Accuracy of surgical positioning of orthodontic miniscrews with a computer-aided design and manufacturing template

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 137, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 728.e1-728.e10

  Liu, Hong ^a,b   Liu, Dong Xu ^a,b   Wang, Guangchun ^a,c   Wang, Chun Ling ^a   Zhao, Zhen ^a,b  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine   (China)

^c Research Center of Mould   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BONE SCREW; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; INCISOR; INSTRUMENTATION; JAW; METHODOLOGY; ORTHODONTICS; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY;

BONE SCREWS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; INCISOR; JAW; MODELS, ANATOMIC; ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE PROCEDURES; SOFTWARE VALIDATION; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 78651469252     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.025     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, Kok SH. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19: 100-6.
2. Wiechmann D, Meyer U, Büchter A. Success rate of mini- and micro-implants used for orthodontic anchorage: a prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:263-7.
3. Lim JE, Lim WH, Chun YS. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Clin Anat 2008;21: 486-91.
4. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:43-51.
5. Moon CH, Lee DG, Lee HS, Jin JS, Baek SH. Factors associated with the success rate of orthodontic miniscrews placed in the upper and lower posterior buccal region. Angle Orthod 2008;78: 101-6.
6. Yuan-Hou Chen, Hao-Hueng Chang, Yi-Jane Chen, David Lee, Hsien-Hsiung Chiang, Chung-Chen Jane Yao. Root contact during insertion of miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage increases the failure rate: an animal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19:99-106.
7. Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, Hashimoto T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage.AmJ Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131(Suppl):S68-73.
8. Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:18-25.
9. Sammartino G, Della Valle A, Marenzi G, Gerbino S, Martorelli M, di Lauro AE, et al. Stereolithography in oral mplantology: a comparison of surgical guides. Implant Dent 2004;13:133-9.
10. Adams GL, Gansky SA, Miller AJ, Harrell WE, Hatcher DC. Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:397-409.
11. De Smet E, Jacobs R, Gijbels F, Naert I. The accuracy and reliability of radiographic methods for the assessment of marginal bone level around oral implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31: 176-81.
12. Suzuki EY, Suzuki B. A simple three-dimensional guide for safe miniscrew placement. J Clin Orthod 2007;41:342-6.
13. Maino BG, Bednar J, Pagin P, Mura P. The spider screw for skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod 2003;37:90-7.
14. Graham JW, Cope JB. Miniscrew troubleshooting-how to manage potential complications of using temporary anchorage devices. Orthod Prod 2006;13:26-32.
15. Lal K, White GS, Morea DN, Wright RF. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept. J Prosthodont 2006; 15:51-8. (Pubitemid 43445608)
16. Tardieu PB, Vrielinck L, Escolano E. Computer-assisted implant placement. A case report: treatment of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:599-604.
17. Marchack CB. CAD/CAM-guided implant surgery and fabrication of an immediately loaded prosthesis for a partially edentulous patient. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:389-94.
18. Rosenfeld AL, Mandelaris GA, Tardieu PB. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 3: stereolithographic drilling guides that do not require bone exposure and the immediate delivery of teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:493-9.
19. Van Steenberghe D. Interactive imaging for implant planning. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;63:883-4.
20. Ganz SD. Techniques for the use of CTimaging for the fabrication of surgical guides. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2006;14:75-97.
21. van Steenberghe D, Glauser R, Blombäck U, Andersson M, Schutyser F, Pettersson A, et al. A computed tomographic scanderived customized surgical template fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7(Suppl 1):S111-20.
22. Hieu LC, Bohez E, Vander Sloten J, Phien HN, Vatcharaporn E, An PV, et al. Design and manufacturing of personalized implants and standardized templates for cranioplasty applications. Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Automations; 2002 Dec 11-14; Bangkok, Thailand. Vol. 2. Bangkok, Thailand; 2002. p. 1025-30, http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs- all.jsp?arnumber=1189312.
23. Nickenig HJ, Eitner S. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007;35: 207-11.
24. Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:571-7.
25. Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M, Spüntrup E, Steiner A, Stoll C. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19: 709-16.
26. Suzuki EY, Suzuki B. Accuracy of miniscrew implant placement with a 3-dimensional surgical guide. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66:1245-52.
27. Poggio PM, Incorvati C, Velo S, Carano A. "Safe zones": a guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch. Angle Orthod 2006;76:191-7.
28. Ohtani T, Kusumoto N,Wakabayashi K, Yamada S, Nakamura T, Kumazawa Y, et al. Application of haptic device to implant dentistry-accuracy verification of drilling into a pig bone. Dent Mater J 2009;28:75-81.
29. Choi JY, Choi JH, Kim NK, Kim Y, Lee JK, Kim MK, et al. Analysis of errors in medical rapid prototyping models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:23-32.
30. Suri S, Utreja A, Khandelwal N, Mago SK. Craniofacial computerized tomography analysis of the midface of patients with repaired complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:418-29.
31. Park HS. An anatomical study using CT images for the implantation of micro-implants. Korean J Orthod 2002;32:435-41.
32. Carano A, Velo S, Incorvati C, Poggio P. Clinical applications of the mini-screw-anchorage-system (M.A.S.) in the maxillary alveolar bone. Prog Orthod 2004;5:212-35.
33. Rudolph H, Luthardt RG, Walter MH. Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD/CAM technology. Comput Biol Med 2007;37: 579-87.
34. Houston WJB. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod 1983;83:382-90.