactobacillus isolates to intestinal epithelial cell so chicken. Letters of Applied Microbiology 22, 229-232.
19. Leslie SB, Israeli E, Lightghart B, Crowe JH, Crowe LM. 1995. Trehalose and sucrose protect both membranes and proteins in intact bacteria during drying. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 61, 3592-3597.
20. Losta E, Usall J, Teixidó N, Garcia N, Vinas I. 2000. Effect of protective agaents, rehydration media and initial cell concentration on viability of Pantoea agglomerans strain CPA-2 subjected to freeze-drying. Journal of Applied Microbiology 89, 793-800.
21. Nikerel IE, Tokosy E, Kirdar B, Yildirim R. 2005. Optimizing medium composition for Taq1 endonucelase production by recombinant Escherichia coli cells using response surface methodology. Process Biochemistry 40, 1633-1639.
22. Rolfe RD. 1991. Population dynamics of the intestinal tract. In: Blankenship LC (ed.), Colonisation Control of Human Bacterial Enteropathogens in Poultry, pp. 59-75. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA.
23. Saarella M, Virkajärvi I, Alakomi HL, Sigvart-Mattila P, Mättö J. 2002. Stability and functionality of freeze-dried probiotic Bifidobacterium cells during storage in juice and milk using response surface methodology. Food Chemistry 77, 115-123.
24. Santivarangkna C, Higl B, Foerst P. 2008. Protection mechanisms of sugars during different stages of preparation process of dried lactic acid starter cultures. Food Microbiology 25, 429-441.
25. Schoug A, Olsson J, Carlfors J, Schnürer J, Håkansson S. 2006. Freeze-drying of Lactobacillus coryniformis Si3 - effects of sucrose concentration, cell density, and freezing rate on cell survival and thermophysical properties. Cryobiology 53, 119-127.
26. Schwab C, Vogel R, Gänzle MG. 2007. Influence of oligosaccharides on the viability and membrane properties of Lactobacillus reuteri TMW1.106 during freeze-drying. Cryobiology 55, 108-114.
27. Selmer-Olsen E, Birkeland SE, Sørhaug T. 1999. Effect of protective solutes on leakage from and survival of immobilized Lactobacillus subjected to drying, storage and rehydration. Journal of Applied Microbiology 87, 429-437.
28. Thammavongs B, Corroler D, Panoff JM, Auffray Y, Boutibonnes P. 1996. Physiological response of Enterococcus faecalis JH 2-2 to cold shock: growth at low temperatures and freezing/thawing challenge. Letters of Applied Microbiology 23, 398-402.
29. Zayed G, Roos YH. 2004. Influence of trehalose and moisture content on survival of Lactobacillus salivarius subjected to freeze-drying and storage. Process Biochemistry 39, 1081-1086.
30. Zhang Y, Baoping JI, Ling P, Zhang T. 2007. Trehalose and hyaluronic acid coordinately stabilized freeze-dried pancreatic kininogenase. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 65, 18-25.
31. Zhao G, Zhang G. 2005. Effect of protective agents, freezing temperature, rehydration media on viablility of malolactic bacteria subjected to freeze-drying. Journal of Applied Microbiology 99, 333-338.