Development of the affect for communication channels scale

Journal of Communication

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 349-365

  Kelly, Lynne ^a   Keaten, James A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER;

EID: 34250220613     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00346.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
2. Birnie, S. A., & Horvath, P. (2002). Psychological predictors of Internet social communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7. Retrieved September 8, 2003, from http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol7/issue4/horvath.html
3. Buss, A. (1997). A dual conception of shyness. In J. A. Daly, J. C. McCroskey, J. Ayres, T. Hopf, & D. M. Ayres (Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (2nd ed., pp. 109-127). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
4. Carducci, B. J., & Zimbardo, P. G. (1995). Are you shy? Psychology Today, 28, 34-45, 64-70, 78-82.
5. Internet World Stats. (2005). United States of America Internet usage and broadband usage report. Retrieved July 15, 2005, from http://www.internetworldstats.com/am/us.htm
6. Keaten, J. A., & Kelly, L. (2000). Reticence: An affirmation and revision. Communication Education, 49, 165-177.
7. Keaten, J. A., Kelly, L., & Begnal, C. (1995, November). Effects of the Penn State Reticence Program on communication behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX.
8. Keaten, J. A., Kelly, L., Begnal, C., Heller, D., & Walker, A. (1993, November). Development of an instrument to measure reticence. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Miami, FL.
9. Keaten, J. A., Kelly, L., & Finch, C. (1997). Development of an instrument to measure reticence. Communication Quarterly, 45, 37-54.
10. Keaten, J. A., Kelly, L., & Phillips, G. M. (in press). Reticence: A perspective on social withdrawal. In J. A. Daly, J. C. McCroskey, J. Ayres, T. Hopf, & D. M. Ayres (Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (3rd ed.). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
11. Kelly, L., Duran, R. L., & Zolten, J. J. (2001). The effect of reticence on college students' use of electronic mail to communicate with faculty. Communication Education, 50, 170-176.
12. Kelly, L., & Keaten, J. A. (1992). A test of the effectiveness of the Reticence Program at the Pennsylvania State University. Communication Education, 41, 361-374.
13. Kelly, L., Keaten, J. A., & Finch, C. (2004). Reticent and nonreticent college students' preferred communication channels for interacting with faculty. Communication Research Reports, 21, 197-209.
14. Kelly, L., Keaten, J. A., & Palmer, D. L. (2003, November). The impact of reticence on use of computer-mediated communication. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Communication Association, Miami Beach, FL.
15. Lenhart, A., Horrigan, J., Rainie, L., Allen, K., Boyce, A., Madden, M, et al. 2003). The ever-shifting Internet population: A new look at Internet access and the digital divide. The Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved July 15,2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/88/report_display.asp
16. Lenhart, A., Lewis, O., & Rainie, L. (2003). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant-messaging generation and the Internet's impact on friendships and family relationships. In K. M. Galvin & P. J. Cooper (Eds.), Making connections (3rd ed., pp. 354-361). Los Angeles: Roxbury.
17. O'Sullivan, P. B. (2000). What you don't know won't hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26, 403-431.
18. Perse, E. M., & Courtright, J. A. (1993). Normative images of communication media: Mass and interpersonal channels in the new media environment. Human Communication Research, 19, 485-503.
19. Phillips, G. M. (1965). The problem of reticence. Pennsylvania Speech Annual, 22, 22-38.
20. Phillips, G. M. (1997). Reticence: A perspective on social withdrawal. In J. A. Daly, J. C. McCroskey, J. Ayres, T. Hopf, & D. M. Ayres (Eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (2nd ed., pp. 129-150). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
21. Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19, 451-484.
22. Roberts, L. D., Smith, L. M., & Pollock, C. M. (2000). 'U r a lot bolder on the Net.' In W. R. Crozier (Ed.), Shyness: Development, consolidation and change (pp. 121-138). New York: Routledge.
23. Scealy, M., Phillips, J. G., & Stevenson, R. (2002). Shyness and anxiety as predictors of patterns of Internet usage. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 5, 507-515.
24. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Stritzke, W. G. K., Nguyen, A., & Durkin, K. (2004). Shyness and computer-mediated communication: A self-presentational theory perspective. Media Psychology, 6, 1-22.
26. Trevino, L. K., Lengel, R. H., & Daft, R. L. (1987). Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Communication Research, 14, 553-575.
27. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Home computers and Internet use in the United States: August 2000. Retrieved July 15, 2005, from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/computer.html
28. Utz, S. (2000). Social information processing in MUDS: The development of friendships in virtual worlds. Journal of Online Behavior, 1, 24, Retrieved July 30, 2003, from http://www.behavior.net/JOB/v1n1/utz.html
29. Westmyer, S. A., DiCioccio, R. L., & Rubin, R. B. (1998). Appropriateness and effectiveness of communication channels in competent interpersonal communication. Journal of Communication, 48, 27-48.