Demonstration-based training: A review of instructional features

Human Factors

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 596-609

  Rosen, Michael A ^a   Salas, Eduardo ^a   Pavlas, Davin ^a   Jensen, Randy ^b   Fu, Dan ^b   Lampton, Donald ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^b STOTTLER HENKE ASSOCIATES INC   (United States)

^c US Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

demonstration; demonstration based training; instructional design; instructional systems; observational learning; training

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE LEARNERS; BASIC SCIENCE; CONCURRENT ACTIVITIES; DELIVERY METHODS; INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNS; INSTRUCTIONAL SYSTEM; OBSERVATIONAL LEARNING; PERFORMANCE SUPPORT; SYSTEMATIC RESEARCH; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAINING; TRAINING SYSTEMS;

TEACHING;

DEMONSTRATIONS;

BIOENGINEERING; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; REVIEW;

HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING;

EID: 78649681604     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: 15478181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018720810381071     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Ashford, D., Davids, K., & Bennett, S.J. (2006). Observational modeling effects for movement dynamics and movement outcome measures across differing task constraints: A meta-analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 38 (3). 185-205.
2. Austin, S., & Laurence, M. (1992). An empirical study of the SyberVision golf videotape. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 875-881.
3. Baddeley, A. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
4. Baggett, P. (1987). Learning a procedure from multimedia instructions: The effects of film and practice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 183-195.
5. Baldwin, T.T. (1992). Effects of alternative modeling strategies on outcomes of interpersonal-skills training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 147-154.
6. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Rockville, MD: National Institutes of Mental Health.
7. Barlow, M. (2006, May). After action review of simulation results: Impact of presentation modality. Paper presented at the SimTecT, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.siaa.asn.au/get/2423620432.pdf
8. Bell, B.S., & Kozlowski, S.W.J. (2008). Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 296-316.
9. Berry, D.C. (1991). The role of action in implicit learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43, 881-906.
10. Blandin, Y., Lhuisset, L., & Proteau, L. (1999). Cognitive processes underlying observational learning of motor skills. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 957-979.
11. Blandin, Y., & Proteau, L. (2000). On the cognitive basis of observational learning: Development of mechanisms for the detection and correction of errors. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 846-867.
12. Burnaska, R.F. (1976). The effects of behavior modeling training upon managers' behaviors and employees' perceptions. Personnel Psychology, 29, 329-335.
13. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Rhodenizer, L., Salas, E., & Bowers, C.A. (1998). A framework for understanding pre-practice conditions and their impact on learning. Personnel Psychology, 51, 291-320.
14. Chou, H.W. (2001). Effects of training method and computer anxiety on learning performance and self-efficacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 51-69.
15. Colquitt, J.A., LePine, J.A., & Noe, R.A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 678-707.
16. Cox, R., McKendree, J., Tobin, R., Lee, J., & Mayes, T. (1999). Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse. Instructional Science, 27, 431-458.
17. Cumming, J., Clark, S.E., Ste-Marie, D.M., McCullagh, P., & Hall, C. (2005). The functions of observational learning questionnaire (FOLQ). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 6, 517-537.
18. Davis, F.D., & Yi, M.Y. (2004). Improving computer skill training: Behavior modeling, symbolic mental rehearsal, and the role of knowledge structures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 509-523.
19. Decker, P.J. (1980). Effects of symbolic coding and rehearsal in behavior-modeling training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 627-634.
20. Decker, P.J. (1982). The enhancement of behavior modeling training of supervisory skills by the inclusion of retention processes. Personnel Psychology, 35, 323-332.
21. Decker, P.J. (1984). Effects of different symbolic coding stimuli in behavior modeling training. Personnel Psychology, 37, 711-720.
22. Decker, P.J., & Nathan, B.R. (1985). Behavior modeling training: Principles and applications. New York, NY: Praeger.
23. Doo, M.Y. (2005). The effects of presentation format for behavior modeling of interpersonal skills in online instruction. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 14, 213-235.
24. Driskell, J.E., Copper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance ? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 481-492.
25. Ehrenstein, A., Walker, B.N., Czerwinski, M., & Feldman, E.M. (1997). Some fundamentals of training and transfer: Practice benefits are not automatic. In M. A. Quinones & A. Ehrenstein (Eds.), Training for a rapidly changing workplace: Applications of psychological research (pp. 119-147). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
26. Ellis, S., & Davidi, I. (2005). After-event reviews: Drawing lessons from successful and failed experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 857-871.
27. Ferrari, M. (1996). Observing the observer: Self-regulation in the observational learning of motor skills. Developmental Review, 16, 203-240.
28. Fiore, S. M., & Salas, E. (Eds.). (2007). Toward a science of distributed learning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
29. Ford, J.K., & Kraiger, K. (1995). The application of cognitive constructs and principles to the instructional systems model of training: Implications for needs assessment, design, and transfer. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1-48). New York, NY: Wiley.
30. Fowlkes, J.E., Dwyer, D.J., Oser, R.L., & Salas, E. (1998). Event-based approach to training (EBAT). International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8, 209-221. (Pubitemid 128337446)
31. Gagnè, R.M. (1984). Learning outcomes and their effects: Useful categories of human performance. American Psychologist, 39, 377-385.
32. Gray, J.T., Neisser, U., Shapiro, B.A., & Kouns, S. (1991). Observational learning of ballet sequences: The role of kinematic information. Ecological Psychology, 3, 121-134.
33. Hard, B.M., Lozano, S.C., & Tversky, B. (2006). Hierarchical encoding of behavior: Translating perception into action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 588-608.
34. Harrison, J.K. (1992). Individual and combined effects of behavior modeling and the cultural assimilator in cross-cultural management training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 952-962.
35. Heimbeck, D., Frese, M., Sonnentag, S., & Keith, N. (2003). Integrating errors into the training process: The function of error management instructions and the role of goal orientation. Personnel Psychology, 56, 333-361.
36. Heyes, C. (2001). Causes and consequences of imitation. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 253-261.
37. Hogan, P.M., Hakel, M.D., & Decker, P.J. (1986). Effects of trainee-generated versus trainer-provided rule codes on generalization in behavior-modeling training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 469-473.
38. Jentsch, F., Bowers, C., & Salas, E. (2001). What determines whether observers recognize targeted behaviors in modeling displays ? Human Factors, 43, 496-507.
39. Johnson, R.T., Johnson, D.W., & Stanne, M.B. (1985). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on computer-assisted instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 668-677.
40. Kanfer, R. (1991). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 75-170). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
41. Kirschner, P.A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R.E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based training. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86.
42. Kohl, R.M., & Shea, C.H. (1992). Pew (1966) revisited: Acquisition of hierarchical control as a function of observational practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24, 247-260.
43. Kraut, A.I. (1976). Developing managerial skills via modeling techniques: Some positive research findings. A symposium. Personnel Psychology, 29, 325-328.
44. Latham, G.P., & Saari, L.M. (1979). Application of social-learning theory to training supervisors through behavioral modeling. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 239-246.
45. Lumsdaine, A.A. (1961). A symposium on experimental studies of cue and response factors in group and individual learning from instructional media. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
46. Mann, R.B., & Decker, P.J. (1984). The effect of key behavior distinctiveness on generalization and recall in behavior modeling training. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 900-910.
47. Martens, R., Burwitz, L., & Zuckerman, J. (1976). Modeling effects on motor performance. Research Quarterly, 47, 277-291.
48. Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
49. McCullagh, P. (1986). Model status as a determinant of observational learning and performance. Journal of Sport Psychology, 8, 319-331.
50. Moreno, R. (2006). Learning in high-tech and multimedia environments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 63-67.
51. Moses, J.L., & Ritchie, R.J. (1976). Supervisory relationships training: A behavioral evaluation of a behavior modeling program. Personnel Psychology, 29, 337-343.
52. Mosher, B., & Nguyen, F. (2008). Training is broken. Training and Development, 62, 23-25.
53. Oberauer, K. (2006). Is the focus of attention in working memory expanded through practice? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 32, 197-214.
54. Palmiter, S.L., & Elkerton, J. (1993). Animated demonstrations for learning procedural computer-based tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 193-216.
55. Pashler, H., Johnston, J.C., & Ruthruff, E. (2001). Attention and performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 629-651.
56. Petrosini, L., Graziano, A., Mandolesi, L., Neri, P., Molinari, M., & Leggio, M.G. (2003). Watch how to do it! New advances in learning by observation. Brain Research Reviews, 42, 252-264.
57. Prislin, R., Jordan, J.A., Worchel, S., Tschan Semmer, F., & Shebilske, W.L. (1996). Effects of group discussion on acquisition of complex skills. Human Factors, 38, 404-416.
58. Ritter, F. E., Nerb, J., Lehtinen, E., & O'Shea, T. M. (Eds.). (2007). In order to learn: How the sequence of topics influences learning. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
59. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
60. Robinson, J.C. (1982). Developing managers through behavior modeling. San Diego, CA: Learning Concepts.
61. Russell, J.S., Wexley, K.N., & Hunter, J.E. (1984). Questioning the effectiveness of behavior modeling training in an industrial setting. Personnel Psychology, 37, 465-481.
62. Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 471-499.
63. Salas, E., Priest, H.A., Wilson, K.A., & Burke, C.S. (2006). Scenario-based training: Improving military mission performance and adaptability. In A. B. Adler, C. A. Castro, & T. W. Britt (Ed.), Military life: The psychology of serving in peace and combat. Vol. 2: Operational stress (pp. 32-53). Westport, CT: Praeger Security International.
64. Schlechter, T.M., & Anthony, J. (1996). An examination of the value of demonstration tapes for the virtual training program (No. 1688). Fort Knox, KY: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
65. Schwartz, D.L., & Bransford, J.D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 475-522.
66. Scully, D., & Carnegie, E. (1998). Observational learning in motor skill acquisition: A look at demonstration. Irish Journal of Psychology, 19, 472-485.
67. Shebilske, W.L., Gildea, K.M., Freeman, J., & Levchuk, G. (2006). A Benchmarked Experiential System for Training (BEST) and dynamic systems theory. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 2649-2653). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
68. Simon, S.J., & Werner, J.M. (1996). Computer training through behavior modeling, self-paced, and instructional approaches: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 648-659.
69. Stoffey, R.W., & Reilly, R.R. (1997). Training appraisees to participate in appraisal: Effects on appraisers and appraisees. Journal of Business Psychology, 12, 219-239.
70. Tannenbaum, S.I., & Yukl, G. (1992). Training and development in work organizations. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 399-441.
71. Taylor, P.J., Russ-Eft, D.F., & Chan, D.W.L. (2005). A meta-analytic review of behavior modeling training. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 692-709.
72. Tulving, E., & Thompson, D.M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
73. Vogel-Walcutt, J.J., Nicholson, D., & Bowers, C.A. (2009). Translating learning theories into physiological hypotheses. In D. D. Schmorrow (Ed.), Foundations of augmented cognition: Neuroergonomics and operational neuroscience (pp. 678-686). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
74. Wexley, K.N., & Latham, G.P. (2002). Developing and training human resources in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
75. Williams, A.M., Davids, K., & Williams, J.G. (1999). Visual perception and action in sport. London, England: Spon.
76. Yi, M.Y., & Davis, F.D. (2003). Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Information Systems Research, 14, 146-169.