Multifocal visual evoked potential recordings in compressive optic neuropathy secondary to pituitary adenoma

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 121, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 197-204

  Jayaraman, Manju ^a   Ambika, S ^a   Gandhi, Rashmin Anilkumar ^a   Bassi, Shikha Rajesh ^a   Ravi, Priya ^a   Sen, Parveen ^b  

^a MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (India)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Chiasmal compression; Compressive optic neuropathy; Multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP); Pituitary adenoma; Standard automated perimetry (SAP)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPOPHYSIS ADENOMA; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT;

ADENOMA; ADULT; AUTOMATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE COMPRESSION SYNDROMES; OPTIC CHIASM; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PITUITARY NEOPLASMS; REACTION TIME; VISUAL FIELD TESTS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 78649334043     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-010-9246-x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. S Ezzat SL Asa WT Couldwell CE Barr WE Dodge ML Vance IE McCutcheon 2004 The prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review Cancer 101 613 619 10.1002/cncr.20412 15274075 (Pubitemid 38970613)
2. M Hornyak K Digre WT Couldwell 2009 Neuro-ophthalmological manifestations of benign anterior skull base lesions Postgrad Med 121 103 114 10.3810/pgm.2009.07.2036 19641276
3. GP Van Stavern NJ Newman 2001 Optic neuropathies. An overview Ophthalmol Clin North Am 14 viii 61 71 11370572
4. R Behbehani 2007 Clinical approach to optic neuropathies Clin Ophthalmol 3 233 246
5. S Prasad NJ Volpe LJ Balcer 2010 Approach to optic neuropathies: clinical update Neurologist 16 23 34 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181be6fad 20065793
6. Z Rumboldt 2005 Pituitary adenomas Top Magn Reson Imaging 16 277 288 10.1097/01.rmr.0000224684.76006.cf 16785843 (Pubitemid 44350375)
7. Holder GE (2001) Chiasmal and retrochiasmal lesions. In: Arden GB, Heckenlively JR (eds) Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision, 2nd edn. MIT press, Cambridge, pp 857-865
8. GE Holder 2004 Electrophysiological assessment of optic nerve disease Eye 18 1133 1143 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crmtFOhsQ%3D%3D 10.1038/sj.eye.6701573 15534599 (Pubitemid 39591796)
9. GE Holder RP Gale JF Acheson AG Robson 2009 Electrodiagnostic assessment in optic nerve disease Curr Opin Ophthalmol 22 3 10
10. GE Holder 1978 The effects of chiasmal compression on the pattern visual evoked potential Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 45 278 280 1:STN:280:DyaE1c3hsVCqsA%3D%3D 10.1016/0013-4694(78)90011-1 78837 (Pubitemid 8385153)
11. AM Halliday E Halliday A Kriss WI McDonald J Mushin 1976 The pattern evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways Brain 99 357 374 1:STN:280:DyaE2s%2Fks1Ggsw%3D%3D 10.1093/brain/99.2.357 990902
12. JG Flanagan GFA Harding 1987 Multi-channel visual evoked potentials in early compressive lesions of the optic chiasm Doc Ophthalmol 69 271 282 10.1007/BF00154408
13. L Semela EB Yang TR Hedges L Vuong JG Odel DC Hood 2007 Multifocal visual-evoked potential in unilateral compressive optic neuropathy Br J Ophthalmol 91 445 448 10.1136/bjo.2006.097980 17077118 (Pubitemid 46623674)
14. L Semela TR Hedges L Vuong 2007 Serial multifocal visual Evoked potential recordings in compressive optic neuropathy Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 38 250 253 17552396 (Pubitemid 46953796)
15. HA Baseler EE Sutter SA Klein T Carney 1994 The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 90 65 81 1:STN:280:DyaK2c7lsFOmsA%3D%3D 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90114- 7 7509275 (Pubitemid 24057710)
16. DC Hood VC Greenstein 2003 Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma Prog Retin Eye Res 22 201 251 10.1016/S1350-9462(02)00061-7 12604058 (Pubitemid 36246533)
17. DC Hood JG Odel BJ Winn 2003 The multifocal visual evoked potential J Neurophthalmol 23 279 289
18. DC Hood 2004 Electrophysiologic imaging of retinal and optic nerve damage: the multifocal technique Ophthalmol Clin North Am 17 69 88 10.1016/S0896-1549(03)00101-9 15102514 (Pubitemid 38507702)
19. HH Chan FY Ng PH Chu 2005 Clinical application of mfERG/VEP in assessing superior altitudinal hemifield loss Clin Exp Optom 88 253 257 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2005.tb06704.x 16083420
20. W Seiple K Holopigian C Clemens VC Greenstein DC Hood 2005 The multifocal visual evoked potential: an objective measure of visual fields? Vision Res 45 1155 1163 10.1016/j.visres.2004.11.010 15707924 (Pubitemid 40222393)
21. S Hasegawa H Abe 2001 Mapping of glaucomatous visual field defects by multifocal VEPs Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42 3341 3348 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3MnotVGisA%3D%3D 11726643
22. I Goldberg SL Graham AI Klistorner 2002 Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of the glaucomatous visual field loss Am J Ophthalmol 133 29 39 10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01294-6 11755837 (Pubitemid 34076501)
23. JV Odom M Bach C Barber M Brigell MF Marmor AP Tormene GE Holder Vaegan 2004 Visual evoked potentials Doc Ophthalmol 108 115 123 10.1023/B:DOOP. 0000036790.67234.22 15455794 (Pubitemid 39140119)
24. DC Hood X Zhang JE Hong CS Chen 2002 Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording Doc Ophthalmol 104 303 320 10.1023/A:1015235617673 12076018 (Pubitemid 34575363)
25. B Fortune X Zhang DC Hood S Demirel CA Johnson 2004 Normative ranges and specificity of the Multifocal VEP Doc Ophthalmol 109 87 100 10.1007/s10633-004- 3300-5 15675203 (Pubitemid 40012057)
26. X Zhang DC Hood CS Chen JE Hong 2002 A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: an objective definition for poor records Doc Ophthalmol 104 287 302 10.1023/A:1015220501743 12076017 (Pubitemid 34575362)
27. DC Hood X Zhang BJ Winn 2003 Detecting glaucomatous damage with multifocal visual evoked potentials: how can a monocular test work? J Glaucoma 12 3 15 10.1097/00061198-200302000-00002 12567104 (Pubitemid 36228048)
28. DC Hood X Zhang VC Greenstein S Kangovi JG Odel JM Liebmann R Ritch 2000 An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 1580 1587 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3ls1GgtQ%3D%3D 10798679
29. DC Hood N Ohri EB Yang C Rodarte X Zhang B Fortune CA Johnson 2004 Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: a monocular analysis Doc Ophthalmol 109 189 199 10.1007/s10633-004-5512-0 15881265 (Pubitemid 40468413)
30. EB Yang DC Hood C Rodarte X Zhang JG Odel MM Behrens 2007 Improvement in conduction velocity after optic neuritis measured with the multifocal VEP Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48 692 698 10.1167/iovs.06-0475 17251467 (Pubitemid 351260702)
31. DC Hood VC Greenstein JG Odel X Zhang R Ritch JM Leibmann JE Hong CS Chen P Thienprasiddhi 2002 Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials Arch Ophthalmol 120 1672 1681 12470141
32. B Fortune S Demirel X Zhang DC Hood E Patterson A Jamil SL Mansberger GA Cioffi CA Johnson 2007 Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 48 1173 1180 10.1167/iovs.06-0561 17325161 (Pubitemid 351261412)
33. DC Hood X Zhang 2000 Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes Doc Ophthalmol 100 115 137 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FptVWjsg%3D%3D 10.1023/A:1002727602212
34. K Watanabe K Shinoda I Kimura Y Mashima Y Oguchi H Ohde 2007 Discordance between subjective perimetric visual fields and objective multifocal visual evoked potential-determined visual fields in patients with hemianopia Am J Ophthalmol 143 295 304 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.10.042 17184719 (Pubitemid 46136176)
35. TR Hedges III ML Quireza 2004 Multifocal visual evoked potential, multifocal electroretinography, and optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of subclinical loss of vision Ophthalmol Clin North Am 17 89 105 10.1016/S0896-1549(03)00104-4 15102515 (Pubitemid 38507703)
36. AI Klistorner SL Graham J Grigg C Balachandran 2005 Objective perimetry using the multifocal visual evoked potential in central visual pathway lesions Br J Ophthalmol 89 739 744 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M3nvVGmsw%3D%3D 10.1136/bjo.2004. 053223 15923511 (Pubitemid 40780583)
37. Y Betsuin Y Mashima H Ohde R Inoue Y Oguchi 2001 Clinical application of the multifocal VEPs Curr Eye Res 22 54 63 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzjtlSmtQ%3D%3D 10.1076/ceyr.22.1.54.6982 11402379 (Pubitemid 32679492)
38. H Danesh-Meyer SC Caroll BJ Gaskin A Gao GD Gamble 2006 Correlation of the multifocal visual evoked potential and standard automated perimetry in compressive optic neuropathies Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47 1458 1463 10.1167/iovs.05-1146 16565379 (Pubitemid 46780752)
39. AI Klistorner SL Graham J Grigg FA Billson 1998 Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39 937 950 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3jvFSktA%3D%3D 9579473
40. N Pakrou R Casson A Kaines D Selva 2006 Multifocal objective perimetry compared with Humphrey full-threshold perimetry in patients with optic neuritis Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 34 562 567 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2006.01277.x 16925704
41. SL Graham AI Klistorner I Goldberg 2005 Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice Arch Ophthalmol 123 729 739 10.1001/archopht.123.6.729 15955974 (Pubitemid 41056594)
42. C Balachandran SL Graham A Klistorner I Goldberg 2006 Comparison of objective diagnostic tests in glaucoma heidelberg retinal tomography and multifocal visual evoked potentials J Glaucoma 15 110 116 1:STN:280: DC%2BD283isVGkuw%3D%3D 10.1097/00061198-200604000-00006 16633223
43. DC Hood P Thienprasiddhi VC Greenstein BJ Winn N Ohri JM Liebmann R Ritch 2004 Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45 492 498 10.1167/iovs.03-0602 14744890 (Pubitemid 38140506)