Small-group learning in an upper-level university biology class enhances academic performance and student attitudes toward group work

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 12, 2010, Pages

  Gaudet, Andrew D ^a   Ramer, Leanne M ^a   Nakonechny, Joanne ^a   Cragg, Jacquelyn J ^a   Ramer, Matt S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; EDUCATION; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; NEUROBIOLOGY; STUDENT ATTITUDE; UNIVERSITY STUDENT; ATTITUDE; BIOLOGY; COGNITION; CURRICULUM; FEMALE; LEARNING; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; STUDENT; TEACHING;

ATTITUDE; BIOLOGY; COGNITION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; FEMALE; GOALS; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

EID: 78650830816     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015821     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Di Carlo SE (2006) Cell biology should be taught as science is practised. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 290-296.
2. Wood WB (2009) Revising the AP Biology Curriculum. Science 325: 1627-1628.
3. National Research Council Committee on Undergraduate Biology Education to Prepare Research Scientists for the 21st Century (2003) BIO 2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists. Washington, DC: National Academy.
4. Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR (2004) How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
5. Cortright RN, Collins HL, Rodenbaugh DW, Di Carlo SE (2003) Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative-group testing. Adv Physiol Educ 27: 102-108.
6. Rao SP, Di Carlo SE (2001) Active learning of respiratory physiology improves performance on respiratory physiology examinations. Adv Physiol Educ 25: 127-133.
7. Rao SP, Di Carlo SE (2000) Peer instruction improves performance on quizzes. Adv Physiol Educ 24: 51-55.
8. Giuliodori MJ, Lujan HL, Di Carlo SE (2008) Collaborative Group Testing Benefits High-and Low-Performing Students. Advances in Physiology Education 32: 274-278.
9. Springer L, Donovan SS, Stanne ME (1999) Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research 69: 21-51.
10. Michael J (2006) Where's the Evidence that Active Learning Works? Advances in Physiology Education 30: 159-167.
11. Tanner K, Chatman LS, Allen D (2003) Approaches to cell biology teaching: cooperative learning in the science classroom-beyond students working in groups. Cell Biology Education 2: 1-5.
12. Rutherford FJ, Ahlgren A (1991) Science for All Americans. Oxford University Press.
13. Smith KA, Sheppard SD, Johnson DW, Johnson RT (2005) Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education 94: 87-101.
14. Michaelsen LK (2002) Getting Started with Team-Based Learning. 52 p.
15. Volkmann MJ, Eichinger DC (1999) Habits of Mind: Integrating the Social and Personal Characteristics of Doing Science into the Science Classroom. School Science and Mathematics 99: 141-147.
16. Kouros C, Abrami PC (2006) How do students really feel about working in small groups? The role of student attitudes and behaviours in cooperative classroom settings.
17. Johnson DW, Maruyama G, Johnson R, Nelson D, Skon L (1981) Effects of Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Goal Structures on Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin 89: 47-62.
18. Druckman D, Bjork RA (1994) Learning, Remembering, Believing. Enhancing Human Performance. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
19. Johnson DW, Johnson RT, Smith KA (1998) Active Learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
20. Carini RM, Kuh GD, Klein SP (2006) Student engagement and student learning: testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education 47: 1-32.
21. Slavin RE (1996) Research on cooperative learning and achievement: What we know, what we need to know. Contemporary Educational Psychology 21: 43-69.
22. Giuliodori MJ, Lujan HL, Di Carlo SE (2006) Peer instruction enhanced student performance on qualitative problem-solving questions. Adv Physiol Educ 30: 168-173.
23. Giuliodori MJ, Lujan HL, Di Carlo SE (2009) Student interaction characteristics during collaborative group testing. Adv Physiol Educ 33: 24-29.
24. Smith MK, Wood WB, Adams WK, Wieman C, Knight JK, et al. (2009) Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions. Science 323: 122-124.
25. Gokhale AA (1995) Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education 7: 22-30.
26. Heller P, Keith R, Anderson S (1992) Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving. American Journal of Physics 60: 627-636.
27. Cooper MM (1995) Cooperative Learning: An Approach for Large Enrollment Courses. Journal of Chemical Education 72: 162-164.
28. Feichtner SB, Davis EA (1984) Why Some Groups Fail: a Survey of Students' Experiences with Learning Groups. Journal of Management Education 9: 58-.
29. Lord T (1998) Cooperative Learning That Really Works in Biology Teaching: Using Constructivist-Based Activities To Challenge Student Teams. American Biology Teacher 60: 580-588.