Polyphyly of Mussaenda inferred from ITS and trnT-F data and its implication for generic limits in Mussaendeae (Rubiaceae)

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 92, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 544-557

  Alejandro, Grecebio D ^a,b   Razafimandimbison, Sylvain G ^c,d   Llede Schumann, Sigrid ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SANTO TOMAS   (Philippines)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d ROYAL SWEDISH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biogeography; Bremeria; ITS; Mussaenda; Mussaendeae; Rubiaceae; trnT F

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENY; TAXONOMY;

APHAENANDRA; BREMERIA; LANDIOPSIS; MUSSAENDA; MUSSAENDEAE; PSEUDOMUSSAENDA; RUBIACEAE;

EID: 14644395595     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.92.3.544     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. ANDERSSON, L. 1996. Circumscription of the tribe Isertieae (Rubiaceae). Opera Botanica Belgica 7: 139-164.
2. ANDERSSON, L., AND J. H. E. ROVA. 1999. The rps16 intron and the phylogeny of the Rubioideae (Rubiaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 214: 161-186.
3. ANDREASEN, K., B. BALDWIN, AND B. BREMER. 1999. Phylogenetic utility of the nuclear rDNA ITS region in subfamily Ixoroideae (Rubiaceae): comparisons with cpDNA rbcL sequence data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 217: 119-135.
4. BAILLON, H. 1880. Histoire des plantes, vol. 7. Hachette, Paris, France.
5. BALDWIN, B. G., M. J. SANDERSON, J. M. PORTER, M. F. WOJCIECHOWSKI, C. S. CAMPBELL, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
6. BOSSER, J., AND D. LOBREAU-CALLEN. 1998. Landiopsis Capuron ex Bosser, genre nouveau de Rubiaceae de Madagascar. Adansonia 20: 131-137.
7. BREMEKAMP, C. E. B. 1937. Notes on the Rubiaceae of tropical Asia. Blumea 1Supplement: 112-122.
8. BREMEKAMP, C. E. B. 1947. A monograph of the genus Acranthera Arn. ex Meisn. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 28: 261-308.
9. BREMEKAMP, C. E. B. 1966. Remarks on the position, the delimitation and the subdivision of the Rubiaceae. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 15: 1-33.
10. BREMER, B. 1996. Combined and separate analyses of morphological and molecular data in the plant family Rubiaceae. Cladistics 12: 21-40.
11. BREMER, B., K. ANDREASEN, AND D. OLSSON. 1995. Subfamilial and tribal relationships in the Rubiaceae based on rbcL sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 383-397.
12. BREMER, B., R. J. JANSEN, B. OXELMAN, M. BACKLUND, H. LANTZ, AND K.-J. KIM. 1999. More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny - case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae). Systematic Biology 48: 413-435.
13. BREMER, B., AND J. E MANEN. 2000. Phylogeny and classification of the subfamily Rubioideae (Rubiaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 225: 43-72.
14. BREMER, B., AND M. THULIN. 1998. Collapse of Isertieae, re-establishment of Mussaendeae, and a new genus of Sabiceeae (Rubiaceae); phylogenetic relationships based on rbcL data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 211: 71-92.
15. BRIDSON, D. M., AND B. VERDCOURT. 1988. Isertieae. In R. M. Polhill [ed.], Flora of tropical East Africa, Rubiaceae, part 2. 460-475. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
16. CANDOLLE, A. P. DE. 1830. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis 4. Treutell & Würtz, Paris, France.
17. CHASE, M. W., AND H. H. HILLS. 1991. Silica gel: an ideal material for preservation of leaf samples for DNA studies. Taxon 40: 215-220.
18. CRAIB, W. G. 1932. Florae Siamensis Enumeratio. A list of the plants known from Siam with notes of their occurrence. Caprifoliaceae & Rubiaceae (in part), vol. 2, 1-145. Siam Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
19. DE VOOGD, C. N. A. 1929. Aphaenandra. De Tropische Natuur 18: 110.
20. DON, G. 1834. A general history of the dichlamydeous plants, vol. 3, Calyciflorae: viii + 867. London, UK.
21. FARRIS, J. S. 1989. The retention index and the rescaled consistency index. Cladistics 5: 417-419.
22. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
23. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
24. GOLDMAN, N., J. P. ANDERSON, AND A. G. RODRIGO. 2000. Likelihood-based tests of topologies in phylogenetics. Systematic Biology 49: 652-670.
25. HALLÉ, N. 1961. Contribution à l'étude biologique et taxonomique des Mussaendeae (Rubiaceae) d'Afrique tropicale. Adansonia 1: 266-298.
26. HOOKER, J. D. 1873. Ordo LXXXIV, Rubiaceae. In G. Bentham and J. D. Hooker [eds.], Genera plantarum ad exemplaria imprimis in herbariis kewensibus servata defirmata, vol. 2, 7-151. Lovell Reeve, London, UK.
27. HOOKER, J. D. 1880. Flora of British India, vol. 3, Mussaendeae, 86-92. Lovell Reeve, London, UK.
28. JOCHEMS, S. C. J. 1929. Aphaenandra. De Tropische Natuur 18: 153.
29. KLUGE, A. G., AND J. S. FARRIS. 1969. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Systematic Zoology 18: 1-32.
30. KURZ, S. 1887. Forest Flora of British Burma, vol. 2, Mussaenda, 55-58. M/S Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun, India and M/S Periodical Experts, Delhi, India.
31. LEPPIK, E. E. 1977. Calyx-borne semaphylls in tropical Rubiaceae. Phytomorphology 27: 161-168.
32. LI, H. L. 1943. Schizomussaenda, a new genus of the Rubiaceae. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 24: 99-102.
33. MABBERLEY, D. J. 1997. The plant-book - a portable dictionary of the vascular plants, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
34. MADDISON, D. R. 1991. The discovery and importance of multiple islands of most-parsimonious tress. Systematic Zoology 40: 315-328.
35. MEISNER, C. D. F. 1838. Plantarum vascularium genera secundum ordines naturales digesta 1, Acranthera, 162. Leipzig, Germany.
36. MEVE, U., AND S. LIEDE. 2002. A molecular phylogeny and generic rearrangement of the stapelioid Ceropegieae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 234: 171-209.
37. MEVE, U., AND S. LIEDE. 2004. Subtribal division of Ceropegieae. Taxon 53: 61-72.
38. MIQUEL, F A. W. 1857. Flora van Nederlandsch-Indië, vol. 2, Aphaenandra, 341-342. Amsterdam, Netherlands.
39. NAIKI, A., AND M. KATO. 1999. Pollination system and evolution of dioecy from distyly in Mussaenda parviflora (Rubiaceae). Plant Species Biology 14: 217-227.
40. NYLANDER, J. A. 2002. Mrmodeltest, version 1.1b. [Software program distributed online by the author]. Department of Systematic Zoology, EBC, Uppsala University, Sweden, website, http://www.ebc.uu.se/systzoo/staff/ nylander.html.
41. PERSSON, C. 2000. Phylogeny of the Neotropical Alibertia group (Rubiaceae), with emphasis on the genus Alibertia, inferred from ITS and 5S ribosomal DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany 87: 1018-1028.
42. POPP, M., AND B. OXELMAN. 2001. Inferring the history of the polyploid Siline aegaea (Caryophyllaceae) using plastid and homoeologous nuclear DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 20: 474-481.
43. PUANGSOMLEE, P., AND C. PUFF. 2001. Chromosome numbers of Thai Rubiaceae. Nordic Journal of Botany 21: 165-175.
44. PUFF, C., AND A. IGERSHEIM. 1994. The character states of Mussaendopsis Baill. (Rubiaceae-Coptosapelteae). Flora 189: 161-178.
45. PUFF, C., A. IGERSHEIM, AND U. ROHRHOFER. 1993. Pseudomussaenda and Schizomussaenda (Rubiaceae): close allies of Mussaenda. Bulletin de Jardin Botanique National de Belgique 62: 35-68.
46. RAZAFIMANDIMBISON, S. G., AND B. BREMER. 2001. Tribal delimitation of Naucleeae (Cinchonoideae, Rubiaceae): inference from molecular and morphological data. Systematics and Geography of Plants 71: 515-538.
47. RAZAFIMANDIMBISON, S. G., AND B. BREMER. 2002. Phylogeny and classification of Naucleeae s.l. (Rubiaceae) inferred from molecular (ITS, rbcL and trnT-F) and morphological data. American Journal of Botany 89: 1027-1041.
48. ROBBRECHT, E. 1988. Tropical woody Rubiaceae. Opera Botanica Belgica 1: 1-271.
49. ROVA, J. H. E., P. DELPRETE, L. ANDERSSON, AND V. ALBERT. 2002. A trnL-F cpDNA sequence study of the Condamineeae-Rondeletieae-Sipaneeae complex with implications on the phylogeny of the Rubiaceae. American Journal of Botany 89: 145-159.
50. SCHUMANN, K. 1891. Rubiaceae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl [eds.], Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 4, 1-156. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
51. SCHUMANN, K. 1897. Rubiaceae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl [eds.], Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Nachträge [1] zum 1I-1V, 309-316. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
52. SHIMODAIRA, H., AND M. HASEGAWA. 1999. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with application to phylogenetic inference. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 1114-1116.
53. SIMMONS, M. P., AND H. OCHOTERENA. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Sytematic Biology 49: 369-381.
54. SWOFFORD, D. L. 2000. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods), version 4.0b. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
55. TANGE, C. 1994. Neomussaenda (Rubiaceae), a new genus from Borneo. Nordic Journal of Botany 14: 495-500.
56. WERNHAM, H. E 1914. The Mussaendas of Madagascar. The Journal of Botany 52: 64-72.
57. WERNHAM, H. F. 1916. Pseudomussaenda: a new genus of Rubiaceae. The Journal of Botany 54: 297-301.