Species distribution modelling: Does one size fit all? A phytogeographic analysis of Salix in Ontario

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 221, Issue 13-14, 2010, Pages 1655-1664

  Stankowski, Philippe A ^a   Parker, William H ^a  

^a LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

BIOCLIM; Continuous data; Discontinuous data; Logistic regression; Model validation; Occurrence probability; Over prediction index; Slix; Willow

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE MODELS; CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY; FORECASTING; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

BIOCLIM; CONTINUOUS DATA; DISCONTINUOUS DATA; LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS; MODEL VALIDATION; OCCURRENCE PROBABILITY; PREDICTION INDICES; SLIX; WILLOW;

POPULATION DISTRIBUTION;

ALGORITHM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA SET; DECIDUOUS TREE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FIELD SURVEY; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; HABITAT CORRIDOR; MODEL VALIDATION; NICHE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PHYTOGEOGRAPHY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEASONALITY; SPECIES CONSERVATION; TOLERANCE;

CANADA; ONTARIO [CANADA];

SALIX; SALIX HERBACEA;

EID: 78650680035     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.03.016     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anderson, R.P., Lew, D., Peterson, A.T., 2003. Evaluating predictive models of species' distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models. Ecol. Model. 162, 211-232.
2. Araújo, M.B., Pearson, R.G., Thullier, W., Erhard, M., 2005. Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change. Global Change Biol. 11, 1504-1513.
3. Argus, G.W., 2007. Salix (Salicaceae) Distribution maps and a synopsis of their classification in North America, north of Mexico. Harvard Papers Bot. 12, 335-368.
4. Argus, G.W., 2006. Guide to Salix (Willow) in the Canadian Maritime Provinces (New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island), http://aknhp.uaa.alaska.edu/willow/pdfs/GuideMaritimeSalix28JUN06.pdf (downloaded April 2008).
5. Betts, R.A., Shugart, H.H., 2005. Dynamic ecosystem and earth system models. In: Lovejoy, T.E., Hannah, L. (Eds.), Climate Change and Biodiversity. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp. 232-251.
6. Box, E.O., 1981. Predicting physiognomic vegetation types with climate variables. Vegetatio 45, 127-139.
7. Bakkenes, M., Alkemade, J.R.M., Ihle, F., Leemans, R., Latour, J.B., 2002. Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050. Global Change Biol. 8, 390-407.
8. Calef, M.P., McGuire, A.D., Epstein, H.E., Rupp, T.S., Shugart, H.H., 2005. Analysis of vegetation distribution in interior Alaska and sensitivity to climate change using a logistic regression approach. J. Biogeogr. 32, 863-878.
9. Cumming, G.S., 2000. Using between-model comparisons to fine-tune linear models of species ranges. J. Biogeogr. 27, 441-455.
10. Davis, M.B., Shaw, R.G., Etterson, J.R., 2005. Evolutionary responses to changing climate. Ecology 86, 1704-1714.
11. ESRI, 2008. ArcGIS Desktop 9.2. Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., Redlands, CA.
12. Fielding, A.H., Bell, J.F., 1997. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv. 24, 38-49.
13. Flantua, S.G.A., van Boxel, J.H., Hooghiemstra, H., van Smaalen, J., 2007. Application of GIS and logistic regression to fossil pollen data in modelling present and past spatial distribution of the Columbian savanna. Clim. Dynam. 29, 697-712.
14. Heikkinen, R.K., Luoto, M., Araújo, M.B., Virkkala, R., Thuiller, W., Sykes, M.T., 2006. Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 30, 751-777.
15. Hijmans, R.J., Graham, C.H., 2006. The ability of climate envelope models to predict the effect of climate change on species distributions. Global Change Biol. 12, 2272-2281.
16. Hutchinson, G.E., 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Springs Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 22, 415-427.
17. Ibáñez, I., Clark, J.S., Dietze, M.C., Feeley, K., Hersh, M., LaDeau, S., McBride, A., Welch, N.E., Wolosin, M.S., 2005. Predicting biodiversity change: outside the climate envelope, beyond the species-area curve. Ecology 87, 1896-1906.
18. Iverson, L.R., Prasad, A.M., 1998. Predicting abundance for 80 tree species following climate change in the eastern United States. Ecol. Monogr. 68, 465-485.
19. Jones, M.H., Macdonald, S.E., Henry, G.H.R., 1999. Sex- and habitat-specific responses of a high arctic willow, Salix arctica, to experimental climate change. Oikos 87, 129-138.
20. Kevan, P.G., 1990. Sexual differences in temperature of blossoms on a dioecious plant, Salix arctica: significance for life in the arctic. Arctic Alpine Res. 22, 283-289.
21. Manel, S., Williams, H.C., Ormerod, S.J., 2001. Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. J. Appl. Ecol. 38, 921-931.
22. McPherson, J.M., Jetz, W., Rogers, D.J., 2004. The effects of species' range size on the accuracy of distribution models: ecological phenomenon or statistical artifact? J. Appl. Ecol. 41, 811-823.
23. McKenney, D.W., Pedlar, J.H., Lawrence, K., Campbell, K., Hutchinson, M.F., 2007. Potential impacts of climate change on the distribution of North American trees. Bioscience 57, 939-948.
24. Meynard, C.N., Quinn, J.F., 2007. Predicting species distributions: a critical comparison of the most common statistical models using artificial species. J. Biogeogr. 34, 1455-1469.
25. Nix, H.A., 1986. A biogeographic analysis of Australian Elapid Snakes. In: Longmore, R. (Ed.), Atlas of Elapid Snakes of Australia. Australian Flora and Fauna Series Number 7. Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, pp. 4-15.
26. Oldham, M.J., Brinker, S.R., 2009. Rare Vascular Plants of Ontario, 4th ed. Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario.
27. Pearce, J., Ferrier, S., 2000. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecol. Model. 133, 225-245.
28. Pearson, R.G., Dawson, T.P., 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 12, 361-371.
29. Pearson, R.G., Dawson, T.P., Berry, P.M., Harrison, P.A., 2002. SPECIES: a spatial evaluation of climate impact on the envelope of species. Ecol. Model. 154, 289-300.
30. Pearson, R.G., Thuiller, W., Araújo, M.B., Martinez-Meyer, E., Brotons, L., McClean, C., Miles, L., Seguardo, P., Dawson, T.P., Lees, D.C., 2006. Model-based uncertainty in species range prediction. J. Biogeogr. 33, 1704-1711.
31. Pennington, D., 2006. Representing the dimensions of an ecological niche. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Semantic Web Conference Workshop: Terra Cognita-Directions to the Geospatial Semantic Web, November 6,2006, Athens, Georgia.
32. Peterson, A.T., Cohoon, K.P., 1999. Sensitivity of distributional prediction algorithms to geographic data completeness. Ecol. Model. 117, 159-164.
33. Peterson, A.T., Stewart, A., Mohamed, K.I., Araújo, M.B., 2008. Shifting global invasive potential of European plants with climate change. PLoS ONE 3, e2441, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002441.
34. Prasad, A.M., Iverson, L.R., Liaw, A., 2006. Newer classification and regression tree techniques: bagging and random forests for ecological prediction. Ecosystems 9, 181-199.
35. Rehfeldt, G.E., Crookston, N.L., Warwell, M.V., Evans, J.S., 2006. Empirical analyses of plant-climate relationships for the western United States. Int. J. Plant Sci. 167, 1123-1150.
36. SAS Institute Inc., 2007. SAS 9.2 System for Unix. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
37. Soper, J.H., Heimburger, M.L., 1982. Shrubs of Ontario. The Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, pp. 14-85.
38. Stockwell, D., Peters, D., 1999. The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 13, 143-158.
39. Stockwell, D.R.B., Peterson, A.T., 2002. Effects of size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecol. Model. 148, 1-13.
40. Thuiller, W., Lavorel, S., Araújo, M.B., Sykes, M.T., Prentice, C.I., 2005. Climate change threats to plant biodiversity in Europe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 8245-8250, doi:10.1073/pnas.0409902102.
41. Trivedi, M.R., Berry, P.M., Morecroft, M.D., Dawson, T.P., 2008. Spatial scale affects bioclimate model projections of climate change impacts on mountain plants. Global Change Biol. 14, 1089-1103.