Private equity investment decisions in family firms: The role of human resources and agency costs

Journal of Business Venturing

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 189-199

  Dawson, Alexandra ^a  

^a Civil and Environmental Engineering   (Canada)

Author keywords

Conjoint analysis; Decision making; Family firms; Private equity

Indexed keywords

EID: 78751582402     PISSN: 08839026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (127)

1. Argyris C., Schon D.A. Theory in Practice: increasing Professional Effectiveness 1974, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
2. Italian Private Equity and Venture Capital Association Yearbook 2005, AIFI, AIFI, Milan, Italy.
3. Anderson R.C., Reeb D.M. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500. The Journal of Finance 2003, 58(3):1301-1327.
4. Aronoff C.E. Megatrends in family business. Family Business Review 1998, 11(3):181-186.
5. Astrachan J.H. Commentary on the special issue: the emergence of a field. Journal of Business Venturing 2003, 18(5):567-573.
6. Barney J.B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 1991, 17(1):199-120.
7. Barsade S.G. The ripple effect: emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly 2002, 47(4):644-675.
8. Baum J.R., Wally S. Strategic decision speed and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 2003, 24(11):1107-1129.
9. Birley S., Westhead P. Private business sales environments in the United Kingdom. Journal of Business Venturing 1990, 5(2):349-373.
10. Birley S., Muzyka D., Hay M. Management buyout: perception of opportunity. A research note. Journal of Management Studies 1999, 36(1):109-122.
11. Boles J.S. Influences of work-family conflict on job satisfaction, life satisfaction and quitting intentions among business owners: the case of family-operated businesses. Family Business Review 1996, 9(1):61-74.
12. Brundin E., Patzelt H., Shepherd D.A. Managers' emotional displays and employees' willingness to act entrepreneurially. Journal of Business Venturing 2008, 23(2):221-243.
13. Bryk A.S., Raudenbush S.W. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods 1992, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA.
14. Burkart M., Panunzi F., Shleifer A. Family firms. The Journal of Finance 2003, 58(5):2167-2201.
15. Byrne D. The Attraction Paradigm 1971, Academic Press, New York.
16. Carter R.B., Van Auken H.E. Venture capital firms' preferences for projects in particular stages of development. Journal of Small Business Management 1994, 32(1):60-73.
17. Chaganti R., Damanpour F. Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 1991, 12(7):479-491.
18. Choi Y.R., Shepherd D.A. Entrepreneurs' decisions to exploit opportunities. Journal of Management 2004, 30(3):377-395.
19. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., Sharma P. Important attributes of successors in family businesses: an exploratory study. Family Business Review 1998, 11(1):19-34.
20. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., Steier L.P. An introduction to theories of family business. Journal of Business Venturing 2003, 18(4):441-448.
21. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., Litz R.A. Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2004, 28(4):335-354.
22. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., Sharma P. Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2005, 29(5):537-650.
23. Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H., Kellermanns F.W., Chang E.P.C. Are family managers agents or stewards? An exploratory study in privately held family firms. Journal of Business Research 2007, 60(10):1030-1038.
24. Chua J.H., Chrisman J.J., Sharma P. Succession and non-succession concerns of family firms and agency relationships with non-family managers. Family Business Review 2003, 16(2):89-107.
25. European Management Buy-Outs 2005, CMBOR, Centre for Management Buy-Out Research, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
26. Corbetta G. Family Firms. Original Characteristics, Diversity and Conditions for Development (in Italian) 1995, Egea, Milan.
27. Corbetta G., Salvato C. Self-serving of self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: a commentary on "Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: conceptual issues and exploratory evidence". Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2004, 28(4):355-362.
28. Cosier R.A., Harvey M. The hidden strengths in family business: functional conflict. Family Business Review 1998, 11(1):75-79.
29. Covin T.J. Perceptions of family-owned firms: the impact of gender and educational level. Journal of Small Business Management 1994, 32(3):29-39.
30. Cumming D., Siegel D.S., Wright M. Private equity, leveraged buyouts and governance. Journal of Corporate Finance 2007, 13:439-460.
31. Davis J.H., Schoorman F.D., Donaldson L. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review 1997, 22(1):20-47.
32. Deadrick D.L., Bennett N., Russell C.J. Using hierarchical linear modeling to examine dynamic performance criteria over time. Journal of Management 1997, 23(6):745-757.
33. DeTienne D.R., Shepherd D.A., DeCastro J. The fallacy of "only the strong survive": the effects of extrinsic motivation on the persistence decisions for underperforming firms. Journal of Business Venturing 2008, 23(5):528-546.
34. Dreux D.R. Financing family businesses: alternatives to selling out or going public. Family Business Review 1992, 5(2):233-237.
35. Dyer W.G. Cultural Change in Family Firms 1986, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
36. Dyer W.G. Integrating professional management into a family owned business. Family Business Review 1989, 2(3):221-235.
37. Dyer W.G. The family: the missing variable in organizational research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2003, 27(4):401-416.
38. Eddleston K.A., Kellermanns F.W. Destructive and productive family relationships: a stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing 2007, 22(4):545-565.
39. Eddleston K.A., Otondo R.F., Kellermanns F.W. Conflict, participative decision-making, and generational ownership dispersion: a multilevel analysis. Journal of Small Business Management 2008, 46(3):456-484.
40. Elango B., Fried V.H., Hisrich R.D., Polonchek A. How venture capital firms differ. Journal of Business Venturing 1995, 10(2):157-179.
41. Finkelstein S., Hambrick D.C. Top-management tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990, 35(3):484-503.
42. Franke N., Gruber M., Harhoff D., Henkel J. What you are is what you like-similarity biases in venture capitalists' evaluations of start-up teams. Journal of Business Venturing 2006, 21(6):802-826.
43. Gallo M., Vilaseca A. A financial perspective on structure, conduct, and performance in the family firms: an empirical study. Family Business Review 1998, 11(1):35-47.
44. Gersick K.E., Davis J.A., McCollom Hampton M., Lansberg I. Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business 1997, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
45. Gomez-Mejia L.R., Nunez-Nickel M., Gutierrez I. The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal 2001, 44(1):81-95.
46. Grant R.M., Baden-Fuller C. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies 2004, 41(1):61-84.
47. Habbershon T.G., Williams M.L. A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review 1999, 12(1):1-22.
48. Habbershon T.G., Williams M., MacMillan I.C. A unified systems perspective of family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing 2003, 18(4):451-465.
49. Hahn G.J., Shapiro S.S. A Catalog and Computer Program for the Design and Analysis of Orthogonal Symmetric and Asymmetric Fractional Factorial Experiments 1966, General Electric Research and Development Center, Schenectady, NY.
50. Hair J.F., Anderson R.E., Tatham R.L., Black W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis 1998, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
51. Hall A., Nordqvist M. Professional management in family businesses: toward an extended understanding. Family Business Review 2008, 21(1):51-69.
52. Hambrick D.C., Mason P.A. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review 1984, 9(2):193-206.
53. Handbook of Data Analysis 2004, Sage Publications, London, UK. M. Hardy, A. Bryman (Eds.).
54. Harvey M., Evans R.E. Family business and multiple levels of conflict. Family Business Review 1994, 7(4):331-348.
55. Haynes J., Usdin T. Resolving family business disputes through mediation. Family Business Review 1997, 10(2):115-134.
56. Higashide H., Birley S. The consequences of conflict between the venture capitalist and the entrepreneurial team in the United Kingdom from the perspective of the venture capitalist. Journal of Business Venturing 2002, 17(1):59-81.
57. Hisrich R.D., Jankowicz A.D. Intuition in venture capital decisions: an exploratory study using a new technique. Journal of Business Venturing 1990, 5(1):49-62.
58. Hofmann D.A., Griffin M.A., Gavin M.B. The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations 2000, 467-511. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. K.J. Klein, S.W.J. Kozlowski (Eds.).
59. Horton T.P. Managing in a family way. Management Review 1986, 75(2):3.
60. Howorth C., Westhead P., Wright M. Buyouts, information asymmetry and the family management dyad. Journal of Business Venturing 2004, 19(4):509-534.
61. Jackson S.E., Brett J.F., Sessa V.E., Cooper D.M., Julin J.A., Peyronnin K. Some differences make a difference: individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology 1991, 76(5):675-689.
62. Jehn K.A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly 1995, 40(2):256-282.
63. Jensen M.C. The modern Industrial Revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 1993, 48(3):831-880.
64. Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics 1976, 3(4):305-360.
65. Kaye K. Penetrating the cycle of sustained conflict. Family Business Review 1991, 4(1):21-44.
66. Keats B.W. An empirical investigation of strategic investment decision models. Strategic Management Journal 1991, 12(3):243-250.
67. Kellermanns F.W., Eddleston K.A. Feuding families: when conflict does a family firm good. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2004, 28(3):209-228.
68. Kellermanns F.W., Eddleston K.A. A family perspective on when conflict benefits family firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing 2007, 60(10):1048-1057.
69. Kirchhoff B.A., Kirchhoff J.J. Family contributions to productivity and profitability in small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management 1987, 25(4):237-256.
70. Klein S.B. Family businesses in Germany: significance and structure. Family Business Review 2000, 13(3):157-181.
71. La Porta R., Lopez-de-Silanes F., Shleifer A. Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance 1999, 54(2):471-517.
72. Lane P.J., Lubatkin M. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal 1998, 19(5):461-477.
73. Handbook of Research on Venture Capital 2007, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK. H. Landström (Ed.).
74. Lee M.S., Rogoff E.G. Research note: comparison of small businesses with family participation versus small businesses without family participation: an investigation of differences in goals, attitudes, and family/business conflict. Family Business Review 1996, 9(4):423-437.
75. Lee D.S., Lim G.H., Lim W.S. Family business succession: appropriation risk and choice of successor. Academy of Management Review 2003, 28(4):657-666.
76. Lubatkin M.H., Durand R., Ling Y. The missing lens in family firm governance theory: a self-other typology of parental altruism. Journal of Business Research 2007, 60(10):1022-1029.
77. Lunati M.T. Ethical Issues in Economics: From Altruism to Cooperation to Equity 1997, Macmillan, London.
78. MacMillan I.C., Siegel R., SubbaNarasimha P.N. Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing 1985, 1(1):119-128.
79. Markides C. Strategic innovation in established companies. Sloan Management Review 1998, 39(3):31-42.
80. Mason C., Harrison R. Venture capital: rationale, aims and scope. Venture Capital 1999, 1(1):1-46.
81. Meyer G.D., Zacharakis A.L., De Castro J. A Post-Mortem of New Venture Failure: An Attribution Theory Perspective. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 1993, 256-269. Babson College, Wellesley, MA.
82. Miller G.A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 1956, 62:81-97.
83. Miller E., Rice A. The family business in contemporary society. Family Business Review 1988, 1(2):193-210.
84. Morck R., Yeung B. Agency problems in large family groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2003, 27(4):367-382.
85. Muzyka D., Birley S., Leleux B. Trade-offs in the investment decisions of European venture capitalists. Journal of Business Venturing 1996, 11(4):273-287.
86. Olson P.D., Zuiker V.S., Danes S.M., Stafford K., Heck R.K.Z., Duncan K.A. The impact of the family and the business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing 2003, 18(5):639-667.
87. Orme B.K. Sample Size Issues for Conjoint Analysis Studies 1998, Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series, Sequim, WA.
88. Orme B.K., Alpert M.I., Christensen E. Assessing the Validity of Conjoint Analysis-Continued 1997, Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series, Sequim, WA.
89. Poutziouris P.Z. The views of family companies on venture capital: empirical evidence from the UK small to medium-size enterprising economy. Family Business Review 2001, 14(3):277-291.
90. Randøy T., Goel S. Ownership structure, founder leadership, and performance in Norwegian SMEs: implications for financing entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing 2003, 18(5):619-637.
91. Raser J.R. Simulation and Society: An Exploration of Scientific Gaming 1969, Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA.
92. Raudenbusch S.W., Bryk A.S. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods 2002, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
93. Reid G.C. Fast growing small entrepreneurial firms and their venture capital backers: an applied principal-agent analysis. Small Business Economics 1996, 8(1):1-14.
94. Riquelme H., Rickards T. Hybrid conjoint analysis: an estimation probe in new venture decisions. Journal of Business Venturing 1992, 7(6):505-518.
95. Robbie K., Wright M., Albrighton M. High-tech management buy-outs. Venture Capital 1999, 1(3):219-239.
96. Rogoff E.G., Heck R.K.Z. Evolving research in entrepreneurship and family business: recognizing family as the oxygen that feeds the fire of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing 2003, 18(5):559-566.
97. Rothaermel F.T. Incumbent's advantage through exploiting complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal 2001, 22(6-7):687-699.
98. Salvato C. Predictors of entrepreneurship in family firms. The Journal of Private Equity 2004, 7(3):68-76.
99. Sandberg W.R., Schweiger D.M., Hofer C.W. The use of verbal protocols in determining venture capitalists' decision process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 1988, 13(2):8-20.
100. Schein E.H. The role of the founder in creating organizational culture. Family Business Review 1995, 8(3):221-238.
101. Schulze W.S., Lubatkin M.H., Dino R.N., Buchholtz A.K. Agency relationships in family firms: theory and evidence. Organization Science 2001, 12(2):99-116.
102. Schulze W.S., Lubatkin M.H., Dino R.N. Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal 2003, 46(2):179-194.
103. Shanker M.C., Astrachan J.H. Myths and realities: family businesses' contributions to the US economy. Family Business Review 1996, 9(2):107-123.
104. Sharma P., Chrisman J.J., Chua J.H. Strategic management of family business: past research and future challenges. Family Business Review 1997, 10(1):1-35.
105. Shepherd D.A. Venture capitalists' assessment of new venture survival. Management Science 1999, 45(5):621-632.
106. Shepherd D.A., Zacharakis A. Conjoint analysis: a new methodological approach for researching the decision policies of venture capitalists. Venture Capital 1999, 1(3):197-217.
107. Shepherd D.A., Zacharakis A. Venture capitalists' expertise: a call for research into decision aids and cognitive feedback. Journal of Business Venturing 2002, 17(1):1-20.
108. Shepherd D.A., Ettenson R., Crouch A. New venture strategy and profitability: a venture capitalist's assessment. Journal of Business Venturing 2000, 15(5/6):449-467.
109. Shepherd D.A., Zacharakis A., Baron R.A. VCs' decision processes: evidence suggesting more experience may not always be better. Journal of Business Venturing 2003, 18(3):381-401.
110. Sirmon D.G., Hitt M.A. Managing resources: linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 2003, 27(4):339-358.
111. Smart G.H. Management assessment methods in venture capital: an empirical analysis of human capital valuation. Venture Capital 1999, 1(1):59-82.
112. Tagiuri R., Davis J.A. Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review 1996, 9(2):199-208.
113. Turner J. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Social Categorization Theory 1987, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
114. Tyebjee T.T., Bruno A.V. Venture Capital Decision Making: Preliminary Results From Three Empirical Studies. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 1981, 316-334. Babson College, Wellesley, MA.
115. Tyebjee T.T., Bruno A.V. A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Science 1984, 30(9):1051-1066.
116. Upton N., Petty W. Venture capital investment and US family business. Venture Capital 2000, 2(1):27-39.
117. Wright M., Coyne J. Management Buy-Outs 1985, Croom Helm, Beckenham.
118. Wright M., Robbie K. Venture capital and private equity: a review and synthesis. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 1998, 25(5):521-570.
119. Wright M., Thompson S., Robbie K. Venture capital and management-led leveraged buy-outs: European evidence. Journal of Business Venturing 1992, 7(1):47-71.
120. Wright M., Robbie K., Thompson S., Starkey K. Longevity and the life-cycle of management buy-outs. Strategic Management Journal 1994, 15(3):215-227.
121. Wright M., Hoskisson R., Busenitz L., Dial J. Finance and management buy-outs: agency versus entrepreneurship perspectives. Venture Capital 2001, 3(3):239-262.
122. Zacharakis A.L., Meyer G.D. A lack of insight: do venture capitalists really understand their own decision process?. Journal of Business Venturing 1998, 13(1):57-76.
123. Zacharakis A.L., Meyer D.G. The potential of actuarial decision models: can they improve the venture capital investment decision?. Journal of Business Venturing 2000, 15(4):323-346.
124. Zacharakis A.L., Shepherd D. Entrepreneurs' Experience and Likely Venture Success: An Investigation of VCs' Contingent Decision Policies. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research 1999, Babson College, Wellesley, MA.
125. Zacharakis A.L., Shepherd D. The nature of information and overconfidence on venture capitalists' decision making. Journal of Business Venturing 2001, 16(4):311-332.
126. Zahra S.A. Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review 2005, 18(1):23-40.
127. Zutshi R.K., Tan W.L., Allampalli D.G., Gibbons P.G. Singapore venture capitalists (VCs) investment evaluation criteria: a re-examination. Small Business Economics 1999, 13(1):9-26.