Docking validation resources: Protein family and ligand flexibility experiments

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 50, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1986-2000

  Mukherjee, Sudipto ^a   Balius, Trent E ^a   Rizzo, Robert C ^a,b  

^a Stony Brook University   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBONIC ANHYDRASE;

COMMUNITY RESOURCES; FLEXIBLE LIGANDS; LIGAND-RECEPTOR COMPLEX; RAPID IDENTIFICATION; SITE ENVIRONMENTS; STRONG DEPENDENCES; VALIDATION RESOURCES; VIRTUAL SCREENING;

LIGANDS;

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; INTERNET; METABOLISM; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; REPRODUCIBILITY;

BINDING SITES; INTERNET; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 78649505687     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci1001982     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Kuntz, I. D.; Blaney, J. M.; Oatley, S. J.; Langridge, R.; Ferrin, T. E. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions J. Mol. Biol. 1982, 161, 269-288
2. Goodsell, D. S.; Morris, G. M.; Olson, A. J. Automated docking of flexible ligands: Applications of AutoDock J. Mol. Recognit. 1996, 9, 1-5
3. Ewing, T. J.; Makino, S.; Skillman, A. G.; Kuntz, I. D. DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2001, 15, 411-428
4. Moustakas, D. T.; Therese Lang, P. T.; Pegg, S.; Pettersen, E.; Kuntz, I. D.; Broojimans, N.; Rizzo, R. C. Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5 J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2006, 20, 601-619
5. Lang, P. T.; Brozell, S. R.; Mukherjee, S.; Pettersen, E. F.; Meng, E. C.; Thomas, V.; Rizzo, R. C.; Case, D. A.; James, T. L.; Kuntz, I. D. DOCK 6: Combining techniques to model RNA-small molecule complexes RNA 2009, 15, 1219-1230
6. Kramer, B.; Rarey, M.; Lengauer, T. Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein-ligand docking Proteins 1999, 37, 228-241
7. McGann, M. R.; Almond, H. R.; Nicholls, A.; Grant, J. A.; Brown, F. K. Gaussian docking functions Biopolymers 2003, 68, 76-90
8. Friesner, R. A.; Banks, J. L.; Murphy, R. B.; Halgren, T. A.; Klicic, J. J.; Mainz, D. T.; Repasky, M. P.; Knoll, E. H.; Shelley, M.; Perry, J. K.; Shaw, D. E.; Francis, P.; Shenkin, P. S. Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1739-1749
9. Halgren, T. A.; Murphy, R. B.; Friesner, R. A.; Beard, H. S.; Frye, L. L.; Pollard, W. T.; Banks, J. L. Glide: A new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 2. Enrichment factors in database screening J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 1750-1759
10. Verdonk, M. L.; Cole, J. C.; Hartshorn, M. J.; Murray, C. W.; Taylor, R. D. Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 2003, 52, 609-623
11. Kuntz, I. D. Structure-based strategies for drug design and discovery Science 1992, 257, 1078-1082
12. Hardy, L. W.; Malikayil, A. The impact of structure-guided drug design on clinical agents Curr. Drug Discov. 2003, 15-20
13. Jorgensen, W. L. The many roles of computation in drug discovery Science 2004, 303, 1813-1818
14. Klebe, G. Virtual ligand screening: Strategies, perspectives and limitations Drug Discovery Today 2006, 11, 580-594
15. Shoichet, B. K. Virtual screening of chemical libraries Nature 2004, 432, 862-865
16. Jain, A. Bias, reporting, and sharing: Computational evaluations of docking methods J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 201-212
17. Irwin, J. Community benchmarks for virtual screening J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 193-199
18. Jain, A.; Nicholls, A. Recommendations for evaluation of computational methods J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 133-139
19. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28, 235-242
20. Hartshorn, M. J.; Verdonk, M. L.; Chessari, G.; Brewerton, S. C.; Mooij, W. T. M.; Mortenson, P. N.; Murray, C. W. Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein-ligand docking performance J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 726-741
21. Irwin, J. J.; Shoichet, B. K.; Mysinger, M. M.; Huang, N.; Colizzi, F.; Wassam, P.; Cao, Y. Automated docking screens: A feasibility study J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 5712-5720
22. Hu, L. G.; Benson, M. L.; Smith, R. D.; Lerner, M. G.; Carlson, H. A. Binding MOAD (Mother of All Databases) Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinf. 2005, 60, 333-340
23. Wang, R.; Fang, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. The PDBbind database: Collection of binding affinities for protein-ligand complexes with known three-dimensional structures J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 2977-2980
24. Wang, R.; Fang, X.; Lu, Y.; Yang, C. Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, R.; Fang, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. The PDBbind database: Methodologies and updates J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4111-4119
25. Liu, T.; Lin, Y.; Wen, X.; Jorissen, R. N.; Gilson, M. K. BindingDB: A Web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein-ligand binding affinities Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35, D198-D201
26. Roche, O.; Kiyama, R.; Brooks, C. L. Ligand-protein database: Linking protein-ligand complex structures to binding data J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 3592-3598
27. Knegtel, R. M.; Kuntz, I. D.; Oshiro, C. M. Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 266, 424-440
28. Sandak, B.; Wolfson, H. J.; Nussinov, R. Flexible docking allowing induced fit in proteins: Insights from an open to closed conformational isomers Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 1998, 32, 159-174
29. Cavasotto, C. N.; Abagyan, R. A. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 337, 209-225
30. Sherman, W.; Day, T.; Jacobson, M. P.; Friesner, R. A.; Farid, R. Novel procedure for modeling ligand/receptor induced fit effects J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 534-553
31. Moitessier, N.; Therrien, E.; Hanessian, S. A method for induced-fit docking, scoring, and ranking of flexible ligands. Application to peptidic and pseudopeptidic beta-secretase (BACE 1) inhibitors J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5885-5894
32. Amaro, R. E.; Baron, R.; McCammon, J. A. An improved relaxed complex scheme for receptor flexibility in computer-aided drug design J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22, 693-705
33. Ferrari, A. M.; Wei, B. Q. Q.; Costantino, L.; Shoichet, B. K. Soft docking and multiple receptor conformations in virtual screening J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 5076-5084
34. Kearsley, S. K.; Underwood, D. J.; Sheridan, R. P.; Miller, M. D. Flexibases: A way to enhance the use of molecular docking methods J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1994, 8, 565-582
35. MOE; Chemical Computing Group: Montreal, Canada, 2008.
36. Gasteiger, J.; Marsili, M. Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativityî - ̧A rapid access to atomic charges Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 3219-3228
37. Jakalian, A.; Bush, B. L.; Jack, D. B.; Bayly, C. I. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: I. Method J. Comput. Chem. 2000, 21, 132-146
38. Jakalian, A.; Jack, D. B.; Bayly, C. I. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation J. Comput. Chem. 2002, 23, 1623-1641
39. Case, D. A.; Cheatham, T. E.; Darden, T.; Gohlke, H.; Luo, R., Jr.; M. K. M.; Onufriev, A.; Simmerling, C.; Wang, B.; Woods, R. J. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1668-1688
40. Amber8; University of California: San Francisco, CA, 2004.
41. DMS; UCSF Computer Graphics Laboratory: San Francisco, CA, http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/Overview/software.html (accessed May 04th 2010).
42. DesJarlais, R. L.; Sheridan, R. P.; Seibel, G. L.; Dixon, J. S.; Kuntz, I. D.; Venkataraghavan, R. Using shape complementarity as an initial screen in designing ligands for a receptor binding site of known three-dimensional structure J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 722-729
43. Meng, E. C.; Shoichet, B. K.; Kuntz, I. D. Automated docking with grid-based energy evaluation J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 505-524
44. Pettersen, E. F.; Goddard, T. D.; Huang, C. C.; Couch, G. S.; Greenblatt, D. M.; Meng, E. C.; Ferrin, T. E. UCSF Chimeraî - ̧A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1605-1612
45. Wang, J.; Wolf, R. M.; Caldwell, J. W.; Kollman, P. A.; Case, D. A. Development and testing of a general amber force field J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1157-1174
46. Halgren, T. A. Merck molecular force field 0.1. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94 J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 490-519
47. Halgren, T. A. MMFF VI. MMFF94s option for energy minimization studies J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20, 720-729
48. Dewar, M. J. S.; Zoebisch, E. G.; Healy, E. F.; Stewart, J. J. P. The development and use of quantum-mechanical molecular-models. 76. Am1î - ̧A new general-purpose quantum-mechanical molecular-model J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 3902-3909
49. Stewart, J. J. P. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods. 1. Method J. Comput. Chem. 1989, 10, 209-220
50. Gaussian 98, revision A.9; Gaussian Inc.: Pittsburgh PA, 1998.
51. Hakansson, K.; Carlsson, M.; Svensson, L. A.; Liljas, A. Structure of native and apo carbonic anhydrase II and structure of some of its anion-ligand complexes J. Mol. Biol. 1992, 227, 1192-1204
52. von Itzstein, M.; Wu, W. Y.; Kok, G. B.; Pegg, M. S.; Dyason, J. C.; Jin, B.; Van Phan, T.; Smythe, M. L.; White, H. F.; Oliver, S. W. Rational design of potent sialidase-based inhibitors of influenza virus replication Nature 1993, 363, 418-423
53. Drugs@FDA website. http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda/ index.cfm (accessed May 18, 2010).
54. Birch, L.; Murray, C. W.; Hartshorn, M. J.; Tickle, I. J.; Verdonk, M. L. Sensitivity of molecular docking to induced fit effects in influenza virus neuraminidase J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 855-869
55. Chachra, R.; Rizzo, R. C. Origins of resistance conferred by the R292K neuraminidase mutation via molecular dynamics and free energy calculations J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4, 1526-1540
56. Russell, R. J.; Haire, L. F.; Stevens, D. J.; Collins, P. J.; Lin, Y. P.; Blackburn, G. M.; Hay, A. J.; Gamblin, S. J.; Skehel, J. J. The structure of H5N1 avian influenza neuraminidase suggests new opportunities for drug design Nature 2006, 443, 45-49
57. Cheng, L. S.; Amaro, R. E.; Xu, D.; Li, W. W.; Arzberger, P. W.; McCammon, J. A. Ensemble-based virtual screening reveals potential novel antiviral compounds for avian influenza neuraminidase J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 3878-3894