Molecular systematics and morphological character evolution of the Condamineeae (Rubiaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 97, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1961-1981

  Kainulainen, Kent ^a,b   Persson, Claes ^c   Eriksson, Torsten ^d   Bremer, Birgitta ^a,b  

^a ROYAL SWEDISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^d SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Character evolution; Condamineeae; Dialypetalanthus; Hippotideae; Ixoroideae; Rubiaceae; Seed morphology; Systematics

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CLADISTICS; DICOTYLEDON; DIVERGENCE; FRUIT; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

BATHYSA; BOTHRIOSPORA; CALYCOPHYLLEAE; CINCHONEAE; CONDAMINEEAE; DIALYPETALANTHUS; HIPPOTIDEAE; IXOROIDEAE; PHITOPIS; RONDELETIEAE; RUBIACEAE; RUSTIA; SCHIZOCALYX; SEMAPHYLLANTHE; WITTMACKANTHUS;

EID: 78649796330     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1000090     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. AIELLO, A. 1979. A reexamination of Portlandia (Rubiaceae) and associ- ated taxa. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 60: 38-123.
2. AKAIKE, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19: 716-723.
3. ALEJANDRO, G. D., S. G. RAZAFIMANDIMBISON, AND S. LIEDE-SCHUMANN 2005. Polyphyly of Mussaenda inferred from ITS and trnT-F data and its implication for generic limits in Mussaendeae (Rubiaceae). American Journal of Botany 92: 544-557.
4. ANDERSSON, L. 1994. Tribes Calycophylleae, Cinchoneae, and Hillieae (Rubiaceae). In G. Harling and L. Andersson [eds.], Flora of Ecuador, vol. 50, 1-112. Botanical Institute, G ö teborg University, G ö teborg, Sweden.
5. ANDERSSON, L. 1995. Tribes and genera of the Cinchoneae com- plex (Rubiaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 8 2: 409-427.
6. ANDERSSON, L., AND A. ANTONELLI. 2005. Phylogeny of the tribe Cinchoneae (Rubiaceae), its position in Cinchonoideae, and descrip- tion of a new genus, Ciliosemina. Taxon 54: 17-28.
7. ANDERSSON, L., AND C. PERSSON. 1991. Circumscription of the tribe Cinchoneae (Rubiaceae) - A cladistic approach. Plant Systematics and Evolution 178: 65-94.
8. ANDERSSON, L., AND J. H. E. ROVA. 1999. The rps16 intron and the phylogeny of the Rubioideae (Rubiaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 214: 161-186.
9. ANDERSSON, L., AND J. H. E. ROVA. 2004. Rubiaceae-Hippotideae. In G. Harling and &/x&&name&&fname&L.&/fname&&x& &/x&&sname&Andersson&/sname&&/name& [eds.];, Flora of Ecuador, vol. 74, 1-46. Botanical Institute, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
10. ANDREASEN, K., B. G. BALDWIN, AND B. BREMER. 1999. Phylogenetic utility of the nuclear rDNA ITS region in subfamily Ixoroideae (Rubiaceae): Comparisons with cpDNA rbc L sequence data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 217: 119-135.
11. BACKLUND, M., B. OXELMAN, AND B. BREMER. 2000. Phylogenetic rela- tionships within the Gentianales based on ndhF and rbcL sequences, with particular reference to the Loganiaceae. American Journal of Botany 87: 1029-1043.
12. BAWA, K. S. 1975. Dioecism in tropical forest trees. Evolution 29: 167-179.
13. BREMEKAMP, C. E. B. 1966. Remarks on the position, the delimitation and the subdivision of the Rubiaceae. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 15: 1-33.
14. BREMER, B. 1987. The sister group of the Paleotropical tribe Argostemmateae: A redefined Neotropical tribe Hamelieae (Rubiaceae, Rubioideae). Cladistics 3: 35-51.
15. BREMER, B. 2009. A review of molecular phylogenetic studies of Rubiaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 96: 4-26.
16. BREMER, B., K. BREMER, N. HEIDARI, P. ERIXON, R. G. OLMSTEAD, A. ANDERBERG, M. KÄLLERSJÖ, AND E. BARKHORDARIAN. 2002. Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chlo- roplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2 4: 274-301.
17. BREMER, B., AND T. ERIKSSON. 2009. Time tree of Rubiaceae: Phylogeny and dating the family, subfamilies, and tribes. International Journal of Plant Sciences 170: 766-793.
18. BREMER, B., R. K. JANSEN, B. OXELMAN, M. BACKLUND, H. LANTZ, AND K. J. KIM. 1999. More characters or more taxa for a robust phy- logeny - Case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae). Systematic Biology 48: 413-435.
19. BURGER, W., AND C. M. TAYLOR. 1993. Flora costaricensis. Rubiaceae. Fieldiana, Botany New Series 33: 1-333.
20. BURKILL, I. H. 1900. Dolicholobium acuminatum. Hooker's Icones Plantarum 27, pl. 2630.
21. CLASSEN-BOCKHOFF, R. 1996. A survey of flower-like inflorescences in the Rubiaceae. Opera Botanica Belgica 7: 329-367.
22. CORNEJO, X. 2006. Two new species of Pentagonia (Rubiaceae- Hippotideae) from Ecuador and Peru. Harvard Papers in Botany 11: 19-24.
23. CRONQUIST, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia Press, New York New York, USA.
24. DARWIN, S. P. 1977. Genus Mastixiodendron (Rubiaceae). Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 58: 349-381.
25. DELPRETE, P. G. 1996a. Evaluation of the tribes Chiococceae, Condamineeae and Catesbaeeae (Rubiaceae) based on morphological characters. Opera Botanica Belgica 7: 165-192.
26. DELPRETE, P. G. 1996b. Notes on calycophyllous Rubiaceae. Part I. Morphological comparisons of the genera Chimarrhis, Bathysa, and Calycophyllum, with new combinations and a new species, Chimarrhis gentryana. Brittonia 48: 35-44.
27. DELPRETE, P. G. 1996c. Systematics, typification, distribution, and reproductive biology of Pinckneya bracteata (Rubiaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 201: 243-261.
28. DELPRETE, P. G. 1997. Notes on calycophyllous Rubiaceae. Part II. Morphological comparison of the genera Bathysa and Schizocalyx. Brittonia 49: 480-486.
29. DELPRETE, P. G. 1999. Rondeletieae (Rubiaceae), part 1, Flora neotropica. Monograph 77. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA.
30. DELPRETE, P. G., AND R. CORTÉS-B. 2004. A phylogenetic study of the tribe Sipaneeae (Rubiaceae, Ixoroideae), using trnL-F and ITS se-quence data. Taxon 53: 347-356.
31. DWYER, J. D. 1980. Part IX. Family 179. Rubiaceae-Part 1; R. E. Woodson Jr. and R. W. Schery [eds.], Flora of Panama. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 67: 1-256.
32. ENDRESS, M. E., B. SENNBLAD, S. NILSSON, L. CIVEYREL, M. W. CHASE, S. HUYSMANS, E. GRAFSTROEM, AND B. BREMER. 1996. A phy- logenetic analysis of Apocynaceae s. str. and some related taxa in Gentianales. A multidiciplinary approach. Opera Botanica Belgica 7: 59-102.
33. FAY, M. F., B. BREMER, G. T. PRANCE, M. VAN DER BANK, D. BRIDSON, AND M. W. CHASE. 2000. Plastid rbcL sequence data show Dialypetalanthus to be a member of Rubiaceae. Kew Bulletin 55: 853-864.
34. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 38: 783-791.
35. GARCÍA KIRKBRIDE, M. C. 1981. Duas novas tribos de Rubiaceae neotro- picais. Revista Brasileira de Bot â nica 4: 119-123.
36. GENTRY, A. H. 1993. A field guide to the families and genera of woody plants of northwest South America (Colombia, Ecuador, Peru) with supplementary notes on herbaceous taxa. Conservation International, Washington, D.C., USA.
37. GERMANO-FILHO, P. 1999. Estudos taxonômicos do gênero Bathysa C. Presl (Rubiaceae, Rondeletieae), no Brasil. Rodriguésia 5 0: 49-75.
38. GOVAERTS, R., L. ANDERSSON, E. ROBBRECHT, D. BRIDSON, A. P. DAVIS, I. SCHANZER, AND B. SONKÉ. 2010. World checklist of Rubiaceae. Board of Trustees of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. UK. Website http://www.kew.org/wcsp/ [accessed 18 February 2010].
39. GUINDON, S., AND T. GASCUEL. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52: 696-704.
40. HALL, T. A. 1999. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence align- ment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95-98.
41. HOOKER, J. D. 1870. Bothriospora corymbosa. Hooker' s Icones Plantarum 11, pl. 1069.
42. HOOKER, J. D. 1871. Phitopis multiflora. Hooker's Icones Plantarum 11, pl. 1093.
43. HOOKER, J. D. 1873. Rubiaceae. In G. Bentham and J. D. Hooker [eds.], Genera plantarum, vol. 2, 7-151. Lovell Reeve, Williams & Norgate, London, UK.
44. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND F. RONQUIST. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
45. HUTCHINSON, J. 1973. The families of flowering plants: arranged according to a new system based on their probable phylogeny, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, London, UK.
46. JANSEN, M. E., AND C. E. RIDSDALE. 1983. A revision of the genus Dolicholobium (Rubiaceae). Blumea 29: 251-311.
47. KAINULAINEN, K., A. MOULY, A. KHODABANDEH, AND B. BREMER. 2009. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Alberteae (Rubiaceae), with description of a new genus, Razafimandimbisonia. Taxon 58: 757-768.
48. KARSTEN, H. 1887. Bentham-Hooker's "Genera Plantarum" und flo-rae colombiae specimina selecta revidirt. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 8: 337-376.
49. KUHLMANN, J. G. 1925. Contribuição para o conhecimento de algu- mas plantas novas, contendo tambem um trabalho de critica e novas combinações. Archivos do Jardim Bot â nico do Rio de Janeiro 4: 347-365.
50. LAKNER, C., AND F. RONQUIST. 2008. Splitsmb v.0.1.1 [computer pro- gram]. Website http://sourceforge.net/projects/splitsmb.
51. LANTZ, H., AND B. BREMER. 2004. Phylogeny inferred from mor- phology and DNA data: Characterizing well-supported groups in Vanguerieae (Rubiaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 146: 257-283.
52. MADDISON, W. P., AND D. R. MADDISON. 2010. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 2.72 [computer program]. Website http://mesquiteproject.org.
53. MERRILL, E. D., AND L. M. PERRY. 1945. Plantae Papuanae Archboldianae, XVI. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 26: 231-266.
54. MOULY, A., S. G. RAZAFIMANDIMBISON, J. FLORENCE, J. JÉRÉMIE, AND B. BREMER. 2009. Paraphyly of Ixora and new tribal delimitation of Ixoreae (Rubiaceae): Inference from combined chloroplast (rps16, rbcL and trnT-F) sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 96: 146-160.
55. NOVOTNY, V., Y. BASSET, S. E. MILLER, G. D. WEIBLEN, B. BREMER, L. CIZEK, AND P. DROZD. 2002. Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest. Nature 416: 841-844.
56. NYLANDER, J. A. A. 2004. MrAIC.pl [computer program]. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. Website http://www.abc.se/~nylander/.
57. OLIVER, D. 1889. Emmenopterys henryi. Hooker' s Icones Plantarum 19, pl. 1823.
58. OLIVER, D. 1895. Mussaendopsis beccariana. Hooker' s Icones Plantarum 24, pl. 2388.
59. OXELMAN, B., M. BACKLUND, AND B. BREMER. 1999. Relationships of the Buddlejaceae s.l. investigated using parsimony jackknife and branch support analysis of chloroplast ndhF and rbcL sequence data. Systematic Botany 24: 164-182.
60. PENNINGTON, T. D., C. REYNEL, AND A. DAZA. 2004. Illustrated guide to the trees of Peru. David Hunt, Sherborne, UK.
61. PERSSON, C. 2000. Phylogeny of the neotropical Alibertia group (Rubiaceae), with emphasis on the genus Alibertia, inferred from ITS and 5S ribosomal DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany 87: 1018-1028.
62. PIESSCHAERT, F., E. ROBBRECHT, AND E. SMETS. 1997. Dialypetalanthus fuscescens Kuhlm (Dialypetalanthaceae): The problematic taxonomic position of an Amazonian endemic. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 84: 201-223.
63. PUFF, C., AND A. IGERSHEIM. 1994. The character states of Mussaendopsis Baill. (Rubiaceae-Coptosapelteae). Flora 189: 161-178.
64. RAZAFIMANDIMBISON, S. G., AND B. BREMER. 2001. Tribal delimitation of Naucleae (Cinchonoideae, Rubiaceae): Inference from molecular and morphological data. Systematics and Geography of Plants 71: 515-538.
65. RAZAFIMANDIMBISON, S. G., AND B. BREMER. 2002. Phylogeny and classification of Naucleeae s.l. (Rubiaceae) inferred from molecular (ITS, rbcL, and trnT-F) and morphological data. American Journal of Botany 89: 1027-1041.
66. RIZZINI, C. T., AND P. OCCHIONI. 1949. Dialypetalanthaceae. Lilloa 17: 243-288.
67. ROBBRECHT, E. 1988. Tropical woody Rubiaceae. Opera Botanica Belgica 1: 1-272.
68. RONQUIST, F., AND J. P. HUELSENBECK. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatic 19: 1572-1574.
69. ROVA, J. H. E. 1999. The Rondeletieae-Condamineeae-Sipaneeae com- plex (Rubiaceae). Ph.D. dissertation, Göteborg University, G ö teborg, Sweden.
70. ROVA, J. H. E., AND L. ANDERSSON. 1995. A reevaluation of the tribes Hippotideae and Tammsieae (Rubiaceae). Nordic Journal of Botany 15: 269-284.
71. ROVA, J. H. E., P. G. DELPRETE, L. ANDERSSON, AND V. A. ALBERT. 2002. A trnL-F cpDNA sequence study of the Condamineeae-Rondeletieae- Sipaneeae complex with implications on the phylogeny of the Rubiaceae. American Journal of Botany 89: 145-159.
72. RYDIN, C., K. KAINULAINEN, S. RAZAFIMANDIMBISON, J. SMEDMARK, AND B. BREMER. 2009. Deep divergences in the coffee family and the systematic position of Acranthera. Plant Systematics and Evolution 278: 101-123.
73. SAMSON, N., M. G. BAUSHER, S.-B. LEE, R. K. JANSEN, AND H. DANIELL 2007. The complete nucleotide sequence of the coffee (Coffea ara- bica L.) chloroplast genome: Organization and implications for bio- technology and phylogenetic relationships among angiosperms. Plant Biotechnology Journal 5: 339-353.
74. SCHUMANN, K. 1888. Über einige verkannte oder wenig gekannte Geschlechter der Rubiaceen S ü damerikas. Botanische Jahrbucher fur Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 1 0: 302-363.
75. SCHUMANN, K. 1889. Rubiaceae, trib. XX-IX. In C. F. P. von Martius, A. G. Eichler, and I. Urban [eds.], Flora brasiliensis, vol. 6, 125-466. Fleischer, Leipzig, Germany.
76. SCHUMANN, K. 1891. Rubiaceae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl [eds.], Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 4, part 4, 1-156. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
77. SCHUMANN, K. 1897. Rubiaceae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl [eds.], Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Nachträge zum II-IV, 309-316. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
78. SCHUMANN, K., AND K. KRAUSE. 1908. Dolichodelphys. Verhandlungen des Botanischen Vereins für die Provinz Brandenburg und die Angrenzenden Länder 50: 102-104.
79. SCHUMANN, K., AND K. LAUTERBACH. 1901. Die Flora der Deutschen Schutzgebiete in der Südsee. Gebrüder Borntraeger, Leipzig, Germany.
80. STADEN, R. 1996. The Staden sequence analysis package. Molecular Biotechnology 5: 233-241.
81. STANDLEY, P. C. 1930. The Rubiaceae of Colombia. Publications of the Field Museum of Natural History, Botanical Series 7: 1-176.
82. STANDLEY, P. C. 1931. Studies of American plants. V. Publications of the Field Museum of Natural History, Botanical series 8: 293-398.
83. STANDLEY, P. C. 1932. Holtonia, a new genus of trees of the family Rubiaceae. Tropical Woods 30: 37.
84. STANDLEY, P. C. 1936. Rubiaceae. In J. F. Macbride [ed.], Flora of Peru. Botany series, vol. 13, part 6. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
85. STEYERMARK, J. A. 1963. Dioicodendron, a new genus of Rubiaceae. Boletín de la Sociedad Venezolana de Ciencias Naturales 2 5: 23-28.
86. STEYERMARK, J. A. 1972. Botany of the Guayana Highlands-Part IX. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 23: 227-832.
87. STEYERMARK, J. A. 1974. Rubiaceae. In T. Lasser [ed.], Flora de Venezuela, vol. 9, parts 1-3, 1-2070. Fondo Editorial Acta Cientifica Venezolana, Caracas, Venezuela.
88. STEYERMARK, J. A., AND J. H. KIRKBRIDE.1975. ThegenusWittmackanthus (Rubiaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 62: 504-509.
89. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
90. TAYLOR, C. M. 2001. Rubiacearum americanarum magna hama pars IV: New taxa and combinations in Elaeagia and Warszewiczia (Rondeletieae) from Mexico, Central America, and Colombia. Novon 11: 274-279.
91. TAYLOR, C. M. 2002. Rubiacearum americanarum magna hama pars XI: A new species of Alseis (Calycophylleae) from Central America and notes on the morphology of this neotropical genus. Novon 12: 571-574.
92. TAYLOR, C. M., AND B. E. HAMMEL. 1993. Notes on Elaeagia myriantha, comb. nov. (Rubiaceae). Novon 3: 490-491.
93. TAYLOR, C. M., J. A. STEYERMARK, P. G. DELPRETE, A. VICENTINI, R. CORTÉS, D. ZAPPI, C. B. COSTA, AND E. A. ARAUJO. 2004. Rubiaceae. In J. A. Steyermark, P. E. Berry, K. Yatskievych, and B. K. Holst [eds.], Flora of the Venezuelan Guayana, vol. 8, 497-848. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
94. THOMPSON, J. D., D. G. HIGGINS, AND T. J. GIBSON. 1994. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence align- ment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673-4680.
95. VERDCOURT, B. 1958. Remarks on the classification of the Rubiaceae. Bulletin du Jardin Botanique de l' Étatà Bruxelles 28: 209-281.
96. WEDDELL, H. A. 1854. Schizocalyx. Notice sur quelques Rubiacées de l'Amérique tropicale. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Botanique, série 4, tome 1: 73-74.
97. YANG, Z., AND B. RANNALA. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: A Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 717-724.