Correlation of the multifocal visual evoked potential and standard automated perimetry in compressive optic neuropathies

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1458-1463

  Danesh Meyer, Helen V ^a   Carroll, Stuart C ^a   Gaskin, Brent J ^a   Gao, Angela ^a   Gamble, Greg D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE EXAMINATION; HUMAN; OPTIC CHIASM; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; VISUAL FIELD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE COMPRESSION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY;

EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE COMPRESSION SYNDROMES; OPTIC CHIASM; OPTIC NERVE DISEASES; PERIMETRY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 33645996411     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1146     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Cox TA, Thompson HS, Hayreh SS, Snyder JE. Visual evoked potential and pupillary signs: a comparison in optic nerve disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:1603-1607.
2. Scholl GB, Song HS, Winkler DE, Wray SH. The pattern visual evoked potential and pattern electroretinogram in drusen-associated optic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992;110:75-81.
3. Biersdorff WR, Bell RA, Beck RW. Pattern visual evoked potentials in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Doc Ophthalmol. 1992;80:51-61.
4. Weinstein GW, Odom JV, Cavender S. Visually evoked potentials and electroretinography in neurologic evaluation. Rev Neurol Clin. 1991;9:225-242.
5. Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, Carney T. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;90:65-81.
6. Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg JR, et al. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:937-950.
7. Goldberg I, Graham SL, Klistorner AI. Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002;133:29-39.
8. Klistorner A, Graham SL. Objective perimetry in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:2283-2299.
9. Hood DC, Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein et al. Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45: 492-498.
10. Bengtsson B. Evaulation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2002;80:620-626.
11. Hasegawa S, Abe H. Mapping of glaucomatous visual field defects by multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:3341-3348.
12. Hood DC, Odel JG, Zhang X. Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: a multifocal VEP study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:4032-4038.
13. Klistorner AI, Graham SL, Grigg J, C Balachandran. Objective perimetry using the multifocal visual evoked potential in central visual pathway lesions. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89: 739-744.
14. Gott OS, Weiss MH, Apuzzo M, Van Der Meulen JP. Checkerboard visual evoked response in evaluation and management of pituitary tumors. Neurosurgery. 1979;5:553-558.
15. Maitland CG, Aminoff MJ, Kennard C, Hoyt WF. Evoked potentials in the evaluation of visual field defects due to chiasmal or retrochiasmal lesions. Neurology. 1982;32:986-991.
16. Brecelj J. Electrodiagnositics of chiasmal compressive lesions. Int J Pyschophysiol. 1994;16:263-272.
17. Katz J, Zeger S, Liang KY. Appropriate statistical methods to account for similarities in binary outcomes between fellow eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;33:2461-2465.
18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159-174.
19. Wall M, Neahring RK, Woodward KR. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1277-1283.
20. Thienprasiddhi P, Greenstein VC, Chen CS, et al. Multifocal VEP responses in glaucoma patients with unilateral hemifield defects. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:34-40.
21. Hood DC, Zhang X, Greenstein VC, et al. An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41: 1580-1587.
22. Graham SL, Klistorner AI, Goldberg I. Clinical application of objective perimetry using multifocal visual evoked potentials in glaucoma practice. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:729-739.
23. Bjerre A, Grigg JR, Parry NRA, Henson DB. Test-retest variability of multifocal visual evoked potential and SITA standard perimetry in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:4035-4040.
24. Seiple W, Holopigian K, Clemens C, Greenstein VC, Hood DC. The multifocal visual evoked potential: an objective measure of visual fields? Vision Res. 2005;45:1155-1163.
25. Klistorner AI, Graham SL. Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: effect on intersubject amplitude variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:2145-2152.
26. Hood DC, Greenstein VC, Odel JG, et al. Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials: evidence of a linear relationship. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120:1672-1681.
27. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma, III: quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:135-146.
28. Quigley HA, Dunkelberger GR, Green WR. Retinal ganglion ell atrophy correlated with automated perimetry in human eyes with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:453-464.
29. Kerrigan-Baumrind LA, Quigley HA, Pease ME, Kerrigan DF, Mitchell RS. The number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared to threshold visual field tests in the same persons. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:741-748.
30. Whitehouse GM. The effect of cataract on AccuMap multifocal objective perimetry. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136:209-212.
31. Hood DC, Greenstein VC. Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2003;22:201-251.