E-Government stakeholders - Who are they and what do they want?

International Journal of Information Management

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 53-62

  Rowley, Jennifer ^a  

^a MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

e Government; Stakeholder analysis; Stakeholder benefits; Stakeholder interests; User adoption

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER NETWORKS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EXPLORATORY STUDIES; LITERATURE REVIEWS; STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS; STAKEHOLDER BENEFITS; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER GROUPS; STAKEHOLDER INTEREST; USER ADOPTIONS;

E-GOVERNMENT;

EID: 78650509819     PISSN: 02684012     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.05.005     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (55)

1. P. Adeshara, R. Juric, J. Kuljis, and R. Paul A survey of acceptance of e-government services in the UK Journal of Computing and Information Technology 12 2 2004 143 150 (Pubitemid 39073432)
2. AGIMO Australian government information office: Demand and value assessment 2004 http://www.agimo.gov.au/government/damvam
3. B.A. Allen, J.L. Paquet, and J. Roy E-governance & government on-line in Canada: Partnerships, people and prospects Government Information Quarterly 18 2001 93 104
4. F. Belanger, and Hiller A framework for e-government: Privacy implications Business Process Management Journal 12 1 2006 48 60
5. P. Beynon-Davies Constructing electronic government: The case of the UK Inland Revenue International Journal of Information Management 25 2005 3 20
6. G.A. Boyne Public and private management: What's the difference? Journal of Management Studies 39 1 2002 97 122
7. S. Breschneider Management information systems in public and private organizations - An empirical test Public Administration Review 50 5 1990 536 545
8. M.M. Brown, and J.L. Brudney Achieving advanced electronic government services: An examination of obstacles and implication from an international perspective Paper presented at the National Public Management Research Conference, Bloomington, IN 2001
9. Cabinet Office Modernising government 1999 HMSO London, UK
10. L. Carter E-government diffusion: A comparison of adoption constructs Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 2 3 2008 147 161
11. L. Carter, and F. Belanger The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors Information Systems Journal 15 2005 5 25
12. A.M. Chircu E-government evaluation: Towards a multi-dimensional framework Electronic Government: An International Journal 5 4 2008 345 363
13. C. Codagnone, and T.A. Undheim Benchmarking eGovernment: Tools, theory, and practice European Journal of ePractice 4 2008 (available at www.epracticejournal.eu )
14. CPA (2002). Improving public services through eGovernment. House of Commons Report No. 54 www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/ cmpubacc/845/84503.html.
15. P. Dunleavy, and H. Margetts New public management is dead - Long live digital-era governance Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 3 2006 467 494
16. Y.K. Dwivedi, and M.D. Williams Demographic influences on UK citizens@ e-government adoption Electronic Government: An International Journal 5 3 2008 261 274
17. eGISE (2008). www.iseing.org/iseing/eGISE.htm.
18. L.S. Flak, and S. Nordheim Stakeholders, contradiction and salience: An empirical study of a Norwegian G2G effort Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE 2006
19. L.S. Flak, and J. Rose Stakeholder governance: Adapting stakeholder theory to the e-government field Communication of the Association for Information Systems 16 31 2005 1 46
20. R.E. Freeman Strategic management: A stakeholder approach 1984 Pitman Boston
21. D. Gilbert, P. Balestrini, and D. Littleboy Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government International Journal of Public Sector Management 17 4 2004 286 301
22. R. Heeks Most e-government-for-development projects fail; how can the risk be reduced? 2003 IDPM
23. R. Heeks Understanding and measuring eGovernment: International benchmarking studies Presented at the UDESA workshop, E-Participation and E-Government: Understanding the Present and Creating the Future, Budapest, Hungary, July 2006 2006
24. C. Hood Public management for all seasons Public Administration 69 1 1991 3 19
25. Z. Irani, P.E.D. Love, T. Elliman, S. Jones, and M. Themistocleous Evaluating e-government: Learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities Information Systems Journal 15 2005 61 82
26. Z. Irani, T. Elliman, and P. Jackson Electronic transformation of government in the UK: A research agenda European Journal of Information Systems 16 2007 327 335
27. A. Kosaker, and L. Lee-Kelley Citizen-centric e-government: A critique of the UK model Electronic Government: An International Journal 3 2 2006 127 138
28. C. Leadbeater, and H. Cottam The user generated state: Public services 2.0 2008 (available at: www.charlesleadbeater.net/archive/public-services-20. aspx )
29. L. Lee-Kelley, and A. Kolsaker E-government: The "fit" between supply assumptions and usage drivers Electronic Government: An International Journal 1 2 2004 130 140
30. LGA egov@local: Towards a national strategy for local e-Government 2002 Local Government Association
31. S.J. Martin Engaging with citizens and service users: Communication, consultation and co-production A.G. Bovaird, E. Loeffler, Public Management and Governance. 2003 Routledge London
32. J. Millard EGovernment measurement for policy makers European Journal of ePractice 4 2008 (available at www.epracticejournal.eu )
33. H. Mintzberg Managing government, governing management Harvard Business Review 74 3 1996 75 83
34. R.K. Mitchell, B.R. Agle, and D.J. Wood Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts Academy of Management Review 22 4 1997 853 886
35. NAO Better public services through e-government 2002 National Audit Office
36. ODPM Delivering efficiency in local services: Further guidance for local authorities 2005 Office of the Deputy Prime Minister http://www.odpm.gov.uk/pub/ 531/\deliveringefficiencyinlocalservicesfurtherguidancePDF1129kb-id1135531.pdf
37. ODPM ODPM evidence and innovation strategy 2005-08 2006 Consultation Paper Office of the Deputy Prime Minister http://www.odpm.gov.uk/pub/401/
38. G. Orange, A. Burke, T. Elliman, and A.L. Kor CARE: An integrated framework to support continuous, adaptable, reflective evaluation of e-government systems: A research note Presented at European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, Alicante, Spain, July 2006
39. D. Osimo Benchmarking eGovernment in the Web 2.0 era: What to measure and how European Journal of ePractice 4 2008 (available at www.epracticejournal.eu )
40. A. Payne, D. Ballantyne, and M. Christopher A stakeholder approach to relationship marketing strategy: The development and use of the 'six markets model' European Journal of Marketing 39 7/8 2005 855 871
41. C.G. Reddick Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly 22 2005 38 57
42. J.J. Rohleder, and V. Jup eGovernment leadership; high performance, maximum value 2004 Accenture
43. J. Rowley An analysis of the e-service literature: Towards a research agenda Internet Research 16 3 2006 339 359
44. H.J. Scholl Involving salient stakeholders Action Research 2 3 2004 277 304
45. R. Silcock What is e-government? Parliamentary Affairs 54 2001 88 101
46. F. Slack, and J. Walton Organizational culture and stakeholder power: A case study of postgraduate initiative in e-Government Presented to ICEGOV2008, Cairo, Egypt 2008
47. S.C. Srivastava, and T.S.H. Teo E-government payoffs: Evidence from cross country data Journal of Global Information Management 15 4 2007 20 40
48. C.-W. Tan, S.L. Pan, and E.T.K. Lim Managing stakeholder interests in e-government implementation: Lessons learned form a Singapore e-Government project Journal of Global Information Management 13 1 2005 31 53
49. J.B. Tennert, and A.D. Schroeder Stakeholder analysis Proceedings of 60th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Public Administration 1999
50. R.J. Torraco Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples Human Resource Development 4 3 2005 356 367
51. United Nations Global E-Government Readiness Report 2005 2005
52. United Nations E-government survey 2008; from e-government to connected governance 2008 UN New York
53. P. Wauters, and B. Lorincz User satisfaction and administrative simplification with the perspective of eGovernment: Two faces of the same coin? European Journal of ePractice 4 2008 (available at www.epracticejournal.eu )
54. J. Webster, and R.T. Watson Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review MIS Quarterly 26 2 2002 xiii xxiii
55. M. Yildiz E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward Government Information Quarterly 24 2007 646 655