Introduction to the special issue: Current research in Cattell-Horn-Carroll-based assessment

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 47, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 621-634

  Newton, Jocelyn H ^a   McGrew, Kevin S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LA CROSSE   (United States)

^b Woodcock Muñoz Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650440913     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: 15206807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20495     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ackerman, P., Beier, M., & Boyle, M. (2002). Individual differences in working memory within a nomological network of cognitive and perceptual speed abilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(4), 567-589.
2. Ackerman, P., & Cianciolo, A. (2000). Cognitive, perceptual-speed, and psychomotor determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(4), 259-290.
3. Ackerman, P., & Kanfer, R. (1993). Integrating laboratory and field study for improving selection: Development of a battery for predicting air traffic controller success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(3), 413-432.
4. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Deary, I. (2003). Reaction time and psychometric intelligence: Jensen's contributions. In H. Nyborg (Ed.), The scientific study of general intelligence: Tribute to Arthur R. Hensen (pp. 53-76). San Diego: Pergamon.
6. Dehn, M. J. (2008). Working memory and academic learning: Assessment and intervention. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
7. Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
8. Dombrowski, S. C., Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2004). After the demise of the discrepancy: Proposed learning disabilities diagnostic criteria. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 364-372.
9. Ekstrom, R. M., French, J. W., & Harman, H. H. (1979). Cognitive factors: Their identification and replication. Multivariate Behavioral Research Monographs, 79(2), 3-84.
10. Elliott, C. (2007). Differential Ability Scales--Second Edition (DAS-II). San Antonio: Harcourt Assessment.
11. Elliott, C. D., Hale, J. B., Fiorello, C. A., Dorvil, C., & Moldovan, J. (2010). Differential Ability Scales-II prediction of reading performance: Global scores are not enough. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 698-720.
12. Fiorello, C. A., Hale, J. B., & Snyder, L. E. (2006). Cognitive hypothesis testing and response to intervention for children with reading problems. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 835-853.
13. Flanagan, D. P., Fiorello, C. A., & Ortiz, S. O. (2010). Enhancing practice through application of Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory and research: A "third method" approach to specific learning disability identification. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 739-760.
14. Flanagan, D. P., Genshaft, J. L., & Harrison, P. L. (1997). Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. New York: Guilford.
15. Flanagan, D. P., & Harrison, P. L. (Eds.). (2005). Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
16. Flanagan, D. P., & McGrew, K. S. (1997). A cross-battery approach to assessing and interpreting cognitive abilities: Narrowing the gap between practice and science. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 314-325). New York: Guilford.
17. Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S., & Alfonso, V. C. (2007). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
18. Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., Alfonso, V. C., & Mascolo, J. (2006). The achievement test desk reference (ATDR), second edition: A guide to learning disability identification. New York: Wiley.
19. Fletcher, J. M., Coulter, W. A., Reschly, D. J., & Vaughn, S. (2004). Alternative approaches to the definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some questions and answers. Annals of Dyslexia, 54, 304-331.
20. Fletcher, J. M., & Reschly, D. J. (2005). Changing procedures for identifying learning disabilities: The danger of perpetuating old ideas. The School Psychologist, 59, 10-15.
21. Floyd, R. G., Bergeron, R., Hamilton, G., & Parra, G. R. (2010). How do executive functions fit with the Cattell-Horn-Carroll model? Some evidence from a joint factor analysis of the Delis-Kaplan executive function system and the Woodcock-Johnson III tests of cognitive abilities. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 721-738.
22. Glover, T. A., & DiPerna, J. C. (2007). Service delivery for response to intervention: Core components and directions for future research. School Psychology Review, 36, 526-540.
23. Gresham, F. M., Restori, A. F., & Cook, C. R. (2008). To test or not to test: Issues pertaining to response to intervention and cognitive testing. Communiqué, 37, 5-7.
24. Hale, J. B., Kaufman, A., Naglieri, J. A., & Kavale, K. A. (2006). Implementation of IDEA: Integrating response to intervention and cognitive assessment methods. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 753-770.
25. Hale, J. B., Naglieri, J. A., Kaufman, A., & Kavale, K. A. (2004). Specific learning disability classification in the new individuals with disabilities education act: The danger of good ideas. The School Psychologist, 6, 29-30.
26. Hollingsworth, L. (1926). Gifted children, their nature and nurture. New York: Macmillan.
27. Horn, J. L. (1989). Measurement of intellectual capabilities: A review of theory. In K. S. McGrew, J. K. Werder, & R. W. Woodcock (Eds.), WJ-R technical manual (pp. 197-245). Chicago, IL: Riverside.
28. Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC R. New York: Wiley & Sons.
29. Kaufman, A. S. (2009). IQ testing 101. New York: Springer Publishing.
30. Kavale, K. A., & Flanagan, D. P. (2007). Ability-achievement discrepancy, response to intervention, and assessment of cognitive abilities/processes in specific learning disability identification: Toward a contemporary operational definition. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 130-147). New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
31. Keith, T. Z., Low, J. A., Reynolds, M. R., Patel, P. G., & Ridley, K. P. (2010). Higher-order factor structure of the Differential Ability Scales-II: Consistency across ages 4 to 17. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 676-697.
32. Keith, T. Z., & Reynolds, M. R. (2010). Cattell-Horn-Carroll abilities and cognitive tests: What we've learned from 20 years of research. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 635-650.
33. Lubinski, D. (2000). Scientific and social significance of assessing individual differences: "Sinking shafts at a few critical points." Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 405-444.
34. Mather, N., & Gregg, N. (2006). Specific learning disabilities: Clarifying, not eliminating, a construct. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 99-106.
35. Mather, N., & Wendling, B. J. (2005). Linking cognitive assessment results to academic interventions for students with learning disabilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 269-294). New York: Guilford Press.
36. McGrew, K. S. (1994). Clinical interpretation of the Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability Revised. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
37. McGrew, K. S. (1997). Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to a proposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 151-179). New York: Guilford.
38. McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed., pp. 136-181). New York: Guilford Press.
39. McGrew, K. S. (2009). Editorial: CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37, 1-10.
40. McGrew, K. S., & Flanagan, D. P. (1998). The intelligence test desk reference (ITDR): Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
41. McGrew, K. S., Flanagan, D. P., Keith, T. Z., & Vanderwood, M. (1997). Beyond g: The impact of Gf-Gc specific cognitive abilities research on the future use and interpretation of intelligence tests in the school. School Psychology Review, 26(2), 189-210.
42. McGrew K. S., & Wendling, B. J. (2010). Cattell-Horn-Carroll cognitive-achievement relations: What we have learned from the past 20 years of research. Psychology in the Schools, 47(7), 651-675.
43. McGrew, K. S., Werder, J. K., & Woodcock, R. W. (1991). The WJ-R technical manual. Chicago: Riverside.
44. Naglieri, J. A., & Kaufman, A. S. (2008). IDEIA and specific learning disabilities: What role does intelligence play? In E. L. Grigorenko (Ed.), Educating individuals with disabilities: IDEIA 2004 and beyond (pp. 165-195). New York: Springer Publishing.
45. Nettelbeck, T. (2003). Inspection time and g. In H. Nyborg (Ed.), The scientific study of general intelligence: Tribute to Arthur R. Jensen (pp. 77-92). San Diego: Pergamon.
46. Reschly, D. J. (1997). Utility of individual ability measures and public policy choices for the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 26, 234-241.
47. Reschly, D. J. (2005). Learning disabilities and identification: Primary intervention, secondary intervention, and then what? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 510-515.
48. Roberts, R. D., & Stankov, L. (1999). Individual differences in speed of mental processing and human cognitive abilities: Toward a taxonomic model. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(1), 1-120.
49. Royce, J. R. (1973). Multivariate analysis and psychological theory. New York: Academic Press.
50. Shinn, M. R. (2007). Identifying students at risk, monitoring performance, and determining eligibility within response to intervention: Research on educational need and benefit from academic intervention. School Psychology Review, 36, 601-617.
51. Stankov, L. (2000). Structural extensions of a hierarchical view on human cognitive abilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 12(1), 35-51.
52. Stankov, L., & Horn, J. (1980). Human abilities revealed through auditory tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(1), 21-44.
53. Terman, L. (1925). Genetic studies of genius. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
54. Witsken, D., Stoeckel, A., & D'Amato, R. C. (2008). Leading educational change using a neuropsychological response-to-intervention approach: Linking our past, present, and future. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 791-798.
55. Woodcock, R. W. (1990). Theoretical foundations of the WJ-R measures of cognitive ability. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 231-258.
56. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
57. Ysseldyke, J. E. (1990). Goodness of fit of the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised to the Horn-Cattell GF-GC theory. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 8, 268-275.