On the cognitive basis of observational learning: Development of mechanisms for the detection and correction of errors

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 846-867

  Blandin, Yannick ^a   Proteau, Luc ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; OBSERVATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; OBSERVATION; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0034252038     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755917     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Adams, J.A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111-150.
2. Adams, J.A. (1986). Use of the model's knowledge of results to increase the observer's performance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 12, 89-98.
3. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Bird, A.M., & Rikli, R. (1983). Observational learning and practice variability. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 54, 1-4.
6. Blandin, Y., Lhuisset, L., & Proteau, L. (1999). Cognitive processes underlying observational learning of motor skills. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 52A, 957-979.
7. Blandin, Y., & Proteau, L. (1997). On the cognitive processes involved in the contextual interference effect. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 32, 211-233.
8. Blandin, Y., Proteau, L., & Alain, C. (1993). Apprentissage par observation d'une tâche d'anticipation-coïncidence [Observational learning of a coincident-anticipation task]. Science et Motricité, 20, 35-42.
9. Blandin, Y., Proteau, L., & Alain, C. (1994). On the cognitive processes underlying contextual interference effect and observational learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 26, 18-26.
10. Buekers, M.J., & Magill, R.A. (1995). The role of task experience and prior knowledge for detecting invalid augmented feedback while learning a motor skill. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 84-97.
11. Buekers, M.J., Magill, R.A., & Hall, K.G. (1992). The effect of erroneous knowledge of results on skill acquisition when augmented information is redundant. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 105-117.
12. Carroll, W.R., & Bandura, A. (1982). The role of visual monitoring in observational learning of action patterns: Making the unobservable observable. Journal of Motor Behavior, 14, 153-167.
13. Carroll, W.R., & Bandura, A. (1987). Translating cognition into action: The role of visual guidance in observational learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19, 385-398.
14. Carroll, W.R., & Bandura, A. (1990). Representational guidance of action production in observational learning: A causal analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 85-97.
15. Deakin, J.M., & Proteau, L. (in press). The role of scheduling on learning through observation. Journal of Motor Behaviour.
16. Greenhouse, S.W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24, 95-112.
17. Landers, D.M. (1975). Observational learning of a motor skill: Temporal spacing of demonstrations and audience presence. Journal of Motor Behavior, 7, 281-287.
18. Magill, R.A., Chamberlin, C.J., & Hall, K.G. (1991). Verbal knowledge of results as redundant information for learning an anticipation timing skill. Human Movement Science, 10, 485-507.
19. Martens, R., Burwitz, L., & Zuckerman, J. (1976). Modeling effects on motor performance. Research Quarterly, 47, 277-291.
20. McCraken, H.D., & Stelmach, G.E. (1977). A test of the schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. In D.M. Landers & R.W. Christina (Eds.), Psychology of motor behavior and sport (pp. 25-35). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
21. McCullagh, P., & Caird, J.K. (1990). Correct and learning models and the use of the model knowledge of results in the acquisition and retention of a motor skill. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 18, 107-116.
22. McCullagh, P., Weiss, M.R., & Ross, D. (1989). Modeling considerations in motor skill acquisition and performance: An integrated approach. In K.B. Pandolf (Ed.), Exercise and sport sciences reviews (pp. 475-513). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
23. Newell, K.M. (1976). Motor learning without knowledge of results through the development of a response recognition mechanism. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 209-217.
24. Newell, K.M., & Shapiro, D.C. (1976). Variability of practice and transfer of training: Some evidence toward a schema view of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 233-243.
25. Pollock, B.J., & Lee, T.D. (1992). Effects of the model's skill level on observational learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 25-29.
26. Rubin, W.M. (1978). Application of signal detection theory to error detection in ballistic motor skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 311-320.
27. Schmidt, R.A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225-260.
28. Schmidt, R.A. (1988). Motor learning and control (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
29. Schmidt, R.A., Lange, C., & Young, D.E. (1990). Optimizing summary knowledge of results for skill learning. Human Movement Science, 9, 325-248.
30. Schmidt, R.A., & White, J.L. (1972). Evidence for an error detection mechanism in motor skills: A test of Adams' closed-loop theory. Journal of Motor Behavior, 4, 143-153.
31. Sheffield, F.D. (1961). Theoretical consideration in the learning of complex sequential task from demonstration and practice. In A.A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student response in programmed instruction (pp. 13-32). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council.
32. Southard, D., & Higgins, T. (1987). Changing movement patterns: Effects of demonstration and practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58, 77-80.
33. Van Rossum, J.H.A. (1990). Schmidt's schema theory: The empirical base of the variability of practice hypothesis. A critical analysis. Human Movement Science, 9, 387-435.
34. Weeks, D.L. (1992). A comparison of modeling modalities in the observational learning of an externally paced skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 63, 373-380.
35. Winer, B.J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.
36. Wulf, G., Schmidt, R.A., & Deubel, H. (1993). Reduced feedback frequency enhances generalized motor program learning but not parameterization learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1134-1150.
37. Zelaznik, H.N. (1977). Transfer in rapid timing tasks: An examination of the role of variability in practice. In R.W. Christina & D.M. Landers (Eds.), Psychology of motor behavior and sport (pp. 36-43), Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
38. Zelaznik, H.N., Shapiro, D.C., & Newell, K.M. (1978). On the structure of the motor recognition memory. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 313-323.
39. Zelaznik, H.N., & Spring, J. (1976). Feedback in response recognition and production. Journal of Motor Behavior, 8, 309-312.