The multifocal visual evoked potential: An objective measure of visual fields?

Vision Research

Volumn 45, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 1155-1163

  Seiple, William ^a   Holopigian, Karen ^a   Clemens, Colleen ^a   Greenstein, Vivienne C ^b   Hood, Donald C ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Divided attention; Multifocal visual evoked potential; Visual field

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MENTAL FUNCTION; MONOCULAR VISION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 13544260590     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2004.11.010     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. C.J. Aine, and M.R. Harter Event-related potentials to stroop stimuli. Color and word processing Annals of New York Academic Sciences 425 1984 152 153
2. D. Allen, C.W. Tyler, and A.M. Norcia Development of grating acuity and contrast sensitivity in the central and peripheral visual field of the human infant Vision Research 36 1996 1945 1953
3. C. Balachandran, A.I. Klistorner, and S.L. Graham Effect of stimulus check size on multifocal visual evoked potentials Documenta Ophthalmologica 106 2003 183 188
4. K.K. Ball, B.L. Beard, D.L. Roenker, R.L. Miller, and D.S. Griggs Age and visual search: expanding the useful field of view Journal of Optical Society of America A 5 1988 2210 2219
5. H.A. Baseler, E.E. Sutter, S.A. Klein, and T. Carney The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field Electroencephalography Clinical Neurophysiology 90 1994 65 81
6. M. Belmonte Shifts of visual spatial attention modulate a steady-state visual evoked potential Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 6 1998 295 307
7. B. Bengtsson, and A. Heijl SITA Fast, a new rapid perimetric threshold test. Description of methods and evaluation in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma Acta Ophthalmologica 76 1998 431 437
8. B. Bengtsson, and A. Heijl Inter-subject variability and normal limits of the SITA standard, SITA fast, and the Humphrey full threshold computerized perimetry strategies, SITA STATPAC Acta Ophthalmologica 77 1999 125 129
9. B. Bengtsson, and A. Heijl False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability? Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 41 2000 2201 2204
10. C.M. Birt, D.H. Shin, V. Samudrala, B.A. Hughes, C. Kim, and D. Lee Analysis of reliability indices from Humphrey visual field tests in an urban glaucoma population Ophthalmology 104 1997 1126 1130
11. A.M. Bonnel, and E.R. Hafter Divided attention between simultaneous auditory and visual signals Perception and Psychophysics 60 1998 179 190
12. C.S. Chen, D.C. Hood, X. Zhang, E.Z. Karam, J.M. Liebmann, and R. Ritch Repeat reliability of the multifocal visual evoked potential in normal and glaucomatous eyes Journal of Glaucoma 12 2003 399 408
13. S.A. Chen, L.Z. Wu, and D.Z. Wu Objective measurement of contrast sensitivity using the steady-state visual evoked potential Documenta Ophthalmologica 75 1990 145 153
14. N.T. Choplin, and P.E. Russell Visual field testing 1995 Slack Thorofare, NJ
15. M. D'Esposito, J.A. Detre, D.C. Alsop, R.K. Shin, S. Atlas, and M. Grossman The neural basis of the central executive system of working memory Nature 378 1995 279 281
16. F. Di Russo, and D. Spinelli Electrophysiological evidence for an early attentional mechanism in visual processing in humans Vision Research 39 1999 2975 2985
17. F. Di Russo, D. Spinelli, and M.C. Morrone Automatic gain control contrast mechanisms are modulated by attention in humans: evidence from visual evoked potentials Vision Research 41 2001 2435 2447
18. A. Dove, S. Pollmann, T. Schubert, C.J. Wiggins, and D.Y. von Cramon Prefrontal cortex activation in task switching: an event-related fMRI study Cognitive Brain Research 9 2000 103 109
19. R.G. Eason, M.R. Harter, and C. White Effects of attention and arousal on visually evoked cortical potentials and reaction times Physiology and Behavior 4 1969 283 289
20. M.A. Fernandes, and M. Moscovitch Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding Journal of Experimental and Psychological Genetics 129 2000 155 176
21. N. Fujimoto, and E. Adachi Usami Increased sensitivity with decreased numbers of test points and decreased test field size in automated perimetry of normal subjects Ophthalmologica 204 1992 88 92
22. J. Gerling, T. Meigen, and M. Bach Shift of equiluminance in congenital color vision deficiencies: pattern-ERG, VEP and psychophysical findings Vision Research 37 1997 821 826
23. C. Gerth, P.B. Delahunt, M.A. Crognale, and J.S. Werner Topography of the chromatic pattern-onset VEP Journal of Vision 3 2003 171 182
24. D.M. Gronwall Paced auditory serial-addition task: a measure of recovery from concussion Perceptual and Motor Skills 44 1977 367 373
25. W.M. Hart, and B. Becker The onset and evolution of glaucomatous visual field defects Ophthalmology 89 1982 268 279
26. M.R. Harter, W.H. Seiple, and L.E. Salmon Evoked cortical responses to dichoptically presented patterned light flashes: interocular interaction T-I-T Journal of Life Science 2 1972 27 33
27. M.R. Harter, and C.T. White Evoked cortical responses to checkerboard patterns: effect of check-size as a function of visual acuity Electroencephalography Clinical Neurophysiology 28 1970 48 54
28. A. Heijl Time changes of contrast thresholds during automatic perimetry Acta Ophthalmologica 55 1977 696 708
29. A. Heijl, G. Lindgren, and J. Olsson Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field Arch Ophthalmologica 105 1987 1544 1549
30. P. Herath, T. Klingberg, J. Young, K. Amunts, and P. Roland Neural correlates of dual task interference can be dissociated from those of divided attention: an fMRI study Cerebral Cortex 11 2001 796 805
31. S.A. Hillyard, E.K. Vogel, and S.J. Luck Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society of London B: Biological Science 353 1998 1257 1270
32. C. Holmin, and C.E. Krakau Variability of glaucomatous visual field defects in computerized perimetry Albrecht Von Graefes Archiv Fur Klinische Und Experimentelle Ophthalmologie 210 1979 235 250
33. D.C. Hood Objective measurement of visual function in glaucoma Current Opinions in Ophthalmology 14 2003 78 82
34. D.C. Hood, and V.C. Greenstein Multifocal VEP and ganglion cell damage: applications and limitations for the study of glaucoma Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 22 2003 201 251
35. D.C. Hood, and X. Zhang Multifocal ERG and VEP responses and visual fields: comparing disease-related changes Documenta Ophthalmologica 100 2000 115 137
36. D.C. Hood, X. Zhang, J.E. Hong, and C.S. Chen Quantifying the benefits of additional channels of multifocal VEP recording Documenta Ophthalmologica 104 2002 303 320
37. M. Hoshiyama, and R. Kakigi Effects of attention on pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials: foveal field stimulation versus peripheral field stimulation Brain Topography 13 2001 293 298
38. Humphrey Humphrey field analyzer II: user's guide 1998 Humphrey Systems Dublin, CA
39. J. Katz, and A. Sommer Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss. The effect of patient reliability Ophthalmology 97 1990 1032 1037
40. J. Katz, A. Sommer, and K. Witt Reliability of visual field results over repeated testing Ophthalmology 98 1991 70 75
41. J.L. Keltner, C.A. Johnson, J.M. Quigg, K.E. Cello, M.A. Kass, and M.O. Gordon Confirmation of visual field abnormalities in the ocular hypertension treatment study. Ocular hypertension treatment study group Archives of Ophthalmology 118 2000 1187 1194
42. A.I. Klistorner, and S.L. Graham Multifocal pattern VEP perimetry: analysis of sectoral waveforms Documenta Ophthalmologica 98 1999 183 196
43. E. Koechlin, G. Basso, P. Pietrini, S. Panzer, and J. Grafman The role of the anterior prefrontal cortex in human cognition Nature 399 1999 148 151
44. M.J. Kupersmith, W.H. Seiple, J.I. Nelson, and R.E. Carr Contrast sensitivity loss in multiple sclerosis. Selectivity by eye, orientation, and spatial frequency measured with the evoked potential Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 25 1984 632 639
45. M. Kutas, and S.A. Hillyard Reading between the lines: event-related brain potentials during natural sentence processing Brain Language 11 1980 354 373
46. K.E. Kutzko, C.F. Brito, and M. Wall Effect of instructions on conventional automated perimetry Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 41 2000 2006 2013
47. N. Lavie Capacity limits in selective attention: behavioral evidence and implications for neural activity J. Braun C. Koch J.L. Davis Visual attention and cortical curcuits 2001 The MIT Press Cambridge, MA 49 68
48. H.W. Liebowitz, and S. Appelle The effects of a central task on luminance thresholds for peripherally presented stimuli Human Factors 11 1969 387 392
49. S.J. Luck, and M. Girelli Electrophysiological approaches to the study of selective attention in the human brain R. Parasuraman The attentive brain 1998 The MIT Press Cambridge, MA 71 94
50. S.J. Luck, and S.A. Hillyard Electrophysiological evidence for parallel and serial processing during visual search Perception and Psychophysics 48 1990 603 617
51. G.R. Mangun Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention Psychophysiology 32 1995 4 18
52. G.R. Mangun, and L.A. Buck Sustained visual-spatial attention produces costs and benefits in response time and evoked neural activity Neuropsychologia 36 1998 189 200
53. G.R. Mangun, and S.A. Hillyard The spatial allocation of visual attention as indexed by event-related brain potentials Human Factors 29 1987 195 211
54. A.D. Mehta, I. Ulbert, and C.E. Schroeder Intermodal selective attention in monkeys. I: Distribution and timing of effects across visual areas Cerebral Cortex 10 2000 343 358
55. M.M. Muller, T.W. Picton, P. Valdes-Sosa, J. Riera, W.A. Teder-Salejarvi, and S.A. Hillyard Effects of spatial selective attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20-28 Hz range Brain Research Cognition Brain Research 6 1998 249 261
56. J.I. Nelson, W.H. Seiple, M.J. Kupersmith, and R.E. Carr Lock-in techniques for the swept stimulus evoked potential Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 1 1984 409 436
57. A.M. Norcia, and C.W. Tyler Spatial frequency sweep VEP: visual acuity during the first year of life Vision Research 25 1985 1399 1408
58. A.M. Norcia, C.W. Tyler, and R.D. Hamer Development of contrast sensitivity in the human infant Vision Research 30 1990 1475 1486
59. S. Parks, D. Keating, A.L. Evans, T.H. Williamson, J.L. Jay, and A.T. Elliott Comparison of repeatability of the multifocal electroretinogram and Humphrey perimeter Documenta Ophthalmologica 92 1997 281 289
60. S. Plainis, I.J. Murray, and K. Chauhan Raised visual detection thresholds depend on the level of complexity of cognitive foveal loading Perception 30 2001 1203 1212
61. E.M. Rantanen, and J.H. Goldberg The effects of mental workload on the visual field size and shape Ergonomics 42 1999 816 834
62. D. Regan Evoked potential and psychophysical correlates of changes in stimulus colour and intensity Vision Research 10 1970 163 178
63. D. Regan Spatial frequency mechanisms in human vision investigated by evoked potential recording Vision Research 23 1983 1401 1407
64. M. Schmitter-Edgecombe The effects of divided attention on implicit and explicit memory performance Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2 1996 111 125
65. W. Seiple, C. Clemens, V.C. Greenstein, K. Holopigian, and X. Zhang The spatial distribution of selective attention assessed using the multifocal visual evoked potential Vision Research 42 2002 1513 1521
66. W. Seiple, J.P. Szlyk, S. Yang, and K. Holopigian Age-related functional field losses are not eccentricity dependent Vision Research 36 1996 1859 1866
67. W.H. Seiple, M.J. Kupersmith, J.I. Nelson, and R.E. Carr The assessment of evoked potential contrast thresholds using real-time retrieval Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 25 1984 627 631
68. R. Sekuler, and K. Ball Visual localization: age and practice Journal of Optical Society of America A 3 1986 864 867
69. S. Sokol, A. Moskowitz, G. McCormack, and R. Augliere Infant grating acuity is temporally tuned Vision Research 28 1988 1357 1366
70. P. Stager, and G.J. Laabs The effect of divided attention on probe reaction time in multiple-task performance Canadian Journal of Psychology 31 1977 174 183
71. H. Strasburger, A. Remky, I.J. Murray, C. Hadjizenonos, and I. Rentschler Objective measurement of contrast sensitivity and visual acuity with the steady-state visual evoked potential German Journal of Ophthalmology 5 1996 42 52
72. E.E. Sutter, and D. Tran The field topography of ERG components in man-I. The photopic luminance response Vision Research 32 1992 433 446
73. V.L. Towle, and M.R. Harter Objective determination of human visual acuity: pattern evoked potentials Investigative and Ophthalmology and Visual Science 16 1977 1073 1076
74. S.T. Van Voorhis, and S.A. Hillyard Visual evoked potentials and selective attention to points in space Perception and Psychophysics 22 1997 54 62
75. M. Wall, C.A. Johnson, K.E. Kutzko, R. Nguyen, C. Brito, and J.L. Keltner Long- and short-term variability of automated perimetry results in patients with optic neuritis and healthy subjects Archives of Ophthalmology 116 1998 53 61
76. M. Wall, K.R. Woodward, and C.F. Brito The effect of attention on conventional automated perimetry and luminance size threshold perimetry Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 45 2004 342 350
77. R.G. Webster, and G.M. Haslerud Influence on extreme peripheral vision of attention to a visual or auditory task Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 1964 269 272
78. E.B. Werner, A. Adelson, and T. Krupin Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in clinically stable glaucoma patients Ophthalmology 95 1988 764 767
79. E.B. Werner, T. Krupin, A. Adelson, and M.E. Feitl Effect of patient experience on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma suspect patients Ophthalmology 97 1990 44 48
80. E.B. Werner, B. Petrig, T. Krupin, and K.I. Bishop Variability of automated visual fields in clinically stable glaucoma patients Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 30 1989 1083 1089
81. E.B. Werner, N. Saheb, and D. Thomas Variability of static visual threshold responses in patients with elevated IOPs Archives of Ophthalmology 100 1982 1627 1631
82. C.T. White Evoked cortical responses and patterned stimuli American Journal of Psychology 24 1969 211 214
83. J.M. Wild, M. Dengler_Harles, A.E. Searle, E.C. O_Neill, and S.J. Crews The influence of the learning effect on automated perimetry in patients with suspected glaucoma Acta Ophthalmologica 67 1989 537 545
84. L.J. Williams Cognitive load and the functional field of view Human Factors 24 1982 683 692
85. M. Yu, D.Z. Wu, J. Liang, and L. Wu Objective assessment of visual acuity with visual evoked potential Eye Science 13 1997 59 61
86. X. Zhang, D.C. Hood, C.S. Chen, and J.E. Hong A signal-to-noise analysis of multifocal VEP responses: an objective definition for poor records Documenta Ophthalmologica 104 2002 287 302