Normative ranges and specificity of the multifocal VEP

Documenta Ophthalmologica

Volumn 109, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 87-100

  Fortune, Brad ^a   Zhang, Xian ^b   Hood, Donald C ^b   Demirel, Shaban ^a   Johnson, Chris A ^a  

^a DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Aging; Electrophysiology; Glaucoma; Multifocal visual evoked potential; VEP

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGE; AGED; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; ASIAN; CAUCASIAN; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DEMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HISPANIC; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MONOCULAR VISION; NEGRO; NORMAL HUMAN; PROBABILITY; RACE DIFFERENCE; SELF REPORT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCULAR PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 10944227449     PISSN: 00124486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10633-004-3300-5     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. D Regan 1989 Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine. Elsevier New York
2. MG Brigell 2001 The visual evoked potential Fishman GA Birch DG, et al., eds. Electrophysiological testing in disorders of the retina, optic nerve, and visual pathway American Academy of Ophthalmology San Francisco 237-279
3. EE Sutter 1991 The fast m-transform: Fast computation of cross-correlations with binary m-sequences. SIAM. J Comput. 20: 686-694
4. EE Sutter D Tran 1992 The field topography of ERG components in man - I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res 32: 433-446
5. EE Sutter 2001 Imaging visual function with the multifocal m-sequence technique. Vision Res 41: 1241-1255
6. HA Baseler EE Sutter SA Klein T Carney 1994 The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 90: 65-81
7. AI Klistorner SL Graham JR Grigg FA Billson 1998 Multifocal topographic visual evoked potential: Improving objective detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39: 937-950
8. A Klistorner SL Graham 2000 Objective perimetry in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 107: 2283-2299
9. SL Graham AI Klistorner JR Grigg FA Billson 2000 Objective VEP perimetry in glaucoma: Asymmetry analysis to identify early deficits. J Glaucoma 9 10-19
10. DC Hood X Zhang VC Greenstein S Kangovi JG Odel JM Liebmann R Ritch 2000 An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: A possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41: 1580-1587
11. DC Hood X Zhang 2000 Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes. Doc Ophthalmol 100: 115-137
12. S Hasegawa H Abe 2001 Mapping of glaucomatous visual field defects by multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42: 3341-3348
13. I Goldberg SL Graham AI Klistorner 2002 Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. Am J Ophthalmol 133: 29-39
14. Fortune B, Goh K, Demirel S, Novitsky K, Mansberger SL, Johnson CA, Cioffi GA. Detection of glaucomatous visual field loss using the multifocal visual evoked potential. In: Henson DB, Wall M, eds. Perimetry Update 2002/2003; Proceedings of the XVth International Perimetric Society Meeting. The Hague: Kugler, 2003: 251-160.
15. P Thienprasiddhi VC Greenstein CS Chen JM Liebmann R Ritch DC Hood 2003 Multifocal visual evoked potential responses in glaucoma patients with unilateral hemifield defects. Am J Ophthalmol 136: 34-40
16. DC Hood VC Greenstein 2003 Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res 22: 201-251
17. B Bengtsson 2002 Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 80: 620-626
18. DC Hood P Thienprasiddhi VC Greenstein BJ Winn N Ohri JM Liebmann R Ritch 2004 Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: A comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45: 492-498
19. DC Hood JG Odel X Zhang 2000 Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: A multifocal VEP study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41: 4032-4038
20. DC Hood X Zhang JE Hong CS Chen 2002 Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording. Doc Ophthalmol 104: 303-320
21. AI Klistorner SL Graham 2001 Electroencephalogram-based scaling of multifocal visual evoked potentials: Effect on intersubject amplitude variability. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42: 2145-2152
22. X Zhang DC Hood CS Chen JE Hong 2002 A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: An objective definition for poor records. Doc Ophthalmol 104: 287-302
23. M Bach 2001 Electrophysiological approaches for early detection of glaucoma. Eur J Ophthalmol 11 (Suppl 2) S41-S49
24. CA Johnson 2002 Recent developments in automated perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis and management. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 13: 77-84
25. DC Hood 2003 Objective measurement of visual function in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 14: 78-82
26. Coleman AL 2003 Epidemiology of glaucoma JC Morrison IP Pollack Glaucoma: Science and practice Thieme New York 2-11
27. MO Gordon JA Beiser JD Brandt DK Heuer EJ Higginbotham CA Johnson JL Keltner JP Miller RK Parrish 2nd MR Wilson MA Kass 2002 The ocular hypertension treatment study: Baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma Arch Ophthalmol 120: 714-720 discussion 829-830
28. GG Celesia D Kaufman S Cone 1987 Effects of age and sex on pattern electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 68: 161-171
29. KW Mitchell JW Howe SR Spencer 1987 Visual evoked potentials in the older population: Age and gender effects. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 8: 317-324
30. AS de Graaf CJ Lombard GL Hart 1985 Standards for the assessment of visual evoked potentials in an ethnically heterogeneous adult population. S Afr Med J 67: 243-245
31. NS Chu 1987 Pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials: Latency changes with gender and age. Clin Electroencephalogr 18: 159-162
32. S Tobimatsu S Kurita-Tashima M Nakayama-Hiromatsu K Akazawa M Kato 1993 Age-related changes in pattern visual evoked potentials: Differential effects of luminance, contrast and check size. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 88: 12-19
33. R Emmerson-Hanover DE Shearer DJ Creel RE Dustman 1994 Pattern reversal evoked potentials: Gender differences and age-related changes in amplitude and latency. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 92: 93-101
34. B Fortune DC Hood 2003 Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44: 1364 -1375
35. DC Hood X Zhang BJ Winn 2003 Detecting glaucomatous damage with multifocal visual evoked potentials: How can a monocular test work? J Glaucoma 12: 3-15
36. SD Slotnick SA Klein T Carney EE Sutter 2001 Electrophysiological estimate of human cortical magnification. Clin Neurophysiol 112: 1349-1356
37. SD Slotnick SA Klein T Carney E Sutter S Dastmalchi 1999 Using multi-stimulus VEP source localization to obtain a retinotopic map of human primary visual cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 110: 1793-1800
38. B Efron RJ Tibshirani 1993 An Introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC
39. A Heijl VM Patella 2002 Essential perimetry 3 Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc. Dublin, CA
40. BC Chauhan DB Henson AJ Hobley 1988 Cluster analysis in visual field quantification. Doc Ophthalmol 69: 25-39
41. J Katz A Sommer DE Gaasterland DR Anderson 1991 Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. Arch Ophthalmol 109: 1684-1689
42. S Mandava M Zulauf T Zeyen J Caprioli 1993 An evaluation of clusters in the glaucomatous visual field. Am J Ophthalmol 116: 684-691
43. CA Johnson PA Sample GA Cioffi JR Liebmann RN Weinreb 2002 Structure and function evaluation (SAFE): I. criteria for glaucomatous visual field loss using standard automated perimetry (SAP) and short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP). Am J Ophthalmol 134: 177-185
44. PG Spry CA Johnson 2001 Senescent changes of the normal visual field: An age-old problem. Optom Vis Sci 78: 436-441
45. C Balachandran AI Klistorner F Billson 2004 Multifocal VEP in children: its maturation and clinical application. Br J Ophthalmol 88: 226-232
46. S Tobimatsu 1995 Aging and pattern visual evoked potentials. Optom Vis Sci 72: 192-197
47. DC Hood JG Odel BJ Winn 2003 The multifocal visual evoked potential. J Neuroophthalmol 23: 279-289
48. DC Hood VC Greenstein JG Odel X Zhang R Ritch JM Liebmann JE Hong CS Chen P Thienprasiddhi 2002 Visual field defects and multifocal visual evoked potentials: Evidence of a linear relationship. Arch Ophthalmol 120: 1672-1681