Stakeholders, contradictions and salience: An empirical study of a norwegian G2G effort

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn 4, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Flak, Leif Skiftenes ^a   Nordheim, Stig ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

E-GOVERNMENT; STAKEHOLDER THEORY (ST);

INFORMATION THEORY; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC POLICY;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 33749626675     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2006.436     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Berman, S.L., Wicks, A.C., Kotha, S., and Jones, T.M. "Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance," Academy of Management Journal (42:5), Oct 1999, pp 488-506.
2. Blair, D. L., & Whitehead, C. J. (1988). Too many on the seesaw. Stakeholder diagnosis and management for hospitals. Hospital and Health Administration, 33(2), 153-166.
3. Boyne, G.A. "Public and private management: What's the difference?" Journal of Management Studies (39:1), Jan 2002b, pp97-122.
4. Bretschneider, S. "Management-Information-Systems in Public and Private Organizations - an Empirical-Test," Public Administration Review (50:5), Sep-Oct 1990, pp 536-545.
5. Burn, J., and Robins, G. "Moving towards e-government: A case study of organisational change processes," Logistics Information Management (16:1) 2003, pp 25-35.
6. Coe, A., Paquet, G., and Roy, J. "E-governance and smart communities - A social learning challenge," Social Science Computer Review (19:1), Spr 2001, pp 80-93.
7. Donaldson, T., and Preston, L.E. "The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation - Concepts, Evidence, and Implications," Academy of Management Review (20:1), Jan 1995, pp 65-91.
8. Flak, L.S., and Rose, J. "Stakeholder Governance: Adapting Stakeholder Theory to the e-Government Field," Communications of the Association for Information Systems (Forthcoming).
9. Freeman, R.E. Strategic Management. A Stakeholder Approach, 1984, p. 276.
10. Grönlund, A. "What's In a Field - Exploring the eGovemment Domain," 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Hawaii, USA, 2005.
11. Heeks, R. "Explaining Success and Failure of e-Govemment," The European Conference of E-Government, Dublin, Ireland, 2001, pp. 163-174.
12. Hendry, J. "Missing the target: Normative stakeholder theory and the corporate governance debate," Business Ethics Quarterly (11:1), Jan 2001, pp 159-176.
13. Ho, A.T.K. "Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative," Public Administration Review (62:4), Jul-Aug 2002, pp 434-444.
14. Hoegler, T., and Schuster, T. "Quo vadis e-Government? - A trap between unsuitable technologies and deployment strategies," in: Electronic Government, Proceedings, 2002, pp. 403-406.
15. Hof, S. "Arguments for a holistic and open approach to secure e- Government," in: Electronic Government, Proceedings, 2002, pp. 464-467.
16. Hood, C. "A Public Management for All Seasons," Public Administration (69:1), Spr 1991, pp 3-19.
17. Jaeger, P.T. "Constitutional principles and E-govemment: an opinion about possible effects of Federalism and the separation of powers on E-govemment policies," Government Information Quarterly (19:4) 2002, pp 357-368.
18. Kaylor, C., Deshazo, R., and Van Eck, D. "Gauging e-government: A report on implementing services among American cities," Government Information Quarterly (18:4) 2001, pp 293-307.
19. Layne, K., and Lee, J.W. "Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model," Government Information Quarterly (18:2) 2001, pp 122-136.
20. Lenk, K. "Electronic service delivery - A driver of public sector modernisation," Information Polity (7:2,3) 2002, pp 87-96.
21. Mathiassen, L. and P. A. Nielsen (1989). "Soft Systems and Hard Contradictions - Approaching the Reality of Informations Systems in Organizations." Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 16.
22. Miles, M. B. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, Calif., Sage.
23. Missier, P., Lalk, G., Verykios, V., Grille, F., Lorusso, T., and Angeletti, P. "Improving data quality in practice: A case study in the Italian Public Administration," Distributed and Parallel Databases (13:2), Mar 2003, pp 135-160.
24. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., and Wood, D.J. "Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts," Academy of Management Review (22:4), Oct 1997, pp 853-886.
25. Potter, A. "Accessibility of Alabama government web sites," Journal of Government Information (29:5), Sep-Oct 2002, pp 303-317.
26. Pouloudi, A., and Whitley, E.A. "Stakeholder identification in inter-organizational systems: Gaining insights for drug use management systems," European Journal of Information Systems (6:1), Mar 1997, pp 1-14.
27. Reddick, C.G. "A Two-Stage Model of E-Government Growth: Theories and Empirical Evidence for U.S. Cities," Government Information Quarterly (21) 2004, pp 51-64.
28. Scholl, H. J. (2001, October 3-5). Applying stakeholder theory to e-govemment: Benefits and limits. Proceedings of the 1st IFIP Conference on E-Commerce, E-Business, and E-Government (I3E 2001), Zurich, Switzerland.
29. Scholl, H. J. (2004). Involving salient stakeholders: Beyond the technocratic view on change. Action Research, 2(3), 281-308.
30. Van de Ven, A. H. and M. S. Poole (1995). "Explaining development and change in organizations." Academy of Management Review 20(3): 510-540.
31. Vidgen, R. "Stakeholders, soft systems and technology: Separation and mediation in the analysis of information system requirements," Information Systems Journal (7:1), Jan 1997, pp 21-46.
32. Watson, R.T., and Mundy, B. "A strategic perspective of electronic democracy," Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM (44:1), January 2001, p 27.
33. Wimmer, M.A., and Holler, U. "Applying a holistic approach to develop user-friendly, customer-oriented e-Government portal interfaces," in: Universal Access: Theoretical Perspectives, Practice, and Experience, 2003, pp. 167-178.