Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) tests and culture for determining Salmonella status of a pig herd

Epidemiology and Infection

Volumn 135, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 238-244

  Farzan, A ^a,b   Friendship, R M ^a   Dewey, C E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL ANTIGEN; BACTERIUM ANTIBODY;

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BACTERIUM DETECTION; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; BLOOD ANALYSIS; CANADA; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CULTURE TECHNIQUE; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FECES ANALYSIS; HERD; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; SALMONELLA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEROTYPE; SWINE;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; AREA UNDER CURVE; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FECES; ONTARIO; SALMONELLA INFECTIONS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWINE; SWINE DISEASES;

EID: 33847269678     PISSN: 09502688     EISSN: 14694409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268806006868     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Berends BR, et al. Impact on human health of Salmonella spp. on pork in The Netherlands and the anticipated effects of some currently proposed control strategies. International Journal of Food Microbiology 1998; 44: 219-229.
2. Borch E, Nesbakken T, Christensen H. Hazard identification in swine slaughter with respect to foodborne bacteria. International Journal of Food Microbiology 1996; 30: 9-25.
3. Nielsen B, Wegener HC. Public health and pork and pork products: regional perspectives of Denmark. Review of Science and Technology 1997; 16: 513-524.
4. Christensen JD, et al. Herd prevalence of Salmonella spp. in Danish pig herds after implementation of the Danish Salmonella Control Program with reference to a pre-implementation study. Veterinary Microbiology 2002; 88: 175-188.
5. Davies PR, et al. Comparison of methods for isolating Salmonella bacteria from faeces of naturally infected pigs. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2000; 89: 169-177.
6. Schwartz KJ. Salmonellosis. In: Straw, BE, D'Allaire S, Mengeling WL, Taylor DJ, eds. Diseases of Swine, 8th edn. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1999, pp. 535-551.
7. van Winsen RL, et al. Monitoring of transmission of Salmonella enterica serovars in pigs using bacterio-logical and serological detection methods. Veterinary Microbiology 2001; 80: 267-274.
8. Kranker S, Alban L, Boes J, Dahl J. Longitudinal study of Salmonella Typhimurium infection in three Danish farrow-to-finish swine herds. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 2282-2288.
9. Nielsen B, et al. The serological response to Salmonella serovars typhimurium and infantis in experimentally infected pigs. The time course followed with an indirect anti-LPS ELISA and bacteriological examinations. Veterinary Microbiology 1995; 47: 205-218.
10. Mousing JP, et al. Nation-wide Salmonella enterica surveillance and control in Danish slaughter swine herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 1997; 29: 247-261.
11. Sorensen LL, et al. The correlation between Salmonella serology and isolation of Salmonella in Danish pigs at slaughter. Veterinary Microbiology 2004; 101: 131-141.
12. Alban L, Stege H, Dahl J. The new classification system for slaughter-pig herds in the Danish Salmonella surveillance-and-control program. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2002; 53: 133-146.
13. Beloeil PA, et al. Impact of the Salmonella status of market-age pigs and the pre-slaughter process on Salmonella caecal contamination at slaughter. Veterinary Research 2004; 35: 513-530.
14. Lo Fo Wong DM, et al. Recovery of Salmonella enterica from seropositive finishing pig herds. Veterinary Microbiology 2003; 97: 201-214.
15. Proux K, et al. Development of a complete ELISA using Salmonella lipopolysaccharides of various serogroups allowing to detect all infected pigs. Veterinary Research 2000; 31: 481-490.
16. Rostagno MH, Hurd HS, Mckean JD. Bacteriological and serological Salmonella prevalence in finishing pigs. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Pig Veterinary Society (IPVS) Congress, 2004; 2: 649.
17. van der Wolf PJ, et al. Salmonella seroprevalence at the population and herd level in pigs in The Netherlands. Veterinary Microbiology 2001; 80: 171-184.
18. Blaha T. The present state of the German QS Salmonella monitoring and reduction programme. Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift 2004; 8: 324-326.
19. Leontides LS, Grafanakis E, Genigeorgis C. Factors associated with the serological prevalence of Salmonella enterica in Greek finishing swineherds. Epidemiology and Infection 2003; 131: 599-606.
20. Lo Fo Wong DMA, et al. Herd-level risk factors for subclinical Salmonella infection in European finishing-pig herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2004; 62: 253-266.
21. van der Heijden HM. First international ring trial of ELISAs for Salmonella-antibody detection in swine. Berliner und Munchener Tierarztliche Wochenschrift (Berlin) 2001; 114: 389-392.
22. Dohoo I, Wayne M, Stryhn H. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research. Canada: AVC Inc., University of Prince Edward Island, 2003, pp. 85-120.
23. Jordan D, McEwen SA. Herd-level test performance based on uncertain estimates of individual test performance, individual true prevalence and herd true prevalence. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 1998; 36: 187-209.
24. van der Wolf PJ, et al. Salmonella infections in finishing pigs in The Netherlands: Bacteriological herd prevalence, serogroup and antibiotic resistance of isolates and risk factors for infection. Veterinary Microbiology 1999; 67: 263-275.
25. Davies PR, et al. Observational evidence for differential translocation of Salmonella serovars to mesenteric lymph nodes of swine. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Pig Veterinary Society (IPVS) Congress, 2004; 2: 652.