Notes on calycophyllous Rubiaceae. Part I. Morphological comparisons of the genera Chimarrhis, Bathysa, and Calycophyllum, with new combinations and a new species, Chimarrhis gentryana

Brittonia

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 35-44

  Delprete, Piero G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bathysa; Calycophylleae; Calycophylls; Calycophyllum; Chimarrhis; Cinchoneae; Condamineeae; Pterophylls; Rondeletieae; Rubiaceae; Semaphyllanthe; Semaphylls

Indexed keywords

BATHYSA; CALYCOPHYLLEAE; CALYCOPHYLLUM; CHIMARRHIS; CHIMARRHIS TURBINATA; CINCHONEAE; CONDAMINEEAE; RONDELETIEAE; RUBIACEAE;

EID: 0041907312     PISSN: 0007196X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2807663     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aiello, A. 1979. A reexamination of Portlandia (Rubiaceae) and associated taxa. J. Arnold Arbor. 60: 38-123.
2. Andersson, L. 1993. Pollen characteristics of the tribe Calycophylleae, Cinchoneae, and Hillieae (Rubiaceae). Nordic J. Bot. 13: 405-417.
3. _. 1994. Calycophylleae. Pages 82-85. In: R. Harling & L. Andersson (eds.). Flora of Ecuador 50: 82-85.
4. _. 1995. Tribes and genera of the Cinchoneae complex. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 409-427.
5. _ & C. Persson. 1991. Circumscription of the tribe Cinchoneae (Rubiaceae) - a cladistic approach. Pl. Syst. Evol. 178: 65-94.
6. Boom, B. M. & M. T. V. do Amaral Campos. 1991. A preliminary account of the Rubiaceae of a Central Amazonian terra firme Forest. Bol. Mus. Para. Emílio Goeldi, sér. Bot. 7(2): 223-247.
7. Ducke, A. 1932. Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berlin-Dahlem 11: 475-476.
8. _. 1937. The Pão Mulato of Brazilian Amazonia. Trop. Woods 49: 1-4.
9. Leppik, E. E. 1956. The form and function of numeral patterns in flowers. Amer. J. Bot. 43: 445-455.
10. _. 1977. Calyx-borne semaphylls in tropical Rubiaceae. Phytomorphology 27: 161-168.
11. Puff, C., E. Robbrecht & V. Randianasolo. 1984. Observations on the SE African-Madagascan genus Alberta and its ally Nematostylis (Rubiaceae, Albertae), with a survey of the species and a discussion of the taxonomic position. Bull. Nat. Plantentuin Belg. 54: 293-365.
12. Robbrecht, E. 1988. Tropical woody Rubiaceae. Opera Bot. Belgica 1: 1-271.
13. Schumann, K. 1889. Rubiaceae. Pages 1-466. In: C. F. P. von Martius (ed.), Flora Brasiliensis 6(6).
14. _. 1891. Rubiaceae. Pages 1-156. In: A. Engler & K. Prantl (eds.). Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 4(4, 5).
15. Standley, P. C. 1929. Rubiaceae. Studies of american plants, Publ. Field. Mus., Bot. 4: 264-298, 324-345.
16. Steyermark, J. A. 1964. In: B. Maguire and collaborators. Botany of the Guayana Highlands. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 10: 186-278.
17. _. 1965. In: B. Maguire and collaborators, Botany of the Guayana Highlands. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 12: 230-436.
18. Taylor, C. M. 1992. Notes on the Rubiaceae of Perú. Novon 2: 438-442.
19. Verdcourt, B. 1958. Remarks on the classification of the Rubiaceae. Bull. Jard. Bot. Bruxelles 28: 209-281.