Future distribution modelling: A stitch in time is not enough

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 222, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 567-572

  Stankowski, Philippe A ^a   Parker, William H ^a  

^a LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Climate change; Extinction risk; Extirpation; Logistic regression; Redistribution; Salix (willow); Species distribution modelling; Species climate equilibrium; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EXTINCTION RISKS; EXTIRPATION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION; REDISTRIBUTION; SALIX (WILLOW); SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELLING; SPECIES/CLIMATE EQUILIBRIUM; UNCERTAINTY;

BIODIVERSITY; CLIMATE MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

CLIMATE CHANGE;

BIODIVERSITY; CLIMATE CHANGE; DATA SET; EXTINCTION RISK; GRASS; HABITAT MANAGEMENT; LOGISTICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; UNDERPINNING;

CANADA; ONTARIO [CANADA];

SALIX;

EID: 78650678346     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.10.018     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Anderson R.P., Lew D., Townsend Peterson A. Evaluating predictive models of species' distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecol. Model. 2003, 162:211-232.
2. Araújo M.B., Guisan A. Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling. J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33:1677-1688.
3. Argus G.W. Salix (Salicaceae) distribution maps and a synopsis of their classification in North America, north of Mexico. Harvard Papers Bot. 2007, 12:335-368.
4. Austin M.P. Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecol. Model. 2002, 157:101-118.
5. Austin M.P., Belbin L., Meyers J.A., Doherty M.D., Luoto M. Evaluation of statistical models used for predicting plant species distributions: role of artificial data and theory. Ecol. Model. 2006, 199:197-216.
6. Bakkenes M., Alkemade J.R.M., Ihle F., Leemans R., Latour J.B. Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050. Global Change Biol. 2002, 8:390-407.
7. Beaumont L.J., Pitman A.J., Poulsen M., Hughes L. Where will species go? Incorporating new advances in climate modelling into projections of species distributions. Global Change Biol. 2007, 13:1368-1385.
8. Beever E.A., Ray C., Mote P.W., Wilkening J.L. Testing alternative models of climate-mediated extirpations. Ecol. Appl. 2010, 20:164-178.
9. Biggs R., Simons H., Bakkenes M., Scholes R.J., Eickhout B., Vuuren, van D., Alkemande R. Scenarios of biodiversity loss in southern Africa in the 21st century. Global Environ. Chang. 2008, 18:296-309.
10. Burns C.E., Johnston K.M., Schmitz O.J. Global climate change and mammalian species diversity in U.S. national parks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:11474-11477.
11. Calef M.P., McGuire A.D., Epstein H.E., Rupp T.S., Shugart H.H. Analysis of vegetation distribution in Interior Alaska and sensitivity to climate change using a logistic regression approach. J. Biogeogr. 2005, 32:863-878.
12. Cumming G.S. Using between-model comparisons to fine-tune linear models of species ranges. J. Biogeogr. 2000, 27:441-455.
13. Darwin C.R. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life 1859, John Murray, London.
14. Elith J., Graham C.H., Anderson R.P., Dudik M., Ferrier S., Guisan A., Hijmans R.J., Huettmann F., Leathwick J.R., Lehmann A., Li J., Lohmann L.G., Loiselle B.A., Manion G., Moritz C., Nakamura M., Nakazawa Y., Overton J.McC., Peterson A.T., Phillips S.J., Richardson K., Scachetti-Pereira R., Schapire R.E., Soberón J., Williams S., Wisz M.S., Zimmermann N.E. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distribution from occurrence data. Ecography 2006, 29:129-151.
15. ESRI ArcGIS Desktop 9.2 2006, Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., Redlands, CA.
16. Feeley K.J., Silman M.R. Modelling the responses of Andean and Amazonian plant species to climate change: the effects of georeferencing errors and the importance of data filtering. J. Biogeogr. 2010, 37:733-740.
17. Graham C.H., Elith J., Hijmans R.J., Guisan A., Peterson A.T., Loiselle B.A. The influence of spatial errors in species occurrence data using in distribution models. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45:239-247. the NCEAS Predicting Species Distributions Working Group.
18. Grinnell J. The niche-relationships of the California thrasher. Auk 1917, 34:427-433.
19. Guisan A., Graham C.H., Elith J., Huettmann F. Sensitivity of predictive species distribution models to change in grain size. Divers. Distrib. 2007, 13:332-340. the NCEAS Species Distribution Modelling Group.
20. Hales S., de Wet N., Maindonald J., Woodward A. Potential effect of population and climate changes on global distribution of dengue fever: an empirical model. Lancet 2002, http://image.thelancet.com/extras/01art11175web.pdf.
21. Hamann A., Wang T. Potential effects of climate change on ecosystem and tree species distribution in British Columbia. Ecology 2006, 87:2773-2786.
22. Heikkinen R.K., Luoto M., Araújo M.B., Virkkala R., Thuiller W., Sykes M.T. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2006, 30:751-777.
23. Hijmans R.J., Graham C.H. The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Global Change Biol. 2006, 12:2272-2281.
24. Iverson L.R., Prasad A.M. Predicting abundance for 80 tree species following climate change in the Eastern United States. Ecol. Monogr. 1998, 68:465-485.
25. Joyner T.A., Lukhnova L., Pazilov Y., Temiralyeva G., Hugh-Jones M.E., Aikimbayev A., Blackburn J.K. Modeling the potential distribution of Bacillus anthracis under multiple climate change scenarios for Kazakhstan. PLoS One 2010, 5:e9596. 10.1371/journal.pone.0009596.
26. Loiselle B.A., Howell C.A., Graham C.H., Goerck J.M., Brooks T., Smith K.G., Williams P.H. Avoiding pitfalls of using species distribution models in conservation planning. Conserv. Biol. 2003, 17:1591-1600.
27. Loiselle B.A., Jørgensen P.M., Consiglio T., Jiménez I., Blake J.G., Lohmann L.G., Montiel O.M. Predicting species distributions from herbarium collections: does climate bias in collection sampling influence model outcomes?. J. Biogeogr. 2008, 35:105-116.
28. Malcolm J.R., Liu C., Neilson R.P., Hansen L., Hannah L. Global warming and extinctions of endemic species from biodiversity hotspots. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20:538-548.
29. Manel S., Williams H.C., Ormerod S.J. Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. J. Appl. Ecol. 2001, 38:921-931.
30. McKenney D.W., Pedlar J.H., Lawrence K., Campbell K., Hutchinson M.F. Potential impacts of climate change on the distribution of North American trees. Bioscience 2007, 57:939-948.
31. McPherson J.M., Jetz W., Rogers D.J. The effects of species' range size on the accuracy of distribution models: ecological phenomenon or statistical artifact?. J. Appl. Ecol. 2004, 41:811-823.
32. Meynard C.N., Quinn J.F. Predicting species distributions: a critical comparison of the most common statistical models using artificial species. J. Biogeogr. 2007, 34:1455-1469.
33. Oldham M.J., Brinker S.R. Rare Vascular Plants of Ontario 2009, Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario. 4th ed.
34. Pearce J., Ferrier S. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol. Model. 2000, 133:225-245.
35. Pearson R.G., Thuiller W., Araújo M.B., Martinez-Meyer E., Brotons L., McClean C., Miles L., Seguardo P., Dawson T.P., Lees D.C. Model-based uncertainty in species range prediction. J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33:1704-1711.
36. Pearson R.G., Dawson T.P. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2003, 12:361-371.
37. Pearson R.G., Dawson T.P., Berry P.M., Harrison P.A. SPECIES: a spatial evaluation of climate impact on the envelope of species. Ecol. Model. 2002, 154:289-300.
38. Pennington D. Representing the dimensions of an ecological niche. Proceedings of the 5th International Semantic Web 2006.
39. Peterson A.T., Cohoon K.P. Sensitivity of distributional prediction algorithms to geographic completeness. Ecol. Model. 1999, 117:159-164.
40. Peterson A.T., Ortega-Huerta M.A., Bartley J., Sánchez-Cordero V., Soberón J., Buddemeier R.H., Stockwell D.R.B. Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios. Nature 2002, 416:626-629.
41. Peterson A.T., Stewart A., Mohamed K.I., Araújo M.B. Shifting global invasive potential of European plants with climate change. PLoS One 2008, 3:e2441. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002441.
42. Price, D., McKenney, D., Joyce, L., Siltanen, M., Papadopol, P., Lawrence, K., n.d. High resolution interpolation of IPCC AR4 GCMs for Canada. Canadian Forest Service Report, Edmonton.
43. Raper S.C.B., Giorgi F. Climate Change Projections and Models in Climate Change and Biodiversity 2005, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 199-210.
44. Rehfeldt G.E., Crookston N.L., Warwell M.V., Evans J.S. Empirical analyses of plant-climate relationships for the western United States. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2006, 167:1123-1150.
45. SAS Institute Inc. SAS 9.2 System for Unix 2008, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
46. Stankowski P.A., Parker W.H. Species distribution modelling: does one size fit all? A phytogeographic analysis of Salix in Ontario. Ecol. Model. 2010, 221:1655-1664.
47. Stockwell D.R.B., Townsend Peterson A. Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecol. Model. 2002, 148:1-13.
48. Thomas C.D., Cameron A., Green R.E., Bakkenes M., Beaumont L.J., Collingham Y.C., Erasmus B.F.N., de Siqueria M.F., Grainger A., Hannah L., Hughes L., Huntley B., van Jaarsveld A.S., Midgley G.F., Miles L., Ortega-Huerta M.A., Peterson A.T., Phillips O.L., Williams S.E. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 2004, 427:145-148.
49. Thuiller W., Lavorel S., Araújo M.B., Sykes M.T., Prentice C. Climate change threats to plant diversity in Europe. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:8245-8250.
50. Tokumine S. Bioclimatic Modelling of Sub-Saharan African Plants. Progress Report to Conservation International, September 2002 2002, Centre for Ecology Law and Policy, Environmental Department, University of York, UK.