Comparison of bacterial culture and real-time PCR for the detection of Salmonella in grow-finish pigs in western canada using a bayesian approach

Zoonoses and Public Health

Volumn 57, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2010, Pages 115-120

  Wilkins, W ^a   Waldner, C ^a   Rajic A ^b,c   McFall, M ^d   Muckle, A ^e   Mainar Jaime, R C ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^b PUBLIC HEALTH AGENCY OF CANADA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^d ALBERTA AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND   (Canada)

^f Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón IA2   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bayesian; Culture; Diagnostic accuracy; PCR; Pigs; Salmonella; Swine

Indexed keywords

AGAR MEDIUM; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BACTERIUM DETECTION; BAYESIAN LEARNING; CANADA; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENRICHMENT CULTURE; FECES CULTURE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SALMONELLA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEROTYPING; SWINE;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CANADA; COST SAVINGS; FECES; FOOD MICROBIOLOGY; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS, ANIMAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEROTYPING; SWINE; SWINE DISEASES;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); SALMONELLA; SUIDAE;

EID: 78649606500     PISSN: 18631959     EISSN: 18632378     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01365.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anonymous, 2006: Canadian Integrated Program for Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CIPARS) 2004, Public Health Agency of Canada. Government of Canada, Guelph, ON.
2. Bohaychuk, V. M., G. E. Gensler, M. E. McFall, R. K. King, and D. G. Renter, 2007: A real-time PCR assay for the detection of Salmonella in a wide variety of food and food-animal matrices. J. Food Prot. 70, 1080-1087.
3. Branscum, A.J., I. A. Gardner, and W. O. Johnson, 2005: Estimation of diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity through Bayesian modeling. Prev. Vet. Med. 68, 145-163.
4. Croci, L., E. Delibato, G. Volpe, D. De Medici, and G. Palleschi, 2004: Comparison of PCR, electrochemical enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and the standard culture method for detecting Salmonella in meat products. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 1393-1396.
5. Enoe, C., M. P. Georgiadis, and W.O. Johnson, 2000: Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests and disease prevalence when the true disease state is unknown. Prev. Vet. Med. 45, 61-81.
6. Farzan, A., R. M. Friendship, C. E. Dewey, K. Warriner, C. Poppe, and K. Klotins, 2006: Prevalence of Salmonella spp. on Canadian pig farms using liquid or dry-feeding. Prev. Vet. Med. 73, 241-254.
7. Gelman, A., and D. B. Rubin, 1992: Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat. Sci. 7, 457-472.
8. Georgiadis, M. P., W. O. Johnson, I. A. Gardner, and R. Singh, 2003: Correlation-adjusted estimation of sensitivity and specificity of two diagnostic tests. J. Royal Stat. Soc. C 52, 63-76.
9. Gray, J. T., P. J. Fedorka-Cray, T. J. Stabel, and M. R. Ackermann, 1995: Influence of inoculation route on the carrier state of Salmonella choleraesuis in swine. Vet. Microbiol. 47, 43-59.
10. Greiner, M., and I. A. Gardner, 2000: Epidemiologic issues in the validation of veterinary diagnostic tests. Prev. Vet. Med. 45, 3-22.
11. Hui, S. L., and X. H. Zhou, 1998: Evaluation of diagnostic tests without gold standards. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 7, 354-370.
12. Lofstrom, C., M. Krause, M. H. Josefsen, F. Hansen, and J. Hoorfar, 2009: Validation of a same-day real-time PCR method for screening of meat and carcass swabs for Salmonella. BMC Microbiol. 9, 85.
13. Mainar-Jaime, R. C., N. Atashparvar, M. Chirino-Trejo, and J. M. Blasco, 2008: Accuracy of two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of antibodies to Salmonella spp. in slaughter pigs from Canada. Prev. Vet. Med. 85, 41-51.
14. Mejia, W., J. Casal, D. Zapata, G. J. Sanchez, M. Martin, and E. Mateu, 2006: Epidemiology of Salmonella infections in pig units and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the strains of Salmonella species isolated. Vet. Rec. 159, 271-276.
15. Patel, J. R., and A. A. Bhagwat, 2008: Rapid real-time PCR assay for detecting Salmonella in raw and ready-to-eat meats. Acta Vet. Hung. 56, 451-458.
16. Rajić, A., J. Keenliside, M. E. McFall, A. E. Deckert, A. C. Muckle, B. P. O'Connor, K. Manninen, C. E. Dewey, and S. A. McEwen, 2005: Longitudinal study of Salmonella species in 90 Alberta swine finishing farms. Vet. Microbiol. 105, 47-56.
17. Schwartz, K. J., 1999: Salmonellosis. In: Straw, B. E., S. D'Allaire, W. L. Mengeling, and D. J. Tayolor (eds), Diseases of Swine, pp. 535-551. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA, USA.
18. Sibley, J., B. Yue, F. Huang, J. Harding, J. Kingdon, M. Chirino-Trejo, and G. D. Appleyard, 2003: Comparison of bacterial enriched-broth culture, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, and broth culture-polymerase chain reaction techniques for identifying asymptomatic infections with Salmonella in swine. Can. J. Vet. Res. 67, 219-222.
19. Wilkins, W., A. Rajic, C. Waldner, M. McFall, E. Chow, A. Muckle, and L. Rosengren, 2010: Distribution of Salmonella serovars in breeding, nursery, and grow-to-finish pigs, and risk factors for shedding in ten farrow-to-finish swine farms in Alberta and Saskatchewan. Can. J. Vet. Res. 74, 81-90.
20. Wood, R. L., and R. Rose, 1992: Populations of Salmonella typhimurium in internal organs of experimentally infected carrier swine. Am. J. Vet. Res. 53, 653-658.