Determining abnormal latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials: A monocular analysis

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 109, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 189-199

  Hood, Donald C ^a   Ohri, Nitin ^a   Yang, Bo E ^a   Rodarte, Christopher ^a   Zhang, Xian ^a   Fortune, Brad ^b   Johnson, Chris A ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Electrophysiology; Latency; Multifocal visual evoked potential; VEP

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTRODE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE FUNDUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MONOCULAR VISION; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OPHTHALMOSCOPY; OPTIC NERVE DISEASE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD;

ACUTE DISEASE; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; HUMANS; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; OPTIC NEURITIS; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 16344396310     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-004-5512-0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. D Regan 1989 Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine. Elsevier New York
2. Brigell MG. The visual evoked potential. In: Fishman GA, Birch DG, et al, eds. Electrophysiological testing in disorders of the retina, optic nerve, and visual pathway. San Francisco: American Academy of Ophthalmology, 2001: 237-79.
3. DC Hood X Zhang JE Hong CS Chen 2002 Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording. Doc Ophthalmol 104 303-20
4. Shimada Y, Horiguchi M, Nakamura A. Spatial and temporal properties of interocular timing differences in multifocal visual evoked potential. Vis Res 2004; in press.
5. DC Hood X Zhang C Rodarte EB Yang N Ohri B Fortune CA Johnson 2004 Determining abnormal interocular latencies of multifocal visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 109 177-187
6. DC Hood JG Odel X Zhang 2000 Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: A multifocal VEP study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 4032-8
7. Kardon RH, Givre SJ, Wall M, Hood D. Comparison of threshold and multifocal-VEP perimetry in recovered optic neuritis. In Wall M, Mills RP eds. Perimetry Update 2000/2001: Proceedings of the XVIIth International Perimetric Society Meeting Sept. 6-9, 2000. pp. 19-28. Kugler Publications, New York, NY.
8. Klistorner AI, Balachandran C, Graham SL, Billson F. Multifocal VEP latency in glaucoma [abstract]. Annual Meeting Abstract and Program Planner [on CD-ROM]. Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. Abstract 2165.
9. C Balachandran AI Klistorner SL Graham 2003 Effect of stimulus check size on multifocal visual evoked potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 106 183-88
10. Balachandran C, Klistorner AI, Billson F. Multifocal VEP in children: its maturation and clinical application. Brit J Opthalmol 88: 223-32.
11. Fortune B, Zhang X, Hood DC, Demirel S, Johnson CA. Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP. Doc Ophthalmol. In press.
12. DC Hood VC Greenstein 2003 Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 22 201-51
13. X Zhang DC Hood CS Chen JE Hong 2002 A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: An objective definition for poor records. Doc Ophthalmol. 104 287-302
14. DC Hood X Zhang BJ Winn 2003 Detecting glaucomatous damage with the mfVEP: How can a monocular test work? J Glaucoma 12 3-15
15. HA Baseler EE Sutter SA Klein T Carney 1994 The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 90 65-81 10.1016/0013-4694(94)90114-7 1:STN:280:ByuC2MrnsFY%3D 7509275
16. AI Klistorner SL Graham JR Grigg FA Billson 1998 Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: Improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39 937-50
17. DC Hood X Zhang VC Greenstein S Kangovi JG Odel JM Liebmann R Ritch 2000 An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: A possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41 1580-7
18. B Fortune DC Hood 2003 Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 1364-75
19. I Goldberg SL Graham AI Klistorner 2002 Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 133 29-39
20. T Allison AL Hume CC Wood WR Goff 1984 Deveopmental and aging changes in somatosensory, auditory and visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysio 58 14-24
21. GG Celesia D Kaufman S Cone 1987 Effects of age and sex on pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 68 161-71
22. N-S Chu 1987 Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials: Latency changes with gender and age. Clin Electroencephalogr 18 159-62
23. KW Mitchell JW Howe SR Spencer 1987 Visual evoked potentials in the older population: Age and gender effects. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 8 317-24
24. S Tobimatsu S Kurita-Tashima M Nakayama-Hiromatsu K Akazawa M Kato 1993 Age-related changes in pattern visual evoked potentials: Differential effects of luminance, contrast and check size. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophy 88 12-9
25. X Zhang DC Hood 2004 A principle component analysis of multifocal pattern reversal VEP. J Vis 4 32-43
26. Zhang X, Hood DC. Increasing the sensitivity of the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) technique: Incorporating information from higher order kernels using a principal component analysis method. Doc Ophthalmol 2004, in press.