Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement

Clinical Anatomy

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 486-491

  Lim, Ju Eun ^a   Won, Hee Lim ^b   Yoon, Sic Chun ^c  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^c Mokdong Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Cortical bone thickness; Different insertion angle; Root proximity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALVEOLAR BONE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORTICAL BONE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMPLANT; INCISOR; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MAXILLA; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 50949095202     PISSN: 08973806     EISSN: 10982353     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ca.20671     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T. 2006. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129:721.e7-721.e12.
2. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. 2007. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131:S43-S51.
3. Kuroda S, Sugawara Y, Deguchi T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T. 2007a. Clinical use of miniscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: Success rates and postoperative discomfort. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131:9-15.
4. Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, Hashimoto T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T. 2007b. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 131:S68-S73.
5. Kyung HM, Park HS, Bae SM, Sung JH, Kim IB. 2003. Development of orthodontic micro-implants for intraoral anchorage. J Clin Orthod 37:321-328.
6. Lim WH, Lee SK, Wikesjo UM, Chun YS. 2007. A descriptive tissue evaluation at maxillary interradicular sites: Implications for orthodontic mini-implant placement. Clin Anat 20:760-765.
7. Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. 2004. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126:42-47.
8. Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. 2003. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 124:373-378.
9. Park HS. 2002. An anatomical study using CT images for the implantation of micro-implants. Korean J Orthod 32:435-441.
10. Park HS, Bae SM, Kyung HM, Sung JH. 2001. Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of skeletal Class I bialveolar protrusion. J Clin Orthod 35:417-422.
11. Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. 2006a. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 130:18-25.
12. Park YC, Kim JK, Lee JS. 2006b. Atlas of Contemporary Orthodontics. 3rd Ed. Seoul: Shinheung International. p 19, 22-23, 145, 148, 152-155, 157, 159-161, 178.
13. Poggio PM, Incorvati C, Velo S, Carano A. 2006. "Safe zones": A guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch. Angle Orthod 76:191-197.
14. Schnelle MA, Beck FM, Jaynes RM, Huja SS. 2004. A radiographic evaluation of the availability of bone for placement of miniscrews. Angle Orthod 74:832-837.