Human experience modeler: Context-driven cognitive retraining to facilitate transfer of learning

Cyberpsychology and Behavior

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 183-187

  Fidopiastis, Cali M ^a   Stapleton, C B ^a   Whiteside, J D ^a   Hughes, C E ^a,b   Fiore, S M ^a   Martin, G A ^a   Rolland, J P ^a   Smith, E M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b University of Central Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN ARTERY ANEURYSM; CAMERA; CASE REPORT; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COGNITIVE REHABILITATION; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EXPERIENCE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIENCE MODELER; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY DISORDER; PILOT STUDY; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIDEORECORDING; VIRTUAL REALITY; WORKING MEMORY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; BRAIN DAMAGE, CHRONIC; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENT; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MALE; MEMORY DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 33646737077     PISSN: 10949313     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cpb.2006.9.183     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Rizzo, A.A., Shultheis, M., Kerns, K.A., et al. (2004). Analysis of assets for virtual reality applications in neuropsychology. Neuropsychology Rehabilitation 14:207-239.
2. Rose, F.D., Atree, E.A., Brooks, B.M., et al. (1998). Transfer of training from virtual to real environments. Presented at the 2nd European Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies, Skovde, Sweden.
3. Roediger, H.L., Gallo, D.A., & Geraci, L. (2002). Processing approaches to cognition: The impetus from the levels-of-processing framework. Memory 10:319-332.
4. Gourlay, D., Lun, K.C., Lee, Y.N., et al. (2000). Virtual reality for relearning daily living skills. International Journal of Medical Informatics 60:255-261.
5. Moreira da Costa, R.M., & Vidal de Carvalho, L.A. (2000). Virtual reality in cognitive retraining. Presented at IWALT 2000, the International Workshop on Advanced Learning Technology, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
6. Zhang, L., Abreu, B., Seale, G., et al. (2003). A virtual reality environment for evaluation of a daily living skill in brain injury rehabilitation: reliability and validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 84:1118-1124.
7. Feiner, S.K, (2002). Augmented reality: a new way of seeing. Scientific American April:50-54.
8. Hughes, C.E., Stapleton, C.B., Hughes, D.E., et al. (2005). Mixed reality in education, entertainment and training: an interdisciplinary approach. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26:24-30.
9. Uchiyama, S., Takemoto, K., Satoh, K., et al. (2002). MR platform, a basic body on which mixed reality applications are built. Presented at ISMAR '02, Darmstadt, Germany.
10. Ylvisaker, M. (1998). Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: children and adolescents, 2nd ed. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
11. Kennedy, R.S., Fowlkes, J.E., Berbaum, K.S., et al. (1992). Use of a motion sickness questionnaire for prediction of simulator sickness. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 63:588-593.