Novelty seeking and drug use: Contribution of an animal model

Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 367-375

  Cain, Mary E ^a,b   Saucier, Donald A ^a   Bardo, Michael T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Amphetamine; Individual differences; Novelty seeking; Self administration

Indexed keywords

DEXAMPHETAMINE; SUCROSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG ABUSE; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; LOCOMOTION; MALE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION; NONHUMAN; OBJECT RELATION; PLACE PREFERENCE; PREDICTION; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; SENSATION; SENSATION SEEKING;

AMPHETAMINE; ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INFUSIONS, INTRAVENOUS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF ADMINISTRATION; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; SUCROSE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 29444448444     PISSN: 10641297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1064-1297.13.4.367     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. 2 receptors in novelty-maintained place preference. Experimental Clinical Psychopharmacology, 1, 101-109.
2. Bardo, M. T., Donohew, R. L., & Harrington, N. G. (1996). Psychobiology of novelty seeking and drug seeking behavior. Behavioural Brain Research, 77, 23-43.
3. Bevins, R. A., Klebaur, J. E., & Bardo, M. T. (1997). Individual differences in response to novelty, amphetamine-induced activity and drug discrimination in rats. Behavioral Pharmacology, 8, 113-123.
4. Bissonnette, V., Ickes, W., Bernstein, I., & Knowles, E. (1990a). , Item variances and median splits: Some discouraging and disquieting findings. Journal of Personality, 58, 595-601.
5. Bissonnette, V., Ickes, W., Bernstein, I., & Knowles, E. (1990b). Personality moderating variables: A warning about statistical artifact and a comparison of analytic techniques. Journal of Personality, 58, 567-587.
6. Cain, M. E., Smith, C. M. & Bardo, M. T. (2004). The effect of novelty on amphetamine self-administration in rats classified as high and low responclers. Psychopharmacology, 176, 129-138.
7. Cloninger, C. R. (1987). A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. Archives af General Psychiatry, 44, 573-588.
8. Cohen, J. (1968). Multiple regression as a general data analytic strategy. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 167-226.
9. Cohen, J. (1978). Partialed products are interactions: Partialed powers are curve components. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 858-866.
10. Cohen, J. (1983). The cost of dichotomization. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249-253.
11. DeSousa, N. J., Bush, D. E., & Vaccarino, F. J. (2000). Self-administration of intravenous amphetamine is predicted by individual differences in sucrose feeding in rats. Psychopharmacology, 148, 52-58.
12. Donohew, R. L., Hoyle, R. H., Clayton, R. R., Skinner, W. F., Colon, S. E., & Rice, R. E. (1999). Sensation seeking and drug use by adolescents and their friends: Models for marijuana and alcohol. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 60, 622-631.
13. Donohew, R. L., Lorch, E. P., & Palmgreen, P. (1991). Sensation seeking and targeting of televised anti-drug PSAs. In L. Donohew, H. Sypher, & W. J. Bukoski (Eds.), Persuasive communication and drug abuse prevention (pp. 209-226). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Ennaceur, A., & Delacour, J. (1988). A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: Behavioral data. Behavioural Brain Research, 31, 47-59.
15. Humphreys, L. G., & Fleishman, A. (1974). Pseudo-orthogonal and other analysis of variance designs involving individual-difference variables. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 464-472.
16. Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources. Commission on Life Sciences National Research Council. (1996). Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17. Klebaur, J. E., & Bardo, M. T. (1999). Individual differences in novelty seeking on the playground maze predict amphetamine conditioned place preference. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 63, 131-136.
18. Klebaur, J. E., Bevins, R. A., Segar, T. M., & Bardo, M. T. (2001a). Individual differences in behavioral responses to novelty and amphetamine self-administration in male and female rats. Behavioral Pharmacology, 12, 267-275.
19. Klebaur, J. E., Phillips, S. B., Kelly, T. H., & Bardo, M. T. (2001b). Exposure to novel environmental stimuli decreases amphetamine self-administration in rats. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 9, 372-379.
20. Kruzich, P. J., Grimm, J. W., Rustay, N. R., Parks, C. D., & See, R. E. (1999). Predicting relapse to cocaine-seeking behavior: A multiple regression approach. Behavioral Pharmacology, 10, 513-521.
21. Martin, C. A., Kelly, T. H., Rayens, M., Brogli, B. R., Brenzel, A., Smith, W., et al. (2002). Sensation seeking, puberty, and nicotine, alcohol, and marijuana use in adolescence. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 1495-1502.
22. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1993). Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 181-190.
23. Misslin, R., Herzog, F., Koch, B., & Ropartz, P. (1982). Effects of isolation, handling, and novelty on the pituitary-adrenal response in the mouse. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 7, 217-221.
24. Newcomb, M. D., & McGee, L. (1991). Influence of sensation seeking on general deviance and specific problem behavior from adolescence to young adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 614-628.
25. Nicholls, B., Springham, A., & Mellanby, J. (1992). The playground maze: A new method for measuring directed exploration in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 43, 171-180.
26. Piazza, P. V., Deminiere, J. M., Le Moal, M., & Simon, H. (1989). Factors that predict individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration. Science, 245, 1511-1513.
27. Piazza, P. V., Deminiere, J. M., Maccari, S., Le Moal, M., Mormede, P., & Simon, H. (1991). Individual vulnerability to drug self-administration: Action of corticosterone on dopaminergic systems as a possible pathophysiological mechanism. In P. Willner & J. Scheel-Kruger (Eds.), The mesolimbic dopamine system: From motivation to action (pp. 473-495). New York: Wiley.
28. Piazza, P. V., Deroche-Gamonent, V., Rouge-Pont, F., & Le Moal, M. (2000). Vertical shifts in self-administration dose-response function predict a drug-vulnerable phenotype predisposed to addiction. Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 4226-4232.
29. Pierre, P. J., & Vezina, P. (1997). Predisposition to self-administration amphetamine: The contribution of response to novelty and prior exposure to the drug. Psychopharmacology, 129, 277-284.
30. Roberti, J. W. (2004). A review of behavioral and biological correlates of sensation seeking. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 259-279.
31. Robinet, P. M., Rowlett, J. K., & Bardo, M. T. (1998). Individual differences in novelty-induced activity and the rewarding effects of novelty and amphetamine in rats. Behavioral Proceedings, 44, 1-9.
32. Tabachnick, B. J., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
33. Wills, T. A., Vaccaro, D., & McNamara, G. (1994). Novelty seeking, risk taking, and related constructs as predictors of adolescent substance abuse: An application of Cloninger's theory. Journal of Substance Abuse, 6, 1-20.
34. Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press.