Evaluation of three commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of antibodies against Salmonella spp. in meat juice from finishing pigs in Spain

Zoonoses and Public Health

Volumn 57, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2010, Pages 107-114

  Vico, J P ^a   Engel, B ^b   Buist, W G ^b   Mainar Jaime, R C ^a  

^a Agrifood Institute of Aragón IA2   (Spain)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bacteriology; ELISA; Latent class models; Pig salmonellosis; Serology

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANTIBODY DETECTION; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; HERD; MEAT; MEAT INDUSTRY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEROPREVALENCE; SEROTYPE; SLAUGHTERHOUSE; SPAIN; SWINE;

ABATTOIRS; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; ANTIBODIES, BACTERIAL; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FOOD MICROBIOLOGY; FOOD-PROCESSING INDUSTRY; MEAT; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS, ANIMAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPAIN; SWINE; SWINE DISEASES;

ANIMALIA; SALMONELLA; SUIDAE;

EID: 78649577016     PISSN: 18631959     EISSN: 18632378     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2010.01364.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alban, L., H. Stege, and J. Dahl, 2002: The new classification system for slaughter-pig herds in the Danish Salmonella surveillance-and-control program. Prev. Vet. Med. 53, 133-146.
2. Anonymous, 2007: Report of the task force on zoonoses data collection on a proposal for technical specifications for a baseline survey on the prevalence of Salmonella in breeding pigs. EFSA J. 99, 1-28.
3. Anonymous, 2008a: Scientific opinion of the panel on biological hazards on a request from the European Commission on a quantitative microbiological risk assessment on Salmonella in meat: source attribution for human salmonellosis from meat. EFSA J. 625, 1-32.
4. Anonymous, 2008b: Report of the task force on zoonoses data collection on the analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of Salmonella in slaughter pigs. Part A. EFSA J. 135, 1-111.
5. Creus, E., F. Baucells, and E. Mateu, 2004: Salmonella infection in a multiple-site swine production system in Catalonia. 18th International Pig Veterinary Society Congress, June 27-July 1, Hamburg, Germany.
6. Dohoo, I., W. Martin, and H. Stryhn, 2003: Screening and diagnostic tests. In: McPike, M. (ed.), Veterinary Epidemiology Research, pp. 85-120. Atlantic Veterinary College Inc., Charlottetown, PEI.
7. Engel, B., B. Swildens, A. Stegeman, W. Buist, and M. De Jong, 2006: Estimation of sensitivity and specificity of three conditionally dependent diagnostic tests in the absence of a gold standard. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Sci. 11, 360-380.
8. Engel, B., W. Buist, K. Orsel, A. Dekker, K. De Clerq, S. Grazioli, and H. Van Roermund, 2008: A Bayesian evaluation of 6 diagnostic tests for foot-and mouth disease for vaccinated and non-vaccinated cattle. Prev. Vet. Med. 86, 124-138.
9. Farzan, A., and R. M. Friendship, 2009: Vaccination to control Salmonella shedding and improve growth in pigs. 8th International Symposium on the Epidemiology and Control of Foodborne pathogens in pork, 30 September to 2 October, Québec, Canada, pp. 45-47.
10. Farzan, A., R. M. Friendship, and C. E. Dewey, 2007: Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests and culture for determining Salmonella status of a pig herd. Epidemiol. Infect. 135, 238-244.
11. Funk, J. A., I. T. Harris, and P. R. Davies, 2005: Comparison of fecal culture and Danish Mix-ELISA for determination of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica prevalence in growing swine. Vet. Microbiol. 107, 115-126.
12. Greiner, M., D. Pfeiffer, and R. D. Smith, 2000: Principles and practical application of the receiver-operating characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests. Prev. Vet. Med. 45, 23-41.
13. Van Der Heijden, H. M., 2001: First international ring trial of ELISAs for Salmonella-antibody detection in swine. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 114, 389-392.
14. Hurd, H. S., J. D. McKean, R. D. Griffith, and M. H. Rostagno, 2003: Estimation of the Salmonella enterica prevalence in finishing swine. Epidemiol. Infect. 132, 127-135.
15. International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO), 2002. ISO 6579. Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs. Horizontal Method for the Detection of Salmonella spp. Annex D: Detection of Salmonella spp. in Animal Faeces and in Samples from the Primary Production Stage. Génova, Suiza.
16. Mainar-Jaime, R. C., N. Atashparvar, and M. Chirino-Trejo, 2008a: Estimation of the diagnostic accuracy of the invA-gene-based PCR technique and a bacteriological culture for the detection of Salmonella spp. in caecal content from slaughtered pigs using Bayesian analysis. Zoonoses Public Health 55, 112-118.
17. Mainar-Jaime, R. C., N. Atashparvar, M. Chirino-Trejo, and J. M. Blasco, 2008b: Accuracy of two commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for the detection of antibodies to Salmonella spp. in slaughter pigs from Canada. Prev. Vet. Med. 85, 41-51.
18. Marín, C. M., B. Alonso-Urmeneta, I. Morillón, S. Pérez-Gómez, and J. M. Blasco, 1998: Comparison of polyclonal, monoclonal and protein G peroxidase conjugates in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of Brucella ovis in sheep. Vet. Rec. 143, 390-394.
19. Montesissa, C., 2006: Natural alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters in Europe. J. Vet. Pharmacol. Therap. 29(Suppl. 1), 45-46.
20. Mousing, J., P. T. Jensen, C. Halgaard, F. Bager, N. Feld, B. Nielsen, J. P. Nielsen and S. Bech, 1997: Nation-wide Salmonella enterica surveillance and control in Danish slaughterSwine Herds. Prev. Vet. Med. 29, 247-261.
21. Murray, C. J., 2000: Environmental aspects of Salmonella. In: Wray, C., and A. Wray (eds), Salmonella in Domestic Animals, pp. 265-284. CABI Publishing, New York, USA.
22. Nielsen, B., D. Baggesen, and F. Bager, 1995: The serological response to Salmonella serovars Typhimurium and Infantis in experimentally infected pigs. The time course followed with an indirect anti-LPS ELISA and bacteriological examinations. Vet. Microbiol. 47, 205-218.
23. Nielsen, B., L. Ekeroth, F. Bager, and P. Lind, 1998: Use of muscle fluid as a source of antibodies for serologic detection of Salmonella infection in slaughter pig herds. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest. 10, 158-163.
24. Nollet, N., D. Maes, L. Duchateau, V. Hautekiet, K. Houf, J. Van Hoof, L. De Zuttera, A. De Kruif, and R. Geers, 2005: Discrepancies between the isolation of Salmonella from mesenteric lymph nodes and the results of serological screening in slaughter pigs. Vet. Res. 36, 545-555.
25. Proux, K., C. Houdayer, F. Humbert, R. Cariolet, V. Rose, E. Eveno, and F. Madec, 2000: Development of a complete ELISA using Salmonella lipopolysaccharides of various serogroups allowing to detect all infected pigs. Vet. Res. 31, 481-490.
26. Rostagno, M. H., H. Scott Hurd, and J. D. McKean, 2009: Split marketing as a risk factor for Salmonella enterica infection in swine. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 6, 865-869.
27. Sandberg, M., P. Hopp, J. Jarp, and E. Skjerve, 2002: An evaluation of the Norwegian Salmonella surveillance and control program in live pigs and pork. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 72, 1-11.
28. Sørensen, L. L., L. Alban, B. Nielsen, and J. Dahl, 2004: The correlation between Salmonella serology and isolation of Salmonella in Danish pigs at slaughter. Vet. Microbiol. 101, 131-141.
29. Spiegelhalter, D., A. Thomas, N. Best, and D. Lunn, 2003: WinBUGS User Manual, Version 1.4. Available at:
30. De Vos, C. J., H. W. Saatkamp, and J. Ehlers, 2007: Simulation evaluation of Salmonella monitoring in finishing pigs in Lower Saxony, Germany. Prev. Vet. Med. 82, 123-137.
31. Van Winsen, R. L., M. Swanenburg, J. M. A. Snijders, and H. A. P. Urlings, 1999: Recovery of Salmonella serotypes from swine faecal samples using ISO6579. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Epidemiology and Control of Salmonella in Pork, Washington, DC, 5-7 August, pp. 90-91.