Interactive visuo-motor therapy system for stroke rehabilitation

Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing

Volumn 45, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 901-907

  Eng, Kynan ^a   Siekierka, Ewa ^b   Pyk, Pawel ^a   Chevrier, Edith ^a   Hauser, Yves ^a   Cameirao, Monica ^c   Holper, Lisa ^a   Hägni, Karin ^d   Zimmerli, Lukas ^c   Duff, Armin ^c   Schuster, Corina ^e   Bassetti, Claudio ^b   Verschure, Paul ^c   Kiper, Daniel ^a  

^a Institute of Neuroinformatics Zurich   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^d ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^e Reha Rheinfelden   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Rehabilitation; Stroke; Therapy; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

OPTIMIZATION; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT REHABILITATION; PHYSICAL THERAPY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

MOTOR NEUROREHABILITATION SYSTEM; VISUO-MOTOR THERAPY SYSTEM;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; LEARNING; MOTIVATION; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NERVE STIMULATION; PARESIS; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PHYSIOTHERAPY; REHABILITATION CARE; SCHOOL CHILD; STROKE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; HUMANS; MOTOR SKILLS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PILOT PROJECTS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VIDEO GAMES; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34548685020     PISSN: 01400118     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-007-0239-1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Altschuler EL, Wisdom SB, Stone L, Foster C, Galasko D, Llewellyn DME, Ramachandran VS (1999) Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet 353:2035-2036
2. Barreca SR, Stratford PW, Lambert CL, Masters LM, Streiner DL (2005) Test-retest reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Chedoke arm and hand activity inventory: A new measure of upper-limb function for survivors of stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:1616-1622
3. Binkofski F, Amunts K, Stephan KM, Posse S, Schormann T, Freund HJ, Zilles K, Seitz RJ (2000) Broca's region subserves imagery of motion: A combined cytoarchitectonic and fMRI study. Human Brain Mapp 11(4):273-285
4. Braun SM, Beurskens AJ, Borm PJ, Schack T, Wade DT (2006) The effects of mental practice in stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87(6):842-852
5. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Seitz RJ, Zilles K, Rizzolatti G, Freund HJ (2001) Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 13:400-404
6. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Riggio L (2004) The mirror neuron system and action recognition. Brain Lang 89:370-376
7. Deutsch JE, Latonio J, Burdea GC, Boian R (2001) Post-stroke rehabilitation with the Rutgers ankle system: A case study. Presence 10:416-430
8. Dohle C, Kleiser R, Seitz RJ, Freund HJ (2004) Body scheme gates visual processing. J Neurophysiol 91:2376-2379
9. Fadiga L, Craighero L (2004) Electrophysiology of action representation. J Clin Neurophysiol 21(3):157-169
10. Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Pavesi G, Rizzolatti G (1995) Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. J Neurophysiol 73(6):2608-2611
11. Fadiga L, Buccino G, Craighero L, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Pavesi G (1999) Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by motor imagery: A magnetic stimulation study. Neuropsychologia 37:147-158
12. Gaggioli A, Meneghini A, Morganti F, Alcaniz M, Riva G (2006) A strategy for computer-assisted mental practice in stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 20(4):503-507
13. Hesse S, Schmidt H, Werner C, Bardeleben A (2003) Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control. Curr Opin Neurol 16(6):705-710
14. Holden M (2005) Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation. CyberPsychology & Behavior 8(3)
15. Holden MK, Dyer TA, Schwamm L, Bizzi E (2005) Virtual-environment-based telerehabilitation in patients with stroke. Presence 14(2):214-233
16. Huang H, Ingalls T, Olson L, Ganley K, Rikakis T, He J (2005) Interactive multimodal biofeedback for task-oriented neural rehabilitation. IEEE-EMBC 2005, Shanghai, China
17. Hummelsheim H, Maier-Loth ML, Eickhof C (1997) The functional value of electrical muscle stimulation for the rehabilitation of the hand in stroke patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 29(1):3-10
18. Jezernik S, Colombo G, Keller T, Frueh H, Morari M (2003) Robotic orthosis lokomat: A rehabilitation and research tool. Neuromodulation 6(2):108-115
19. Johnson-Frey SH, Maloof FR, Newman-Norhund R, Farrer C, Inati S, Grafton ST (2003) Actions or hand-object interactions? human inferior frontal cortex and action observation. Neuron 39:1053-1058
20. Keller T, Popovic MR, Pappas IP, Muller PY (2002) Transcutaneous functional electrical stimulator "Compex Motion". Artif Organs 26(3):219-223
21. Krebs HI, Ferraro M, Buerger SP, Newbery MJ, Makiyama A, Sandmann M, Lynch D, Volpe BT, Hogan N (2004) Rehabilitation robotics: Pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus 1(1):5
22. Kunkel A, Kopp B, Miiller G, Villringer K, Villringer A, Taub E, Flor H (1999) Constraint-induced movement therapy for motor recovery in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80:624-628
23. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E (2004) Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: Facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 22:281-299
24. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS (1994) Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: The copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75:394-398
25. Parsons LM, Gabrieli JDE, Phelps EA, Gazzaniga MS (1998) Cerebrally lateralized mental representations of hand shape and movement. J Neurosci 18(16):6539-6548
26. Popovic MR, Keller T (2004) Compex motion: Neuroprosthesis for grasping applications. Enabling technologies: Body image and body function. M MacLachlan, P Gallagher, Elsevier Science Ltd., New York, pp 197-216
27. Ramachandran VS, Hirstein W (1998) The perception of phantom limbs. Brain 121:1603-1630
28. Rizzolatti G, Camarda R, Fogassi L, Gentilucci M, Luppino G, Matelli M (1988) Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements. Exp Brain Res 71(3):491-507
29. Sharma N, Pomeroy VM, Baron JC (2006) Motor imagery. a backdoor to the motor system after stroke? Stroke 37:1941-1952
30. Stefan K, Cohen LG, Duque J, Mazzocchio R, Celnik P, Sawaki L, Ungerleider L, Classen J (2005) Formation of a motor memory by action observation. J Neurosci 25(4125):9339-9346
31. Stevens JA, Stoykov ME (2003) Using motor imagery in the rehabilitation of hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84(7):1090-1092
32. Taub E, Crago JE, Uswatte G (1998) Constant-induced movement therapy: A new approach to treatment in physical rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol 43:152-170
33. van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Knol DL, de Vet HC, Bouter LM (2004) Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 35(6):1410-1414
34. Volpe BT, Ferraro M, Krebs HI, Hogan N (2002) Robotics in the rehabilitation treatment of patients with stroke. Curr Atheroscler Rep 4(4):270-276