Attitudes toward online social connection and self-disclosure as predictors of facebook communication and relational closeness

Communication Research

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 27-53

  Ledbetter, Andrew M ^a   Mazer, Joseph P ^b   DeGroot, Jocelyn M ^c   Meyer, Kevin R ^d   Mao, Yuping ^e   Swafford, Brian ^f  

^a TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY EDWARDSVILLE   (United States)

^d ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^f OHIO UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

attitude; closeness; Facebook; online communication; social network sites

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650977525     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650210365537     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In P. Golle & G. Danezis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th workshop on privacy enhancing technologies (pp. 36-58). Cambridge, UK: Robinson College.
2. Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Henry Holt.
3. Aron, A.P., Mashek, D.J., & Aron, E.N. (2004). Closeness as including other in the self. In D. J. Mashek & A. Aron (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 27-41). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5. Baym, N.K., & Ledbetter, A.M. (2009). Tunes that bind? Predicting friendship strength in a music-based social network. Information, Communication & Society, 12, 408-427.
6. Baym, N.K., Zhang, Y.B., & Lin, M.-C. (2004). Social interactions across media: Interpersonal communication on the internet, telephone, and face-to-face. New Media & Society, 6, 299-318.
7. boyd, d. m., & Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13. Retrieved June 9, 2008, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html.
8. Burleson, B.R., & MacGeorge, E.L. (2002). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (3rd ed., pp. 374-424). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9. Caplan, S.E. (2002). Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being: Development of a theory-based cognitive-behavioral measure. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 533-575.
10. Caplan, S.E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30, 625-648.
11. Caplan, S.E. (2007). Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 234-242.
12. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Donath, J. (2007). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13. Retrieved June 9, 2009, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/donath.html.
14. Dunbar, R. (1998). Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. London: Faber and Faber.
15. Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends": Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12. Retrieved June 9, 2009, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html.
16. Facebook.com. (2009). Retrieved June 3, 2009, from www.facebook.com.
17. Fischer, C.S. (1992). America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California.
18. Hargittai, E. (2007). Whose space? Differences among users and non-users of social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13. Retrieved June 9, 2009, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/hargittai.html.
19. Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8, 125-147.
20. Henry, F. (2007, January 15). How do you define a friend? Newhouse News Service. Retrieved September 22, 2008, from LexisNexis Academic.
21. Ho, S.S., & McLeod, D.M. (2008). Social-psychological influences on opinion expression in face-to-face and computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 35, 190-207.
22. Johnson, A.J., Wittenberg, E., Villagran, M.M., Mazur, M., & Villagran, P. (2003). Relational progression as a dialectic: Examining turning points in communication among friends. Communication Monographs, 70, 230-249.
23. Joinson, A.N. (2001). Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 177-192.
24. Kelly, L., & Keaten, J.A. (2007). Development of the affect for communication channels scale. Journal of Communication, 57, 349-365.
25. Kenny, D.A., Kashy, D.A., & Cook, W.L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford.
26. Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
27. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukhopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017-1031.
28. Laurenceau, J.-P., Barrett, L.F., & Pietromonaco, P.R. (1998). Intimacy as an interpersonal process: The importance of self-disclosure, partner disclosure, and perceived partner responsiveness in interpersonal exchanges. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1238-1251.
29. Ledbetter, A.M. (2009a). Family communication patterns and relational maintenance behavior: Direct and mediated associations with friendship closeness. Human Communication Research, 35, 130-147.
30. Ledbetter, A.M. (2009b). Measuring online communication attitude: Instrument development and validation. Communication Monographs, 76, 463-486.
31. Ledbetter, A.M. (2009c). Patterns of media use and multiplexity: Associations with sex, geographic distance, and friendship interdependence. New Media & Society, 11, 1187-1208.
32. Ledbetter, A.M., Griffin, E., & Sparks, G.G. (2007). Forecasting friends forever: A longitudinal investigation of sustained closeness between college best friends. Personal Relationships, 14, 343-350.
33. Lee, W.-N., & Choi, S.M. (2005). The role of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism in online consumers' response toward persuasive communication on the Web. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11. Retrieved June 9, 2009, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue1/wnlee.html.
34. Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Teens, privacy and online social networks: How teens manage their online identities and personal information in the age of MySpace. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/211/report_display.asp.
35. Ling, R., & Yttri, B. (2002). Hyper-coordination via mobile phones in Norway. In J. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 139-69). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved June 9, 2009, from http://www.richardling.com/papers/2002_Nobody_sits_at_home_and_waits.pdf.
36. Little, T.D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(5), 53-76.
37. Little, T.D., Card, N.A., Bovaird, J.A., Preacher, K., & Crandall, C.S. (2007). Structural equation modeling of mediation and moderation with contextual factors. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 207-230). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Little, T.D., Cunningham, W.A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K.F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
39. Little, T.D., Slegers, D.W., & Card, N.A. (2006). A non-arbitrary method of identifying and scaling latent variables in SEM and MACS models. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 59-72.
40. Liu, H. (2007). Social network profiles as taste performances. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13. Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/liu.html.
41. Marsh, H.W., Wen, Z., Hau, K.-T., Little, T.D., Bovaird, J.A., & Widaman, K.F. (2007). Unconstrained structural equation models of latent interactions: Contrasting residual- and mean-centered approaches. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 570-580.
42. Mazer, J.P., Murphy, R.E., & Simonds, C.J. (2007). I'll see you on Facebook: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56, 1-17.
43. McCroskey, J.C., & Young, T.J. (1979). The use and abuse of factor analysis in communication research. Human Communication Research, 5, 375-382.
44. McKenna, K.Y.A., Green, A.S., & Gleason, M.E.J. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? Journal of Social Issues, 58, 659-671.
45. Mesch, G., & Talmud, I. (2006). The quality of online and offline relationships: The role of multiplexity and duration of social relationships. The Information Society, 22, 137-148.
46. Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2003). Loneliness and social uses of the Internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 659-671.
47. Nie, N.H., Hillygus, D.S., & Erbring, L. (2002). Internet use, interpersonal relations, and sociability. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 215-243). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
48. O'Sullivan, P.B. (2000). What you don't know won't hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26, 403-431.
49. Parks, M.R. (2006). Personal relationships and personal networks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
50. Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. Albany: State University of New York.
51. Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1998). Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 25, 689-715.
52. Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717-731.
53. Quan-Haase, A. (2007). University students' local and distant social ties: Using and integrating modes of communication on campus. Information, Communication & Society, 10, 671-693.
54. Quan-Haase, A., Wellman, B., Witte, J.C., & Hampton, K.N. (2002). Capitalizing on the net: Social contact, civic engagement, and sense of community. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 291-324). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
55. Ramirez, A., Jr., & Broneck, K. (2009). IM me: Instant messaging as relational maintenance and everyday communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 291-314.
56. Rawlins, W.K. (1992). Friendship matters: Communication, dialectics, and the life course. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine.
57. Rohlfing, M.E. (1995). Doesn't anybody stay in one place anymore? An exploration of the under-studied phenomenon of long-distance relationships. In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Under-studied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 173-196). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
58. Rokeach, M. (1968). Beliefs, attitudes, and values: A theory of organization and change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
59. Sawhney, H. (2007). Strategies for increasing the conceptual yield of new technologies research. Communication Monographs, 74, 395-401.
60. Scott, C.R., & Timmerman, C.E. (2005). Relating computer, communication, and computer-mediated communication apprehensions to new communication technology use in the workplace. Communication Research, 32, 683-725.
61. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York: John Wiley.
62. Smith, A., & Rainie, L. (2008). The Internet and the 2008 election. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/252/report_display.asp.
63. Soliz, J., & Harwood, J. (2006). Shared family identity, age salience and intergroup contact: Investigation of the grandparent-grandchild relationship. Communication Monographs, 73, 87-107.
64. Spitzberg, B.H. (2006). Preliminary development of a model and measure of computer-mediated communication (CMC) competence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 629-666.
65. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1511.
66. Stern, L.A., & Taylor, K. (2007). Social networking on Facebook. Journal of the Communication, Speech & Theater Association of North Dakota, 20, 9-20.
67. Tilsner, J. (2008, September 15). Overrated: Social networking can't replace a face to face. WalletPop. Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http://www.walletpop.com/blog/2008/09/15/overrated-in-america-social-networking.
68. Tong, S.T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., & Walther, J.B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 531-549.
69. Tufekci, Z. (2008). Grooming, gossip, Facebook and MySpace: What can we learn about these sites from those who won't assimilate? Information, Communication & Society, 11, 544-564.
70. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. New York: Simon & Schuster.
71. Valkenburg, P.M., & Peter, J. (2007). Preadolescents' and adolescents' online communication and their closeness to friends. Developmental Psychology, 43, 267-277.
72. Valkenburg, P.M., & Peter, J. (2008). Adolescents' identity experiments on the Internet. Communication Research, 35, 208-231.
73. Vanderberg, R.J., & Lance, C.E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4-70.
74. Vangelisti, A.L., & Caughlin, J.P. (1997). Revealing family secrets: The influence of topic, function, and relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 679-707.
75. Vriens, M., & Melton, E. (2002). Managing missing data. Marketing Research, 14, 12-17.
76. Walther, J.B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-43.
77. Walther, J.B., & Boyd, S. (2002). Attraction to computer-mediated social support. In C. A. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 153-188). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
78. Walther, J.B., & Burgoon, J.K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
79. Walther, J.B., & Parks, M.R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
80. Walther, J.B., Van Der Heide, B., Kim, S., Westerman, D., & Tong, S.T. (2008). The role of friends' behavior on evaluations of individuals' Facebook profiles: Are we known by the company we keep? Human Communication Research, 34, 28-49.
81. Walther, J.B., Van Der Heide, B., Hamel, L.M., & Shulman, H.C. (2009). Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: A test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research, 36, 229-253.
82. Wheeless, L.R., Eddleman-Spears, L., Magness, L.D., & Preiss, R.W. (2005). Informational reception apprehension and information from technology aversion: Development and test of a new construct. Communication Quarterly, 53, 143-158.
83. Wheeless, L.R., & Grotz, J. (1976). Conceptualization and measurement of reported self-disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2, 338-346.
84. Wright, K., Craig, E., Cunningham, C., Igiel, M., & Ploeger, N. (2008, November). Will you (still) be my friend?: Computer-mediated relational maintenance on Facebook.com. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
85. Zhang, D., Lowry, P.B., Zhou, L., & Fu, X. (2007). The impact of individualism-collectivism, social presence, and group diversity on group decision making under majority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23, 53-80.
86. Zuckerberg, M. (2006, September 8). An open letter from Mark Zuckerberg. Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=2208562130.
87. Zuckerberg, M. (2008, September 18). Thoughts on the evolution of Facebook. Retrieved June 8, 2009, from http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=31033537130.