Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Alberteae (Rubiaceae), with description of a new genus, Razafimandimbisonia

Taxon

Volumn 58, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 757-768

  Kainulainen, Kent ^a,b   Mouly, Arnaud ^a,b   Khodabandeh, Anbar ^a,b   Bremer, Birgitta ^a,b  

^a ROYAL SWEDISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Airosperma; Alberta; Boholia; CpDNA; Crossopteryx; Madagascar; Nematostylis; Rubiaceae

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPLAST; CLADISTICS; DICOTYLEDON; DNA; ENDEMIC SPECIES; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; NEW GENUS;

AFRICA; ALBERTA; CANADA; INDIAN OCEAN; INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS; MADAGASCAR; NORTH AMERICA;

ALBERTEAE; CROSSOPTERYX; IXOROIDEAE; RUBIACEAE;

EID: 70349491213     PISSN: 00400262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tax.583006     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Alejandro, G.D., Razafimandimbison, S.G. & Liede-Schu- mann, S. 2005. Polyphyly of Mussaenda inferred from ITS and trnT-F data and its implication for generic limits in Mussaendeae (Rubiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 92: 544-557.
2. Andersson, L., & Antonelli, A. 2005. Phylogeny of the tribe Cinchoneae (Rubiaceae), its position in Cinchonoideae, and description of a new genus, Ciliosemina. Taxon 54: 17-28.
3. Andersson, L. & Rova, J.H.E. 1999. The rps16 intron and the phylogeny of the Rubioideae (Rubiaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 214: 161-186.
4. Andreasen, K., Baldwin, B.G. & Bremer, B. 1999. Phyloge- netic utility of the nuclear rDNA ITS region in subfamily Ixoroideae (Rubiaceae): comparisons with cpDNA rbcL sequence data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 217: 119-135.
5. Andreasen, K. & Bremer, B. 1996. Phylogeny of the subfamily Ixoroideae (Rubiaceae). Opera Bot. Belg. 7: 119-138.
6. Andreasen, K. & Bremer, B. 2000. Combined phylogenetic analysis in the Rubiaceae-Ixoroideae: morphology, nuclear and chloroplast DNA data. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1731-1748.
7. Backlund, M., Oxelman, B. & Bremer, B. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships within the Gentianales based on ndhF and rbcL sequences, with particular reference to the Logania- ceae. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1029-1043.
8. Bremekamp, C.E.B. 1952. The African species of Oldenlandia L. sensu Hiern et K. Schumann. Verh. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., Afd. Natuurk., Sect. 2 18: 11-24.
9. Bremekamp, C.E.B. 1966. Remarks on the position, the de- limitation and the subdivision of the Rubiaceae. Acta Bot. Neerl. 15: 1-33.
10. Bremer, B. 1984. The genus Steenisia (Rubiaceae) and its taxo- nomic position. Nord. J. Bot. 4: 333-345.
11. Bremer, B. 2009. A review of molecular phylogenetic studies of Rubiaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 96: 4-26.
12. Bremer, B., Andreasen, K. & Olsson, D. 1995. Subfamilial and tribal relationships in the Rubiaceae based on rbcL sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 82: 383-397.
13. Bremer, B., Bremer, K., Heidari, N., Erixon, P., Olmstead, R.G., Anderberg, A., Källersjö, M. & Barkhordarian, E. 2002. Phylogenetics of asterids based on 3 coding and 3 non-coding chloroplast DNA markers and the utility of non-coding DNA at higher taxonomic levels. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 24: 274-301.
14. Bremer, B. & Eriksson, T. 2009. Time tree of Rubiaceae: phy- logeny and dating the family, subfamilies, and tribes. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 170: 766-793.
15. Bremer, B. & Jansen, R.K. 1991. Comparative restriction site mapping of chloroplast DNA implies new phylogenetic relationships within Rubiaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 78: 198-213.
16. Bremer, B., Jansen, R.K., Oxelman, B., Backlund, M., Lantz, H. & Kim, K.J. 1999. More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny - case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae). Syst. Biol. 48: 413-435.
17. Bremer, B. & Thulin, M. 1998. Collapse of Isertieae, re-estab- lishment of Mussaendeae, and a new genus of Sabiceeae (Rubiaceae); phylogenetic relationships based on rbcL data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 211: 71-92.
18. Bridson, D.M. & Verdcourt, B. 2003. 94. Rubiaceae (part 3). Pp. 379-720 in: Pope, G.V. (ed.), Flora Zambesiaca. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London.
19. Cavaco, A. 1965. Remarques sur les genres Alberta E. Mey. et Nematostylis Hook. f. (Rubiaceae). Adansonia, ser. 2, 5: 515-518.
20. Cheek, M. & Dawson, S. 2000. A synoptic revision of Belono- phora (Rubiaceae). Kew Bull. 55: 63-80.
21. Darwin, S.P. 1979. A synopsis of the indigenous genera of Pacific Rubiaceae. Allertonia 2: 1-44.
22. Darwin, S.P. 1980. Notes on Airosperma (Rubiaceae), with a new species from Fiji. J. Arnold Arbor. 61: 95-105.
23. Davis, A.P., Chester, M., Maurin, O. & Fay, M.F. 2007. Search- ing for the relatives of Coffea (Rubiaceae, Ixoroideae): the circumscription and phylogeny of Coffeeae based on plastid sequence data and morphology. Amer. J. Bot. 94: 313-329.
24. Doyle, J.J. & Dickson, E.E. 1987. Preservation of plant-sam- ples for DNA restriction endonuclease analysis. Taxon 36: 715-722.
25. Hall, T.A. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/ NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 41: 95-98.
26. Hooker, J.D. 1873. Ordo LXXXIV. Rubiaceae. Pp. 7-151 in: Bentham, G. & Hooker, J.D. (eds.), Genera Plantarum, vol. 2, part 1. Lovell Reeve & Co., Williams & Norgate, London.
27. Huelsenbeck, J.P. & Ronquist, F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
28. Keay, R.W.J. 1958a. Notes on Rubiaceae for the flora of "West Tropical Africa" - II. Bull. Jard. Bot. État Bruxelles 28: 282-298.
29. Keay, R.W.J. 1958b. Randia and Gardenia in West Africa. Bull. Jard. Bot. État Bruxelles 28: 15-75.
30. Lantz, H., Andreasen, K. & Bremer, B. 2002. Nuclear rDNA ITS sequence data used to construct the first phylogeny of Vanguerieae (Rubiaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 230: 173-187.
31. Lantz, H. & Bremer, B. 2004. Phylogeny inferred from mor- phology and DNA data: characterizing well-supported groups in Vanguerieae (Rubiaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 146: 257-283.
32. Lidén, M., Fukuhara, T. & Axberg, T. 1995. Phylogeny of Corydalis, ITS and morphology. Pl. Syst. Evol. Suppl. 9: 183-188.
33. Malcomber, S.T. 2002. Phylogeny of Gaertnera Lam. (Ru- biaceae) based on multiple DNA markers: evidence of a rapid radiation in a widespread, morphologically diverse genus. Evolution 56: 42-57.
34. Maurin, O., Davis, A.P., Chester, M., Mvungi, E.F., Jaufeer- ally-Fakim, Y. & Fay, M.F. 2007. Towards a phylogeny for Coffea (Rubiaceae): identifying well-supported lineages based on nuclear and plastid DNA sequences. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 100: 1565-1583.
35. Mouly, A., Razafimandimbison, S.G., Achille, F., Haever- mans, T. & Bremer, B. 2007. Phylogenetic placement of Rhopalobrachium fragrans (Rubiaceae): evidence from molecular (rps16 and trnT-F) and morphological data. Syst. Bot. 32: 872-882.
36. Mouly, A., Razafimandimbison, S.G., Florence, J., Jérémie, J. & Bremer, B. 2009. Paraphyly of Ixora and new tribal delimitation of Ixoreae (Rubiaceae): inference from combined chloroplast (rps16, rbcL, and trnT-F) sequence data. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 96: 146-160.
37. Novotny, V., Basset, Y., Miller, S.E., Weiblen, G.D., Bremer, B., Cizek, L. & Drozd, P. 2002. Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest. Nature 416: 841- 844.
38. Nylander, J.A.A. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
39. Oxelman, B., Backlund, M. & Bremer, B. 1999. Relationships of the Buddlejaceae s.l. investigated using parsimony jack- knife and branch support analysis of chloroplast ndhF and rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 24: 164-182.
40. Oxelman, B., Lidén, M. & Berglund, D. 1997. Chloroplast rps16 intron phylogeny of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyl- laceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 206: 393-410.
41. Persson, C. 2000. Phylogeny of the neotropical Alibertia group (Rubiaceae), with emphasis on the genus Alibertia, inferred Kainulainen & al. from ITS and 5S ribosomal DNA sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 87: 1018-1028.
42. Popp, M. & Oxelman, B. 2001. Inferring the history of the polyploid Silene aegaea (Caryophyllaceae) using plastid and homoeologous nuclear DNA sequences. Molec. Phy- log. Evol. 20: 474-481.
43. Puff, C., Robbrecht, E. & Randrianasolo, V. 1984. Observa- tions on the SE African-Madagascan genus Alberta and its ally Nematostylis (Rubiaceae, Alberteae), with a survey of the species and a discussion of the taxonomic position. Bull. Jard. Bot. Natl. Belg. 54: 367-391.
44. Puff, C. & Rohrhofer, U. 1993. The character states and taxo- nomic position of the monotypic mangrove genus Scyph- iphora (Rubiaceae). Opera Bot. Belg. 6: 143-172.
45. Razafimandimbison, S.G. & Bremer, B. 2001 [publ. 2002]. Tribal delimitation of Naucleae (Cinchonoideae, Rubiaceae) inference from molecular and morphological data. Syst. Geogr. Plants 71: 515-538.
46. Razafimandimbison, S.G. & Bremer, B. 2002. Phylogeny and classification of Naucleeae s. l. (Rubiaceae) inferred from molecular (ITS, rbcL, and trnT-F) and morphological data. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1027-1041.
47. Robbrecht, E. 1980. The Hypobathreae (Rubiaceae - Ixoroi- deae) 1. Delimitation and division of a new tribe. Bull. Jard. Bot. Natl. Belg. 50: 69-77.
48. Robbrecht, E. 1988. Tropical woody Rubiaceae. Opera Bot. Belg. 1: 1-272.
49. Robbrecht, E., Bridson, D. & Deb, D.B. 1994. The South Indian genus Octotropis (Rubiacaee). Opera Bot. Belg. 6: 93-100.
50. Robbrecht, E. & Manen, J.-F. 2006. The major evolutionary lineages of the coffee family (Rubiaceae, angiosperms). Combined analysis (nDNA and cpDNA) to infer the posi-tion of Coptosapelta and Luculia, and supertree construc-tion based on rbcL, rps16, trnL-trnF and atpB-rbcL data. A new classification in two subfamilies, Cinchonoideae and Rubioideae. Syst. Geogr. Plants 76: 85-146.
51. Robbrecht, E. & Puff, C. 1986. A survey of the Gardenieae and related tribes (Rubiaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 108: 63-137.
52. Ronquist, F. & Huelsenbeck, J.P. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Baye- sian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioin- formatics 19: 1572-1574.
53. Rova, J.H.E., Delprete, P.G., Andersson, L. & Albert, V.A. 2002. A trnL-F cpDNA sequence study of the Condami- neeae-Rondeletieae-Sipaneeae complex with implications on the phylogeny of the Rubiaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 145-159.
54. Rydin, C., Razafimandimbison, S.G. & Bremer, B. 2008. Rare and enigmatic genera (Dunnia, Schizocolea, Col- letoecema), sisters to species-rich clades: phylogeny and aspects of conservation biology in the coffee family. Molec. Phylog. Evol. 48: 74-83.
55. Samson, N., Bausher, M.G., Lee, S.-B, Jansen, R.K. & Daniell, H. 2007. The complete nucleotide sequence of the coffee (Coffea arabica L.) chloroplast genome: organization and implications for biotechnology and phylogenetic rela- tionships among angiosperms. Pl. Biotechnol. J. 5: 339-353
56. Schumann, K. 1891. Rubiaceae. Pp. 1-156 in: Engler, A. & Prantl, K., (eds.), Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 30. Engelmann, Leipzig.
57. Shaw, J., Lickey, E.B., Beck, J.T., Farmer, S.B., Liu, W.S., Miller, J., Siripun, K.C., Winder, C.T., Schilling, E.E. & Small, R.L. 2005. The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 142-166.
58. Staden, R. 1996. The Staden Sequence Analysis Package. Molec. Biotechnol. 5: 233-241.
59. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), version 4.0B10. Sinauer, Sunderland
60. Taberlet, P., Gielly, L., Pautou, G. & Bouvet, J. 1991. Univer- sal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA. Pl. Molec. Biol. 17: 1105-1109.
61. Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. & Gibson, T.J. 1994. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680.
62. Verdcourt, B. 1958. Remarks on the classification of the Ru- biaceae. Bull. Jard. Bot. État Bruxelles 28: 209-281.
63. Wendel, J.F. & Doyle, J.J. 1998. Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. Pp. 265-296 in: Soltis, P., Soltis, D. & Doyle, J.J. (eds.), Mo- lecular Systematics of Plants II. Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht.