Optimization methods for virtual screening on novel computational architectures

Current Computer-Aided Drug Design

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 44-52

  Pérez Sánchez, Horacio ^a   Wenzel, Wolfgang ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cell processor; Drug design; Drug discovery; FPGA; Graphical processing unit; Optimization; Virtual screening

Indexed keywords

COMPUTING POWER; DATABASE SYSTEMS; GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNIT; INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DESIGN; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROGRAM PROCESSORS;

CELL PROCESSOR; COMPUTATIONAL ARCHITECTURE; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG DISCOVERY; DRUG DISCOVERY PROCESS; GRAPHICAL PROCESSING UNITS; OPTIMISATIONS; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; SCREENING METHODS; VIRTUAL SCREENING;

FIELD PROGRAMMABLE GATE ARRAYS (FPGA);

LIGAND; RECEPTOR;

ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER; COST; DRUG SCREENING; INFORMATION PROCESSING; KERNEL METHOD; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR MODEL; SIMULATION; VIRTUAL SCREENING;

EID: 78951469831     PISSN: 15734099     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/157340911793743565     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Kadau, K.; Germann, T.C.; Lomdahl, P.S. Molecular dynamics comes of age: 320 billion atom simulation on Blue Gene/L. Int. J.Mod. Phys. C, 2006, 17, 1755-1761.
2. Prakhov, N.; Chernorudskiy, A.; Gainullin, M. VS Docker: a tool for parallel high-throughput virtual screening using Auto Dock on Windows-based computer clusters. Bioinformatics, 2010, 26, 1374-1375.
3. Irwin, J.; Shoichet, B. ZINC-a free database of commercially available compounds for virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model, 2005, 45, 177-182. Available from: http://zinc.docking.org/[accessed September 1, 2010].
4. Huang, N.; Shoichet, B.K.; Irwin, J.J. Benchmarking sets formolecular docking. J. Med. Chem., 2006, 49, 6789-6801.
5. Apweiler, R.; Bairoch, A.; Wu, C.H.; Barker, W.C.; Boeckmann, B.; Ferro, S.; Gasteiger, E.; Huang, H.Z.; Lopez, R.; Magrane, M.; Martin, M.J.; Natale, D.A.; O'Donovan, C.; Redaschi, N.; Yeh, L.S.L. UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res., 2004, 32, D115-D119.Available from: http://www.uniprot.org/ [accessed September 1, 2010].
6. Berman, H.M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T.N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I.N.; Bourne, P.E. The protein data bank.Nucleic Acids Res., 2000, 28, 235-242.Available from: http://www.pdb.org [accessed September 1, 2010].
7. Gromiha, M.M.; An, J.; Kono, H.; Oobatake, M.; Uedaira, H.; Sarai, A. Pro Therm: Thermo dynamic database for proteins and mutants. Nucleic Acids Res., 1999, 27, 286-288.Available from:http://gibk26.bse.kyutech.ac.jp/jouhou/Protherm/protherm.html [accessed September 1, 2010].
8. Gromiha, M.M.; Yabuki, Y.; Suresh, M.X.; Thangakani, A.M.; Suwa, M.; Fukui, K. TM Function: database for functional residues in membrane proteins. Nucleic Acids Res., 2009, 37, D201-D204.Available from: http://tmbeta-genome.cbrc.jp/TMFunction/ [accessed September 1, 2010].
9. Zhou, Z.; Felts, A.; Friesner, R.; Levy, R. Comparative performance of several flexible docking programs and scoring functions: enrichment studies for a diverse set of pharmaceutically relevant targets. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2007, 47, 1599-1608.
10. Wang, J.; Deng, Y.; Roux, B. Absolute binding free energycal culations using molecular dynamics simulations with restraining potentials. Biophys. J., 2006, 91, 2798-2814.
11. Pham, D.; Aipperspach, T.; Boerstler, D.; Bolliger, M.; Chaudhry, R.; Cox, D.; Harvey, P.; Harvey, P.; Hofstee, H.; Johns, C. Overview of the architecture, circuit design, and physical implementation of a first-generation cell processor. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 2006, 41, 179-196.
12. Williams, S.; Shalf, J.; Oliker, L.; Kamil, S.; Husbands, P.; Yelick, K. Scientific computing kernels on the cell processor. Int. J.Parallel. Prog., 2007, 35, 263-298.
13. Crawford, C.H.; Henning, P.; Kistler, M.; Wright, C. Accelerating computing with the cell broadband engine processor. In:Proceedings of the 5th conference on Computing frontiers, ACM: Ischia, Italy, 2008; pp. 3-12.
14. De Fabritiis, G. Performance of the Cell processor for biomolecular simulations. Comput. Phys. Commun., 2007, 176, 660-664.
15. Giupponi, G.; Harvey, M.; De Fabritiis, G. The impact of accelerator processors for high-through put molecular modeling and simulation. Drug Discov. Today, 2008, 13, 1052-1058.
16. Phillips, J.; Areno, M.; Rogers, C.; Dasu, A.; Eames, B. Are configurable load balancing architecture for molecular dynamics. In IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. Long Beach, CA, 2007; pp. 1-6.
17. Schiller, A.; Sutmann, G.; Yang, L. A Fast Wavelet Based Implementation to Calculate Coulomb Potentials on the Cell/B.E. In Proceedings of the 2008 10th IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications, IEEE Computer Society: 2008; pp. 162-168.
18. Bader, D.; Agarwal, V.; Kang, S. Computing discrete transformson the Cell Broadband Engine. Parallel. Comput., 2009, 35, 119-137.
19. Kurzak, J.; Alvaro, W.; Dongarra, J. Optimizing matrix multiplication for a short-vector SIMD architecture-CELL processor. Parallel. Comput., 2009, 35, 138-150.
20. Pérez-Sánchez, H.E.; Wenzel, W. Implementation of an effectivenon-bonded interactions kernel for biomolecular simulations on the cell processor. In: Gesselschaft für Informatik, Jahrestagung, 2009;pp. 721-729.
21. Servat, H.; Gonzalez-Alvarez, C.; Aguilar, X.; Cabrera-Benitez, D.; Jimenez-Gonzalez, D. Drug Design Issues on the Cell BE. Lecture Notes Comput. Sci., 2008, 4917, 176-190.
22. Luttmann, E.; Ensign, D.L.; Vaidyanathan, V.; Houston, M.; Rimon, N.; Oland, J.; Jayachandran, G.; Friedrichs, M.; Pande, V.S. Accelerating molecular dynamic simulation on the cell processor and Playstation 3. J. Comput. Chem., 2009, 30, 268-74.
23. Shi, G.; Kindratenko, V. Implementation of NAMD molecular dynamics non-bonded force-field on the Cell Broadband Engine processor. In IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing. Miami, FL, 2008; pp. 1-8.
24. Shi, G.; Kindratenko, V. Performance of the Cell processor fo rbiomolecular simulations. J. Chem. Theory. Comput., 2008, 4, 222-231.
25. Olivier, S.; Prins, J.; Derby, J.; Vu, K. Porting the GROMACS molecular dynamics code to the cell processor. In: Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. IPDPS 2007. IEEE International, Long Beach, CA, 2007; pp. 1-8.
26. Sachdeva, V.; Kistler, M.; Speight, E.; Tzeng, T.H.K. Exploringthe viability of the Cell Broadband Engine for bio informatics applications. Parallel Comput., 2008, 34, 616-626.
27. Sarje, A.; Aluru, S. Parallel Genomic Alignments on the Cell Broadband Engine. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst., 2009, 20,1600-1610.
28. Vandierendonck, H.; Rul, S.; Questier, M.; Bosschere, K. D.Experiences with parallelizing a bio-informatics program on the cell BE. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on High performance embedded architectures and compilers. Springer-Verlag: Goteborg, Sweden, 2008; pp. 161-175.
29. Harvey, M.J.; De Fabritiis, G. An implementation of the smooth particle Mesh Ewald method on GPU hardware. J. Chem. Theory.Comput., 2009, 5, 2371-2377.
30. Sukhwani, B.; Herbordt, M.C. GPU acceleration of a production molecular docking code. In Proceedings of 2nd Workshop onGeneral Purpose Processing on Graphics Processing Units. ACM:Washington, D.C., 2009; pp. 19-27
31. Roh, Y.; Lee, J.; Park, S.; Kim, J.I. A molecular docking system using CUDA. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Hybrid Information Technology. ACM: Daejeon, Korea, 2009;pp. 28-33.
32. Haque, I.S.; Pande, V.S. PAPER-accelerating parallel evaluations of ROCS. J. Comput. Chem., 2010, 31, 117-132.
33. Haque, I.S.; Pande, V.S.; Walters, W.P. SIML: a fast SIMD algorithm for calculating LINGO chemical similarities on GPUs and CPUs. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2010, 50, 560-564.
34. Friedrichs, M.; Eastman, P.; Vaidyanathan, V.; Houston, M.; Legrand, S.; Beberg, A.; Ensign, D.; Bruns, C.; Pande, V.Accelerating molecular dynamic simulation on graphics processing units. J. Comput. Chem., 2009, 30, 864-872.
35. Liu, W.; Schmidt, B.; Voss, G.; Müller-Wittig, W. Accelerating molecular dynamics simulations using graphics processing units with CUDA. Comput. Phys. Commun., 2008, 179, 634-641.
36. Yang, H.; Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Luan, Z.; Qian, D.; Chu, T. Accelerating Dock6's amber scoring with graphic processing Unit. Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing, 2010, pp.404-415.
37. Stone, J.E.; Phillips, J.C.; Freddolino, P.L.; Hardy, D.J.; Trabuco, L.G.; Schulten, K. Accelerating molecular modeling applications with graphics processors. J. Comput. Chem., 2007, 28, 2618-2640.
38. Schmid, N.; Botschi, M.; Van Gunsteren, W.F. A GPU solvent-solvent interaction calculation accelerator for biomolecular simulations using the GROMOS software. J. Comput. Chem., 2010,31, 1636-1643.
39. Eastman, P.; Pande, V.S. Efficient non-bonded interactions for molecular dynamics on a graphics processing unit. J. Comput. Chem., 2010, 31, 1268-1272.
40. Dynerman, D.; Butzlaff, E.; Mitchell, J. CUSA and CUDE: GPU-accelerated methods for estimating solvent accessible surface area and desolvation. J. Comput. Biol., 2009, 16, 523-537.
41. Ufimtsev, I.S.; Martinez, T.J. Quantum chemistry on graphical processing units. 1. Strategies for two-electron integral evaluation. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2008, 4, 222-231.
42. Frisch, E.; Frisch, M.; Trucks, G. Gaussian 03. Gaussian Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
43. Yasuda, K.Accelerating density functional calculations with graphics processing unit. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2008, 4, 1230-1236.
44. Olivares-Amaya, R.; Watson, M.A.; Edgar, R.G.; Vogt, L.; Shao, Y. H.; Aspuru-Guzik, A. Accelerating correlated quantum chemistry calculations using graphical processing units and amixed precision matrix multiplication library. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2010, 6, 135-144.
45. Case, D.A.; Cheatham, T.E.; Darden, T.; Gohlke, H.; Luo, R.; Merz, K.M.; Onufriev, A.; Simmerling, C.; Wang, B.; Woods, R. J.The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J. Comput. Chem.,2005, 26, 1668-1688.
46. Alam, S.R.; Agarwal, P.K.; Smith, M.C.; Vetter, J.S.; Caliga, D. Using FPGA devices to accelerate biomolecular simulations. Computer, 2007, 40, 66-73.
47. Showerman, M.; Enos, J.; Pant, A.; Kindratenko, V.; Steffen, C.; Pennington, R.; Hwu, W. QP: a heterogeneous multi-acceleratorcluster. In: Proceedings of the 10th LCI International Conferenceon High-performance Clustered Computing, Boulder, CO, USA, 2009; pp. 1-8.
48. Meredith, J.; Alam, S.; Vetter, J. Analysis of a computational biology simulation technique on emerging processing architectures. In IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium. Long Beach, CA, 2007; pp. 1-8.
49. Galvez, S.; Diaz, D.; Hernandez, P.; Esteban, F. J.; Caballero, J. A.; Dorado, G. Next-generation bioinformatics: using many-coreprocessor architecture to develop a web service for sequence alignment. Bioinformatics, 2010, 26, 683-686.
50. Hawkins, P.; Skillman, A.; Nicholls, A. Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools. J. Med. Chem.,2007, 50, 74-82.
51. Van Der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E.; Hess, B.; Groenhof, G.; Mark, A.; Berendsen, H. GROMACS: fast, flexible, and free. J. Comput. Chem., 2005, 26, 1701-1718.
52. Phillips, J.; Braun, R.; Wang, W.; Gumbart, J.; Tajkhorshid, E.; Villa, E.; Chipot, C.; Skeel, R.; Kale, L.; Schulten, K. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J. Comput. Chem., 2005, 26,1781-1802.
53. Christen, M.; Hunenberger, P.H.; Bakowies, D.; Baron, R.; Burgi, R.; Geerke, D.P.; Heinz, T.N.; Kastenholz, M.A.; Krautler, V.; Oostenbrink, C.; Peter, C.; Trzesniak, D.; van Gunsteren, W.F. The GROMOS software for biomolecular simulation: GROMOS05. J. Comput. Chem., 2005, 26, 1719-1751.
54. Nvidia, C. Compute unified device architecture programming guide. NVIDIA: Santa Clara, CA, 2007.
55. Pande, V.; Baker, I.; Chapman, J.; Elmer, S.; Khaliq, S.; Larson, S.; Rhee, Y.; Shirts, M.; Snow, C.; Sorin, E. Atomistic protein folding simulations on the submilli second time scale using world wide distributed computing. Biopolymers, 2003, 68, 91-109.
56. Goodsell, D.; Morris, G.; Olson, A. Automated docking of flexibleligands: applications of Auto Dock. J. Mol. Recognit., 1998, 9, 1-5.
57. Case, D.A.; Cheatham, T.E., 3rd; Darden, T.; Gohlke, H.; Luo, R.; Merz, K.M., Jr.; Onufriev, A.; Simmerling, C.; Wang, B.; Woods, R.J. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J. Comput. Chem., 2005, 26, 1668-1688.
58. Delcher, A.; Kasif, S.; Fleischmann, R.; Peterson, J.; White, O.; Salzberg, S. Alignment of whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res.,1999, 27, 2369.
59. Larkin, M.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.; Chenna, R.; McGettigan, P.; McWilliam, H.; Valentin, F.; Wallace, I.; Wilm, A.; Lopez, R. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics, 2007, 23,2947.
60. Sheng, H.; Mehrotra, K.; Mohan, C.; Raina, R. HAMMER algorithm: hashing with arithmetic modulo-4 for motif extraction of regulatory elements. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering. Boston, MA, 2007; pp. 753-758.
61. Anderson, J.A.; Lorenz, C.D.; Travesset, A. General purpose molecular dynamics simulations fully implemented on graphics processing units. J. Comput. Phys., 2008, 227, 5342-5359.
62. Hardy, D.; Stone, J.; Schulten, K. Multilevel summation of electrostatic potentials using graphics processing units. Parallel Comput., 2009, 35, 164-177.
63. Friedrichs, M.S.; Eastman, P.; Vaidyanathan, V.; Houston, M.; Legrand, S.; Beberg, A.L.; Ensign, D.L.; Bruns, C.M.; Pande, V.S. Accelerating molecular dynamic simulation on graphics processingunits. J. Comput. Chem., 2009, 30, 864-872.
64. Abagyan, R.; Totrov, M.; Kuznetsov, D. ICM-a new method forprotein modeling and design: applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation. J. Comput. Chem., 2004, 15, 488-506.