Limits to the evolution of assortative mating by female choice under restricted gene flow

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 278, Issue 1703, 2011, Pages 179-187

  Servedio, Maria R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Mathematical model; Reinforcement; Sexual selection; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ASSORTATIVE MATING; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; GENE FLOW; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MATE CHOICE; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

EID: 78650454553     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1174     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Coyne, J. A. & Orr, H. A. 2004 Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
2. Mayr, E. 1942 Systematics and the origin of species. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
3. Wiley, E. O. 1978 The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Syst. Zool. 27, 17-26. (doi:10.2307/2412809)
4. Turelli, M., Barton, N. H. & Coyne, J. A. 2001 Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 330-343. (doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02177-2) (Pubitemid 32525773)
5. Moore, J. A. 1957 An embryologist's view of the species concept. In The species problem (ed. E. Mayr), pp. 325-338. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
6. Matessi, C., Gimelfarb, A. & Gavrilets, S. 2001 Longterm buildup of reproductive isolation promoted by disruptive selection: how far does it go? Selection 2, 41-64. (doi:10.1556/Select.2.2001.1-2.4)
7. Kirkpatrick, M. & Nuismer, S. L. 2004 Sexual selection can constrain sympatric speciation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 687-693. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 2003.2645) (Pubitemid 38437937)
8. Schneider, K. A. 2005 Competitive divergence in nonrandom mating populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 68, 105-118. (doi:10.1016/j.tpb.2005.05.001) (Pubitemid 41127973)
9. Schneider, K. A. & Bürger, R. 2006 Does competitive divergence occur if assortative mating is costly? J. Evol. Biol. 19, 570-598. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01001.x)
10. Bürger, R., Schneider, K. A. & Willendsdorfer, M. 2006 The conditions for speciation through intraspecific competition. Evolution 60, 2185-2206.
11. Otto, S. P., Servedio, M. R. & Nuismer, S. L. 2008 Frequency-dependent selection and the evolution of assortative mating. Genetics 179, 2091-2112. (doi:10.1534/genetics.107.084418)
12. Pennings, P. S., Kopp, M.,Meszena, G., Dieckmann, U. & Hermisson, J. 2008 An analytically tractable model for competitive speciation. Am. Nat. 171, E44-E71. (doi:10.1086/523952) (Pubitemid 351226022)
13. Kirkpatrick, M. 1982 Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36, 1-12. (doi:10.2307/2407961)
14. Servedio, M. R. 2000 Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating. Evolution 54, 21-29.
15. Servedio, M. R. 2004 The evolution of premating isolation: local adaptation and natural and sexual selection against hybrids. Evolution 58, 913-924.
16. Proulx, S. R. & Servedio, M. R. 2009 Dissecting selection of female mating preferences during secondary contact. Evolution 63, 2031-2046. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00710.x)
17. Maynard Smith, J. & Price, G. R. 1973 The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246, 15-18. (doi:10.1038/ 246015a0)
18. Eshel, I. 1983 Evolutionary and continuous stability. J. Theor. Biol 1, 99-111.
19. Gavrilets, S. 2004 Fitness landscapes and the origin of species. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Barton, N. H. & Turelli, M. 1991 Natural and sexual selection on many loci. Genetics 127, 229-255.
21. Gavrilets, S. 2003 Perspective: models of speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 57, 2197-2215.
22. de Cara, M. A. R., Barton, N. H. & Kirkpatrick, M. 2008 A model for the evolution of assortative mating. Am. Nat. 171, 580-596. (doi:10.1086/587062) (Pubitemid 351589842)
23. Lorch, P. D. & Servedio, M. R. 2007 The evolution of conspecific gamete precedence and its effect on reinforcement. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 937-949. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01306.x) (Pubitemid 46663117)
24. M'Gonigle, L. K. & FitzJohn, R. G. 2010 Assortative mating and spatial structure in hybrid zones. Evolution 64, 444-455. (doi:10.1111/j.1558- 5646.2009.00838.x)
25. Bürger, R. & Schneider, K. A. 2006 Intraspecific competitive divergence and convergence under assortative mating. Am. Nat. 167, 190-205. (doi:10.1086/499375) (Pubitemid 43271173)
26. Doebeli, M. 1996 A quantitative genetic competition model for sympatric speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 9, 893-909. (doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.1996.9060893.x)
27. Alatalo, R. V., Carlson, A. & Lundberg, A. 1988 The costs of mate choice in the pied flycatcher. Anim. Behav. 36, 289-291. (doi:10.1016/S0003- 3472(88)80272-0)
28. Hedrick, A. V. & Dill, L. M. 1993 Mate choice by female crickets is influenced by predation risk. Anim. Behav. 46, 193-196. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1993. 1176)
29. Real, L. 1990 Search Theory and mate choice. I. Models of single-sex discrimination. Am. Nat. 136, 376-404. (doi:10.1086/285103)
30. Hauber, M. E. & Sherman, P. W. 2001 Self-reference phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends Neuro. 24, 609-616. (doi:10.1016/S0166-2236(00)01916-0) (Pubitemid 32913392)
31. Verzijden, M. N., Lachlan, R. F. & Servedio, M. R. 2005 Female mate-choice behavior and sympatric speciation. Evolution 59, 2097-2108.
32. Tramm, N. A. & Servedio, M. R. 2008 Evolution of mate-choice imprinting: competing strategies. Evolution 62, 1991-2003. (doi:10.1111/j.1558- 5646.2008.00419.x) (Pubitemid 352033257)
33. Bolnick, D. I. 2006 Multi-species outcomes in a common model of sympatric speciation. J. Theor. Biol. 241, 734-744. (doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2006.01.009) (Pubitemid 44080786)
34. Kirkpatrick, M. & Servedio, M. R. 1999 The reinforcement of mating preferences on an island. Genetics 151, 865-884.
35. Peischl, S. & Schneider, K. A. 2010 Evolution of dominance under frequency-dependent intraspecific competition in an assortatively mating population. Evolution 64, 561-582. (doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00839.x)