An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: A possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 1580-1587

  Hood, Donald C ^a   Zhang, Xian ^a   Greenstein, Vivienne C ^b   Kangovi, Shreya ^a   Odel, Jeffrey G ^c   Liebmann, Jeffrey M ^d   Ritch, Robert ^d  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

^d New York Hye and Ear Infirmary   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE; OPTIC NERVE LESION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, OPHTHALMOLOGICAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; OPTIC NERVE; OPTIC NEURITIS; OPTIC NEUROPATHY, ISCHEMIC; RETINAL GANGLION CELLS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0034069303     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abe H, Iwata K. Checkerboard pattern reversal VER in the assessment of glaucomatous field defects. Acta Soc Ophthal Jpn. 1976; 80:829-841.
2. Bobak P, Bodis-Wollner I, Harnois C, et al. Pattern electroretinograms and visual-evoked potentials in glaucoma and multiple sclerosis. Am J Ophthalmol. 1983;96:72-83.
3. Chappin JM, Nissim S. Visual evoked responses in the assessment of field defects in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1975;93:9-18.
4. Howe JW, Mitchell KW. Visual evoked cortical potentials in patients with glaucoma and suspected glaucoma. Res Clin Forums. 1982;4:41-53.
5. Towle V, Moskowitz A, Sokol S, et al. The visual evoked potential in glaucoma and ocular hypertension: effects of check size, field size, and stimulation rate Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1983;24: 175-183.
6. Regan D, Spekreijse H. Evoked potentials in vision research 1961-1986. Vision Res. 1986;26:1461-1480.
7. Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, Carney T. The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;90:65-81.
8. Sutter EE. The fast m-transform: a fast computation of cross-correlations with binary m-sequences. Soc Ind Appl Math. 1991;20: 686-694.
9. Sutter EE, Tran D. The field topography of ERG components in man, I: the photopic luminance response. Vision Res. 1992;32: 433-466.
10. Klistorner Al, Graham SL, Grigg JR, Billson FA. Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:937-950.
11. Brindley GS. The variability of the human striate cortex. Proc Physiol Soc. 1972;225:1P-3P.
12. Stensaas SS, Eddington DK, Dobelle WH. The topography and variability of the primary visual cortex in man. J Neurosurg. 1974; 40:747-755.
13. Steinmetz H, Gunter F, Bernd-Ulrich M. Craniocerebral topography within the international 10-20 system. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol. 1989;72:499-506.
14. Hood DC, Seiple W, Holopigian K, Greenstein V. A comparison of the components of the multi-focal and full-field ERGs. Vis Neurosci. 1997;314:533-544.
15. Baseler HA, Sutler EE. M and P components of the VEP and their visual field distribution. Vision Res. 1997;37:675-690.
16. Yu M, Brown B. Variation of topographic visually evoked potentials across the visual field. Ophthalmol Physiol Opt. 1997;17:25-31.
17. Graham SL, Klistorner Al, GriggJR, Billson FA. Objective perimetry in glaucoma-improving signals with multi-channel multi-focal pattern VEP [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(4): S67. Abstract nr 358.
18. Sutter EE, Bearse MA. The optic nerve head component of the human ERG. Vision Res. 1999;39:419-436.
19. Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma, III: quantitalive correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:135-146.
20. Hood DC, Holopigian K, Seiple W, et al. Assessment of local retinal function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa using the multi-focal ERG technique. Vision Res. 1998;38:163-180.
21. Johnson CA, Spry PGD. Normal age-relaled sensitivity loss for perimetry tests that evaluate a variety of different visual functions [ARVO Abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(4):S67.
22. Brenton RS, Phelps CD, Rojas P, Woolson RF. Interocular differences of the visual field in normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986;27:799-805.