Dialypetalanthus fuscescens Kuhlm. (Dialypetalanthaceae): The problematic taxonomic position of an Amazonian endemic

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Volumn 84, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 201-223

  Piesschaert, Frederic ^a   Robbrecht, Elmar ^b   Smets, Erik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b BOTANIC GARDEN MEISE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIALYPETALANTHUS; DIALYPETALANTHUS FUSCESCENS; GENTIANALES; MYRTALES; RUBIACEAE;

EID: 0031461932     PISSN: 00266493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/2400002     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Andersson, L. 1992. A provisional checklist of neotropical Rubiaceae. Scripta Bot. Belg. 1: 7-9.
2. Baas, P. 1986. Terminology of imperforate tracheary elements - In defence of libriform fibres with minutely bordered pits. I. A. W. A. Bull., N.S. 7: 82-86.
3. Braune, W., A. Leman & H. Taubert. 1967. Pflanzenan-atomisches Praktikum: zur Einführung in die Anatomie der Vegetationsorgane der höheren Pflanzen (Spermatophyta). VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.
4. Bremekamp, C. E. B. 1940a. A monograph of the genus Pleiocarpidia K.Sch. (Rubiaceae). Recueil Trav. Bot. Néerl. 37: 198-236.
5. _. 1940b. The genus Praravinia Korth. (Rubiaceae) in Borneo and Celebes. Recueil Trav. Bot. Néerl. 37: 237-278.
6. _. 1966. Remarks on the position, the delimitation and the subdivision of the Rubiaceae. Acta Bot. Neerl. 15: 1-33.
7. Bremer, B. & L. Struwe. 1992. Phylogeny of the Rubiaceae and the Loganiaceae: Congruence or conflict between morphological and molecular data? Amer. J. Bot. 79: 1171-1184.
8. Corner, E. J. H. 1976. The Seeds of Dicotyledons, Vol. 1. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
9. Cronquist, A. 1968. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
10. _. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants, Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
11. _. 1988. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants, 2nd ed. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.
12. Dahlgren, G. 1991. Steps toward a natural system of the dicotyledons: Embryological characters. Aliso 13: 107-165.
13. Dahlgren, R. 1975. A system of classification of the angiosperms to be used to demonstrate the distribution of characters. Bot. Not. 128: 119-147.
14. _. 1980. A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 80: 91-124.
15. _. 1983. General aspects of angiosperm evolution and macrosystematics. Nordic J. Bot. 3: 119-149.
16. _ & R. F. Thorne. 1984. The order Myrtales: Circumscription, variation and relationships. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 71: 633-699.
17. D'Arcy, W. G., R. C. Keating & S. L. Buchmann. 1996. The calcium oxalate package or so-called resorption tissue in some angiosperm anthers. Pp. 159-191 in W. G. D'Arcy & R. C. Keating (editors). The Anther. Form, Function and Phylogeny. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
18. Darnley-Gibbs, R. 1974. Chemotaxonomy of Flowering Plants. Vol. III. McGill. Queens Univ. Press, Montreal.
19. Darwin, S. P. 1977. The genus Mastixiodendron (Rubiaceae). J. Arnold Arbor. 58: 349-381.
20. _. 1979. A synopsis of the indigenous genera of Pacific Rubiaceae. Allertonia 2: 1-44.
21. De Block, P. & E. Robbrecht. 1997. On the ovary structure of Dictyandra and Leptactina compared with other Pavetteae (Rubiaceae-Ixoroideae), or evolution from multiovulate to uniovulate placentas. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 119: 1-15.
22. De Laet, J. & E. Smets. 1996. A commentary on the circumscription and evolution of the order Gentianales, with special emphasis on the position of the Rubiaceae. Opera Bot. Belg. 7: 11-18.
23. Delprete, P. G. 1995. Three new species of Rustia (Rubiaceae, Condamineeae) from Panama and Ecuador. Novon 5: 133-139.
24. _. 1996. Evaluation of the tribes Chiococceae, Condamineeae and Catesbeeae (Rubiaceae) based on morphological characters. Opera Bot. Belg. 7: 165-192.
25. Emberger, L. 1960. Les végétaux vasculaires. Pp. 754-1539 in M. Chadefaud & L. Emberger (editors), Traité de botanique (systématique), tome II. Masson et Cie éditeurs, Paris.
26. Erbar, C. 1995. On the floral development of Sphenoclea zeylanica (Sphenocleaceae, Campanulales) - SEM investigations on herbarium material. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 117:469-483.
27. Erdtman, G. 1971. Pollen Morphology and Plant Taxonomy - Angiosperms (An introduction to palynology), Vol. I. Hafner Publishing, New York.
28. Florence, J. 1986. Sertum Polynesicum II. Rubiaceae nouvelles des îles Marquises (Polynésie Française). Bull. Mus. Nat. Hist. Nat., 4e sér., B, Adansonia 8: 3-11.
29. Frohne, D. & U. Jensen. 1992. Systematik des Pflanzenreichs: unter besonderer Berücksichtigung chemischer Merkmale und pflanzlicher Drogen, 4., Aufl. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart.
30. Grant, V. 1950. The protection of ovules in flowering plants. Evolution 4: 179-201.
31. Hegnauer, R. 1990. Chemotaxonomie der Pflanzen 9. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel.
32. Hickey, C. J. 1988. A revised classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. Pp. 25-39 in C. R. Metcalfe & L. Chalk (editors), Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, 2nd ed., Vol. 1, Systematic Anatomy of the Leaf and Stem. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
33. Holmgren, P. K., N. H. Holmgren & L. C. Barnett (editors). 1990. Index Herbariorum. Part 1: The Herbaria of the World, ed. 8. New York Botanical Garden, New York.
34. Hutchinson, J. 1959. The Families of Flowering Plants Arranged According to a New System Based on their Probable Phylogeny, 2nd ed., Vol. 1, Dicotyledons. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
35. Huysmans, S., E. Robbrecht & E. Smets. 1994. Are the genera Hallea and Mitragyna (Rubiaceae-Coptosapelteae) pollen morphologically distinct? Blumea 39: 321-340
36. _, G. El-Ghazaly, S. Nilsson & E. Smets. 1997. Orbicules: A preliminary survey and their systematic value in the Cinchonoideae (Rubiaceae). Canad. J. Bot. In press.
37. Juncosa, A. M. & P. B. Tomlinson. 1987. Floral development in mangrove Rhizophoraceae. Amer. J. Bot. 74: 1263-1279.
38. Kuhlmann, J. G. 1925. Contribução para o conhecimento de algumas plantas novas, contendo tambem um trabalho de critica e novas combinaçés. Arch. Jard. Bot. Rio de Janeiro 4: 347-365.
39. _. 1942. Rubiaceae. Dialypetalanthus, Kuhlmann. Rodriguésia 6: 25-26.
40. Lee, Y. S. & D. E. Fairbrothers. 1978. Serological approaches to the systematics of the Rubiaceae and related families. Taxon 27: 159-185.
41. Leinfellner, W. 1951. Die U-förmiche Plazenta als der Plazentationtypus der Angiospermen. Oesterr. Bot. Z. 98: 338-358.
42. Maas, P. J. M. & L. Y. T. Westra. 1993. Neotropical Plant Families. A Concise Guide to Families of Vascular Plants in the Neotropics. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein.
43. Melchior, H. 1964. Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien, ed. 12, Gebr. Borntraeger, Berlin.
44. Nicholas, A. & H. Baijnath. 1994. A consensus classification for the order Gentianales with additional details on the suborder Apocynineae. Bot. Rev. 60: 440-482.
45. Occhioni, P. & C. T. Rizzini. 1952. Dialypetalanthaceae. Rodriguésia 15, 27: 181-183.
46. Peterson, R. L., R. E. Hersey & J. D. Brisson. 1978. Embedding softened herbarium material in Spurr's resin for histological studies. Stain Technol. 53: 1-9.
47. Renner, S. S. 1993. Phylogeny and classification of the Melastomataceae and Memecylaceae. Nordic J. Bot. 13: 519-540.
48. Rizzini, C. T. & P. Occhioni. 1949. 'Dialypetalanthaceae.' Lilloa 17: 243-288.
49. Robbrecht, E. 1988. Tropical woody Rubiaceae. Opera Bot. Belg. 1: 1-271.
50. _. 1994. Advances in Rubiaceae macrosystematics. Opera Bot. Belg. 6: 1-200.
51. _ & C. Puff. 1986. A survey of the Gardenieae and related tribes (Rubiaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 108: 63-137.
52. Ronse Decraene, L.-P. & E. F. Smets. 1991. The floral ontogeny of some members of the Phytolaccaceae (sub-family Rivinoideae) with a discussion on the evolution of the androecium in the Rivinoideae. Biol. Jaarb. 59: 77-99.
53. -& _. 1992. Complex polyandry in the Magnoliatae: Definition, distribution and systematic value. Nordic J. Bot. 12: 621-649.
54. Rutishauser, R., L. P. Ronse Decraene, E. Smets & I. Mendoza-Heuer. 1997. Theligonum cynocrambe - The developmental morphology of a peculiar rubiaceous herb. Pl. Syst. Evol. In press.
55. Schumann, K. 1891. Rubiaceae. Pp. 1-156 in A. Engler & K. Prantl (editors), Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 4 (4). Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
56. Smets, E. 1988. La présence des "nectaria persistentia" chez les Magnoliophytina (Angiospermes). Candollea 43: 709-716.
57. Smith, A. C. & S. P. Darwin. 1988. Rubiaceae. Pp. 143-376 in A. C. Smith (editor), Flora Vitiensis Nova. A New Flora of Fiji (spermatophytes only). Vol. 4. Pacific Tropical Botanical Garden, Lawai, Kauai; Hawaii.
58. Sprague, T. A. 1940. Taxonomic botany with special reference to the angiosperms. Pp. 435-454 in J. Huxley (editor), The New Systematics. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
59. Stebbins, G. L. 1974. Flowering Plants. Evolution Above the Species Level. The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Massachusetts.
60. Stoffelen, P., E. Robbrecht & E. Smets. 1996. A revision of Corynanthe and Pausinystalia (African Rubiaceae-Coptosapelteae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 120: 287-326.
61. Takhtajan, A. 1986. Floristic Regions of the World. Univ. California Press, California.
62. Theobald, W. L., J. L. Krahulik & R. C. Rollins. 1988. Pp. 40-53 in C. R. Metcalfe & L. Chalk (editors), Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, 2nd ed., Vol. 1, Systematic Anatomy of the Leaf and Stem. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
63. Verdcourt, B. 1958. Remarks on the classification of the Rubiaceae. Bull. Jard. Bot. Natl. Belgique 28: 210-290.
64. Watson, L. & M. J. Dallwitz. 1991. The families of angiosperms - Automated descriptions, with interactive identification and information retrieval. Austral. Syst. Bot. 4: 681-695.
65. Weberling, F. 1992. Morphology of Flowers and Inflorescences. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
66. Willemstein, S. C. 1987. An Evolutionary Basis for Pollination Ecology. Leiden Botanical Series 10. Leiden Univ. Press, Leiden.