Application of virtual reality in the motor aspects of neurorehabilitation;Aplicación de la realidad virtual en los aspectos motores de la neurorrehabilitación

Revista de Neurologia

Volumn 51, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 481-488

  Peñasco Martín, Benito ^a   De Los Reyes Guzmán, Ana ^a   Gil Agudo, Ángel ^a   Bernal Sahún, Alberto ^b   Pérez Aguilar, Beatriz ^b   De La Peña González, Ana Isabel ^a  

^a HOSPITAL NACIONAL DE PARAPLÉJICOS   (Spain)

^b SA ^*  (Spain)

Author keywords

Balance; Parkinson; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord injury; Stroke; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

BALANCE DISORDER; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NEUROREHABILITATION; PARKINSON DISEASE; REHABILITATION; REVIEW; SPINAL CORD INJURY; STROKE; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 78649816947     PISSN: 02100010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.33588/rn.5108.2009665     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Cano de la Cuerda R, Muñoz-Hellín E, Alguacil-Diego IM, Molina-Rueda F. Telerrehabilitación y neurología. Rev Neurol 2010; 51: 49-56.
2. Weiss PL, Kizony R, Feintuch U, Katz N. Virtual reality in neurorehabilitation. In Selzer M, Clarke S, Cohen L, Duncan P, Gage F, eds. Textbook of neural repair and rehabilitation. Cambridge: University Press; 2006. p. 182-97.
3. Holden MK. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav 2005; 8: 187-211.
4. Rizzo A, Kim GJ. A SWOT analysis of the field of virtual reality rehabilitation and therapy. Presence 2005; 14: 119-46.
5. Viau A, Feldman AG, McFadyen BJ, Levin MF. Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004; 1: 11.
6. Subramanian S, Knaut LA, Beaudoin C, McFayden BJ, Feldman AG, Levin MF. Virtual reality environments for post-stroke arm rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007; 4: 20.
7. Knaut LA, Subramanian SK, McFadyen BJ, Bourbonnais D, Levin MF. Kinematics of pointing movements made in a virtual versus a physical 3-dimensional environment in healthy and stroke subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 793-802.
8. You SH, Jang SH, Kim Y, Hallett M, Ahn SH, Kwon Y, et al. Virtual reality-induced cortical reorganization and associated locomotor recovery in chronic stroke. An experimental-blind randomized study. Stroke 2005; 36: 1166-71.
9. Rose FD, Attree EA, Brooks BM. Virtual environments in neuropsychological assessment and rehabilitation. In Riva G, ed. Virtual reality in neuro-psycho-physiology. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1997. p. 147-55.
10. Sveistrup H. Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004; 1: 10.
11. Fidopiastis CM, Stapleton CB, Whiteside JD, Hughes CE, Fiore SM, Martin GA, et al. Human experience modeler: context driven cognitive retraining to facilitate transfer of learning. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006; 9: 183-7.
12. Bouzit M, Burdea G, Popescu G, Boian R. The Rutgers Master II-new design force-feedback glove. IEEE Trans Mechatron 2002; 7: 256-63.
13. Merians AS, Poizner H, Boian R, Burdea G, Adamovich S. Sensorimotor training in a virtual reality environment: does it improve functional recovery poststroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006; 20: 1-16.
14. Merians AS, Jack D, Boian R, Tremaine M, Burdea GC, Adamovich SV, et al. Virtual reality-augmented rehabilitation for patients following stroke. Phys Ther 2002; 82: 898-915. (Pubitemid 34983274)
15. Adamovich SV, Merians AS, Boian R, Tremaine M, Burdea G, Recce M, et al. A virtual reality based exercise system for hand rehabilitation post-stroke. International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation. Piscataway, EEUU, septiembre de 2003.
16. Jebsen RH, Taylor N, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA. An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1969; 50: 311-9.
17. Kuttuva M, Boian R, Merians A, Burdea G, Bouzit M, Lewis J, et al. The Rutgers Arm: an upper-extremity rehabilitation system in virtual reality. Fourth International. Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation. Santa Catalina, EE. UU., septiembre de 2005.
18. Polhemus Co. URL: http://www.polhemus.com. [04.09.2009].
19. Kuttuva M, Boian R, Merians A, Burdea G, Bouzit M, Lewis J, et al. The Rutgers Arm, a rehabilitation system in virtual reality: a pilot study. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006; 9: 148-52.
20. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 13-31.
21. Boian R, Lee CS, Deutsch JE, Burdea G, Lewis J. Virtual reality-based system for ankle rehabilitation post stroke. 1st International Workshop on Virtual Reality Rehabilitation. Lausana, Suiza, 2002.
22. Boian R, Kourtev H, Erickson K, Deutsch JE, Lewis J, Burdea G. Dual Stewart-platform gait rehabilitation system for individuals post-stroke. International Workshop on Virtual Rehabilitation. Piscataway, EE. UU., septiembre de 2003.
23. Holden M, Todorov E, Callahan J, Bizzi E. Virtual environment training improves motor performance in two patients with stroke: case report. Neurol Rep 1999; 23: 57-67.
24. Holden M, Dyar T, Callahan T, Schwamm L, Bizzi E. Quantitative assessment of motor generalization in the real world following training in virtual environments in patients with stroke. Neurol Rep 2001; 25: 129-30.
25. Holden M, Dyar T. Virtual environment training: a new tool for neurorehabilitation. Neurol Rep 2002; 26: 62-71.
26. Wolf SL, Catlin PA, Ellis M, Archer AL, Morgan B, Piacentino A. Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32: 1635-9.
27. Hilton D, Cobb S, Pridmore T, Gladman J. Virtual reality and stroke rehabilitation: a tangible interface to an every day task. Fourth International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality & Assoc. Tech. Veszprém, Hungría, 2002.
28. Pridmore T, Hilton D, Green J, Eastgate R, Cobb S. Mixed reality environments in stroke rehabilitation: interfaces across the real/virtual divide. Fifth International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality & Assoc. Tech. Oxford, Reino Unido, 2004.
29. Luo X, Kenyon RV, Kline T, Waldinger HC, Kamper DG. An augmented reality training environment for post-stroke finger extension rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. Chicago, EE. UU., 2005.
30. Luo X, Kline T, Fischer HC, Stubblefield KA, Kenyon RV, Kamper DG. Integration of augmented reality and assistive devices for post-stroke hand opening rehabilitation. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference. Shanghái, China, 2005.
31. Luo X, Kenyon RV, Kamper DG. VR Post-stroke hand opening rehabilitation: an approach utilizing virtual reality, body orthosis and pneumatic device. International Conference on Aging Disability and Independence. St Petersburg, EE. UU., 2006.
32. Jacobson-Sollerman C, Sperling L. Grip function of the healthy hand in a standardized hand function test. A study of the Rancho Los Amigos test. Scand J Rehabil Med 1977; 9: 123-9.
33. Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hervert R, Dutil E, Mercier L. Validation of the Box & Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity and norms studied. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 751-5.
34. SensAble technologies. URL: http://www.sensable.com/products-haptic- devices.htm. [15.09.2009].
35. Stewart JC, Yeh SC, Jung Y, Yoon H, Whitford M, Chen SY, et al. Intervention to enhance skilled arm and hand movements after stroke: a feasibility study using a new virtual reality system. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007; 4: 21.
36. Eng K, Siekierka E, Pyk P, Chevrier E, Hauser Y, Cameirao M, et al. Interactive visuo-motor therapy system for stroke rehabilitation. Med Biol Eng Comput 2007; 45: 901-7.
37. Crosbie JH, McDonough, Lennon S, Pokluda L, McNeill DJ. Virtual reality in the upper limb after stroke. The user's perspective. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality & Assoc. Tech. Oxford, Reino Unido, 2004.
38. Yavuzer G, Senel A, Atay MB Stam HJ. 'Playstation eyetoy games' improve upper extremity-related motor functioning in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2008; 44: 237-44.
39. Deutsch JE, Robbins D, Morrison J, Bowlby PG. Wii-based compared to standard of care balance and mobility rehabilitation for two individuals pot-stroke. Virtual Rehabilitation 2009 International Conference. Haifa, Israel, 2009.
40. GestureTek. URL: http://www.gesturetek.com. [05.10.2009].
41. Kizony R, Raz L, Katz N, Weingarden H, Weiss PL. Videocapture virtual reality system for patients with paraplegic spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42: 595-608.
42. Duncan PW, Weiner DK, Chandler J, Studenski S. Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. J Gerontol 1990; 45: 192-97.
43. Lynch SM, Leahy P, Barker SP. Reliability of measurements obtained with a modified functional reach test in subjects with spinal cord injury. Phys Ther 1998; 78: 128-33. (Pubitemid 28106232)
44. Riva G. Virtual reality in paraplegia: a VR-enhanced orthopaedic appliance for walking and rehabilitation. In Riva G, Wiederhold BK, Molinari E, eds. Virtual environments in clinical psychology and neuroscience. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1998. p. 209-18.
45. Riva G. Virtual reality in paraplegia: a test bed application. International Journal of Virtual Reality 2001; 5: 1.
46. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983; 33: 1444-52.
47. Leocani L, Comi E, Annovazzi P, Rovaris M, Rossi P, Cursi M, et al. Impaired short-term motor learning in multiple sclerosis: evidence from virtual reality. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007; 21: 273-8.
48. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, Gayton D. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Can 1989; 41: 304-11.
49. Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1995; 50: 28-34.
50. Fulk GD. Locomotor training and virtual reality-based balance training for an individual with multiple sclerosis: a case report. J Neurol Phys Ther 2005; 29: 34-42.
51. Weghorst S, Prothero J, Furness T, Anson D, Riess T. Virtual images in the treatment of Parkinson's disease akinesia. Medicine meets virtual reality II. San Diego, EE. UU., enero de 1994.
52. Riess T. Augmented reality in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. In Morgan K, Satava M, Sieburg HB, Mattheus R, Christensen JP, eds. Interactive technology and the new paradigm of healthcare. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1995. p. 298-302.
53. Baram Y, Aharon-Peretz J, Simionovici Y, Ron L. Walking on virtual tiles. Neural Proc Lett 2002; 16: 227-33.
54. Whitney SL, Sparto PJ, Brown KE, Furman JM, Jacobson JL, Redfern MS. The potential use of virtual reality in vestibular rehabilitation: preliminary findings with the BNAVE. Neurol Rep 2002; 26: 72-8.
55. Cikajlo I, Rudolf M, Goljar N, Matjacic Z. Virtual reality task for telerehabilitation dynamic balance training in stroke subjects. Virtual Rehabilitation 2009 International Conference. Haifa, Israel, 2009.
56. Rossier P, Wade DT. Validity and reliability comparison of 4 mobility measures in patients presenting neurologic impairment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001; 82: 9-13.
57. Holden M, Dettwiler A, Dyar T, Niemann G, Bizzi E. Retraining movement in patients with acquired brain injury using a virtual environment. In Westwood JD, Hoffman HM, Mogel GT, Stredney D, eds. Medicine meets virtual reality. Newport Beach: IOS Press; 2001. p. 192-8.
58. Wolf Sl, LeCraw DE, Barton LA. Comparison of motor copy and targeted biofeedback training techniques for restitution of upper extremity function among patients with neurologic disorders. Phys Ther 1998; 69: 719-35.
59. Davies RC, Löfgren E, Wallergard M, Linden A, Boschian K, Minör U, et al. Three applications of virtual reality for brain injury rehabilitation of daily tasks. Fourth International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality & Assoc Tech. Veszprém, Hungría, 2002.