Semantic annotation of video fragments as learning objects: A case study with YouTube videos and the Gene Ontology

Interactive Learning Environments

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 25-44

  García Barriocanal, Elena ^a   Sicilia, Miguel Angel ^a   Sánchez Alonso, Salvador ^a   Lytras, Miltiadis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALCALÁ   (Spain)

^b AMERICAN COLLEGE OF GREECE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Gene ontology; Learning objects; Multimedia; Ontologies; semantic annotation; Video clips; Web 2.0; YouTube

Indexed keywords

EID: 78751625872     PISSN: 10494820     EISSN: 17445191     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2011.528879     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Ache, K., & Wallace, L. (2008). Human papillomavirus vaccination coverage on YouTube. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, 389-392.
2. Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative. (n.d.). Sharable content object reference model (SCORM). Advanced Distributed Learning. Retrieved from http://www.adlnet.org.
3. Allen, M. (2008). Web 2.0: An argument against convergence. First Monday, 13.
4. Amorim, R., Lama, M., Sánchez, E., Riera, A., & Vila, X.A. (2006). A learning design ontology based on the IMS specification. IEEE Journal of Educational Technology Society,9(1), 38-57.
5. Bagdanov, A.D., Bertini, M., Bimbo, A.D., Serra, G., & Torniai, C. (2007). Semantic annotation and retrieval of video events using multimedia ontologies. International conference on semantic computing, 2007. ICSC 2007 (pp. 713-720). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
6. Bargeron, D., Gupta, A., Grudin, J., & Sanocki, E. (1999). Annotations for streaming video on the web. CHI'99 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 278-279). Pittsburgh, PA: ACM.
7. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American, 284,34-43.
8. Brown, W., Srinivasan, S., Coden, A., Pronceleon, D., Cooper, J.W., & Amir, A. (2001). Toward speech as a knowledge resource. IBM Systems Journal, 40, 985-1001.
9. Cafolla, R. (2002). Project Merlot: Bringing peer review to Web-based educational resources. In Proceedings of the USA Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 614-618. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
10. Cochrane, T. (2007). Developing interactive multimedia learning objects using quicktime. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2596-2640.
11. Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2008). Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: Quality perspectives. Educational Media International, 45, 93-106.
12. Corcho, O. (2006). Ontology based document annotation: Trends and open research problems. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 1, 47-57.
13. de Bruijn, J., Lausen, H., Krummenacher, R., Polleres, A., Predoiu, L., Kifer, M., & Fensel, D. (2005). The Web Service Modeling Language WSML. WSML Final Draft D, 16.
14. Devgan, L., Powe, N., Blakey, B., & Makary, M. (2007). Wiki-Surgery? Internal validity of Wikipedia as a medical and surgical reference. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 205(3 Suppl 1), S76-S77.
15. Dodero, J.M., Di{dotless}́az, P., Aedo, I., & Sarasa, A. (2005). Integrating ontologies into the collaborative authoring of learning objects. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 11,1568-1578.
16. Downes, S. (2004). Resource profiles. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 5.
17. Eijkman, H. (2008). Web 2.0 as a non-foundational network-centric learning space. Campus- Wide Information Systems, 25, 93-104.
18. Feng, S., Manmatha, R., & Lavrenko, V. (2004). Multiple Bernoulli relevance models for image and video annotation. Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004 (Vol. 2, pp. II-1002-II-1009).
19. Fischer, S. (2001). Course and exercise sequencing using metadata in adaptive hypermedia learning systems. Journal of Educational Resource in Computing, 1, 5.
20. Gahegan, M., Agrawal, R., Banchuen, T., & DiBiase, D. (2007). Building rich, semantic descriptions of learning activities to facilitate reuse in digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 7, 81-97.
21. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., & Schneider, L. (2002). Sweeteningontologies with DOLCE. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2473, 166-181.
22. Gaševic, D., Jovanovic, J., & Devedž ic, V. (2007). Ontology-based annotation of learning object content. Interactive Learning Environments, 15, 1-26.
23. Gene Ontology Consortium. (2004). The gene ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Research 32, D258-D261.
24. Gruber, T.R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition, 5, 199-220.
25. Gruber, T. (2007). Ontology of folksonomy: A mash-up of apples and oranges. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 3(1), 1-11.
26. Hausmanns, C., Zerry, R., Goers, B., Urbas, L., Gauss, B., & Wozny, G. (2003). Multimediasupported teaching of process system dynamics using an ontology-based semantic network. Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, 15, 1453-1459.
27. Hunter, J. (2006). Adding multimedia to the semantic web - Building and applying an MPEG-7 ontology. Multimedia content and the semantic web: Methods, standards and tools. New York: Wiley.
28. Jenkins, H. (2007). From YouTube to YouNiversity. Chronicle of Higher Education, 53, B9.
29. Jovanovic, J., Gaševic, D., & Devedž ic, V. (2006). Ontology-based automatic annotation of learning content. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 2, 91-119.
30. Kahan, J., Koivunen, M.R., Prud'Hommeaux, E., & Swick, R.R. (2002). Annotea: An open RDF infrastructure for shared Web annotations. Computer Networks, 39, 589-608.
31. Kolbitsch, J., & Hermann, M. (2006). The transformation of the web: How emerging communities shape the information we consume. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 12, 187-213.
32. Koper, R., Olivier, B., & Anderson, T. (2003). IMS learning design information model. IMSGlobal Learning Consortium technical report.
33. Korakakis, G., Pavlatou, E., Palyvos, J., & Spyrellis, N. (2009). 3D visualization types in multimedia applications for science learning: A case study for 8th grade students in Greece, Computers & Education, 52, 390-401.
34. Lenat, D.B. (1995). CYC: A large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Communicationsof the ACM, 38, 33-38.
35. Lienhart, R. (1996). Indexing and retrieval of digital video sequences based on automatic text recognition. Proceedings of the fourth ACM international multimedia conference. Boston, MA: ACM Press.
36. Luttrell, K., Zite, N., & Wallace, L. (2008). Myths and misconceptions about intrauterinecontraception on YouTube. Contraception, 78, 183.
37. Mayer, R. (Ed.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
38. Mayer, R.E., & Moreno, R. (1997). A cognitive theory of multimedia learning: Implications for design principles. New York, NY: Wiley.
39. McGreal, R. (2004). Learning objects: A practical definition. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 1.
40. McGuinness, D.L., & van Harmelen, F. (2004). OWL web ontology language overview. W3C Recommendation, 10, 2004-2003.
41. Milliken, M., Gibson, K., O'Donnell, S., & Singer, J. (2008, May). User-generated onlinevideo and the Atlantic Canadian public sphere: A YouTube study. Proceedings of the international communication association annual conference (ICA 2008), Montreal, Quebec,Canada. NRC 50362.
42. Miyamori, H., & Iisaku, S. (2000). Video annotation for content-based retrieval using human behavior analysis and domain knowledge. Proceedings of fourth IEEE international conference on automatic face and gesture recognition (pp. 320-325). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
43. Monceaux, A., Naeve, A., Sicilia, M.A., García-Barriocanal, E., Arroyo, S., & Guss, J. (2007). Targeting learning resources in competency-based organizations. The Semantic Web: Realworldapplications from industry (pp. 143-167). New York, NY: Springer.
44. Niles, I., & Pease, A. (2001). Towards a standard upper ontology. Proceedings of the internationalconference on formal ontology in information systems-Volume 2001 (pp. 2-9).New York, NY: ACM.
45. Nilsson, M., Palmé r, M., & Brase, J. (2003). The LOM RDF binding - Principles and implementation. Paper presented at the Third Annual ARIADNE conference, Leuven,Belgium.
46. Paolillo, J.C. (2008). Structure and network in the YouTube core. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (p. 156). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
47. Reigeluth, C.M. (Ed.). (1999). Instructional-design theories and models, Volume II: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
48. Rollett, H., Lux, M., Strohmaier, M., Dö singer, G., & Tochtermann, K. (2007). The Web 2.0 way of learning with technologies. International Journal of Learning Technology, 3, 87-107.
49. Sánchez-Alonso, S., Sicilia, M.A., & Pareja, M. (2007). Mapping IEEE LOM to WSML: An ontology of learning objects. Proceedings of the ITA'07 - Second International conferenceon internet technologies and applications (pp. 92-101). Wrexham: North East Wales Institute.
50. Sicilia, M.A. & García-Barriocanal, E. (2003). On the concepts of usability and reusability oflearning objects. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4.
51. Sicilia, M.A., Lytras, M., Rodríguez, E., & García-Barriocanal, E. (2006). Integratingdescriptions of knowledge management learning activities into large ontological structures: A case study. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 57, 111-121.
52. Simou, N., Saathoff, C., Dasiopoulou, S., Spyrou, E., Voisine, N., Tzouvaras, V., Staab, S. (2005). An ontology infrastructure for multimedia reasoning. Paper presented at the international workshop VLBV, Sardinia, Italy.
53. Spiteri, L.F. (2007). Structure and form of folksonomy tags: The road to the public library catalogue. Webology, 4.
54. Stemler, L. (1997). Educational characteristics of multimedia: A literature review. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6, 339-359.
55. Volkmer, T., Smith, J.R., & Natsev, A.P. (2005). A web-based system for collaborative annotation of large image and video collections: An evaluation and user study.Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on multimedia (pp. 892-901). New York, NY: ACM.