What is the midterm survivorship and function after hip resurfacing?

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 468, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 3221-3227

  Rahman, Luthfur ^a   Muirhead Allwood, Sarah K ^a   Alkinj, Muhannad ^a  

^a London Hip Unit   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BODY MASS; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HIP SURGERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL TIME; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

EID: 78649326612     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1438-x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. HC Amstutz ST Ball MJ Le Duff FJ Dorey 2007 Resurfacing THA for patients younger than 50 year: results of 2 to 9 year followup Clin Orthop Relat Res. 460 159 164 17310929
2. HC Amstutz PE Beaule FJ Dorey MJ Le Duff PA Campbell TA Gruen 2004 Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study J Bone Joint Surg Am. 86 28 39 14711942
3. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA; 2009. Available at: www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/ aoanjrr/documents/aoanjrrreport-2009.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2010.
4. DL Back R Dalziel D Young A Shimmin 2005 Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings: an independent prospective study of the first 230 hips J Bone Joint Surg Br. 87 324 329 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7ktFOksQ%3D%3D 10.1302/0301-620X.87B3.15556 15773639
5. PE Beaulé FJ Dorey M LeDuff T Gruen HC Amstutz 2004 Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip Clin Orthop Relat Res. 418 87 93 10.1097/00003086-200401000-00015 15043098
6. N Bellamy W Buchanan C Goldsmith J Campbell LW Stitt 1988 Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee J Rheumatol. 15 1833 1840 1:STN:280: DyaL1M7lslCrsQ%3D%3D 3068365
7. P Bizot L Banallec L Sedel R Nizard 2000 Alumina-on-alumina total hip prostheses in patients 40 years of age or younger Clin Orthop Relat Res. 379 68 76 10.1097/00003086-200010000-00010 11039794
8. ML Buergi WL Walter 2007 Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the Australian experience J Arthroplasty. 22 61 65 10.1016/j.arth.2007.05.021 17919596
9. BR Burroughs B Hallstrom GJ Golladay D Hoeffel WH Harris 2005 Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes J Arthroplasty. 20 11 19 10.1016/j.arth.2004.07.008 15660054
10. JF Crowe VJ Mani CS Ranawat 1979 Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip J Bone Joint Surg Am. 61 15 23 1:STN:280:DyaE1M%2FovVOntA%3D%3D 365863
11. J Daniel PB Pynsent DJ McMinn 2004 Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis J Bone Joint Surg Br. 86 177 184 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7ltlaisg%3D%3D 10.1302/0301-620X.86B2.14600 15046429
12. Daniel J, Ziaee H, McMinn DJW. Acetabular bone conservation. In: McMinn D, ed. Modern Hip Resurfacing. London: Springer-Verlag; 2009:129-130.
13. J Dawson R Fitzpatrick A Carr D Murray 1996 Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br. 78 185 190 1:STN:280:DyaK283gvFCnsQ%3D%3D 8666621
14. R De Haan C Pattyn HS Gill DW Murray PA Campbell K De Smet 2008 Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br. 90 1291 1297 10.1302/0301-620X.90B10.20533 18827237
15. LD Dorr TJ Kane III JP Conaty 1994 Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 45 years old or younger: a 16-year follow-up study J Arthroplasty. 9 453 456 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7gsFyitA%3D%3D 10.1016/0883-5403(94) 90090-6 7807101
16. J Girard M Lavigne PA Vendittoli AG Roy 2006 Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br. 88 721 726 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28vgvFelsw%3D%3D 16720762
17. Grigoris P, Roberts P, Panousis K, Bosch H. The evolution of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36:125-134, vii.
18. N Hallab 2001 Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopedic implants J Clin Rheumatol. 7 215 218 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2svgtVylsQ%3D%3D 10.1097/00124743- 200108000-00004 17039137
19. WH Harris 1969 Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation J Bone Joint Surg Am. 51 737 755 1:STN:280:DyaF1M3gtlWltQ%3D%3D 5783851
20. AJ Hart P Buddhdev P Winship N Faria JJ Powell JA Skinner 2008 Cup inclination angle of greater than 50 degrees increases whole blood concentrations of cobalt and chromium ions after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing Hip Int. 18 212 219 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cnmtlCitw%3D%3D 18924077
21. AJ Hart JA Skinner P Winship N Faria E Kulinskaya D Webster S Muirhead-Allwood CH Aldam H Anwar JJ Powell 2009 Circulating levels of cobalt and chromium from metal-on-metal hip replacement are associated with CD8+ T-cell lymphopenia J Bone Joint Surg Br. 91 835 842 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1MzoslOlsw%3D%3D 10.1302/0301-620X.91B6.21844 19483243
22. GN Heilpern NN Shah MJ Fordyce 2008 Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up J Bone Joint Surg Br. 90 1137 1142 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1crntFOltg%3D%3D 10.1302/0301-620X.90B9.20524 18757951
23. DW Howie RW McCalden NS Nawana K Costi MJ Pearcy C Subramanian 2005 The long-term wear of retrieved McKee-Farrar metal-on-metal total hip prostheses J Arthroplasty. 20 350 357 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.028 15809954
24. AB Joshi ML Porter IA Trail LP Hunt JC Murphy K Hardinge 1993 Long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients J Bone Joint Surg Br. 75 616 623 1:STN:280:DyaK3szit1ektw%3D%3D 8331119
25. EL Kaplan P Meier 1958 Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations J Am Stat Assoc. 53 457 481 10.2307/2281868
26. M Khan JH Kuiper D Edwards E Robinson JB Richardson 2009 Birmingham hip arthroplasty: five to eight years of prospective multicenter results J Arthroplasty. 24 1044 1050 10.1016/j.arth.2008.07.016 18834698
27. VV Killampalli RK Kundra F Chaudhry M Chowdhry NE Fisher AD Reading 2009 Resurfacing and uncemented arthroplasty for young hip arthritis: functional outcomes at 5 years Hip Int. 19 234 238 19876877
28. S Kobayashi NS Eftekhar K Terayama RP Joshi 1997 Comparative study of total hip arthroplasty between younger and older patients Clin Orthop Relat Res. 339 140 151 10.1097/00003086-199706000-00019 9186212
29. MJ Le Duff HC Amstutz FJ Dorey 2007 Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for obese patients J Bone Joint Surg Am 89 2705 2711 10.2106/JBJS.F.01563 18056503
30. I Leslie S Williams C Brown G Isaac Z Jin E Ingham J Fisher 2008 Effect of bearing size on the long-term wear, wear debris, and ion levels of large diameter metal-on-metal hip replacements-an in vitro study J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 87 163 172 18386846
31. Lilikakis AK, Vowler SL, Villar RN. Hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implant in metal-on-metal resurfacing hip arthroplasty: minimum of two years follow-up. Orthop Clin North Am. 2005;36:215-222, ix.
32. SJ MacDonald 2004 Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: the concerns Clin Orthop Relat Res. 429 86 93 10.1097/01.blo.0000150309.48474.8b 15577471
33. Madhu TS, Akula MR, Raman RN, Sharma HK, Johnson VG. The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing prosthesis an independent single surgeon's experience at 7-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Jan 5. [Epub ahead of print]
34. KT Mäkelä A Eskelinen P Pulkkinen P Paavolainen V Remes 2008 Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry J Bone Joint Surg Am. 90 2160 2170 10.2106/JBJS.G.00870 18829914
35. DR Marker K Strimbu MS McGrath MG Zywiel MA Mont 2009 Resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty-review of comparative clinical and basic science studies Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 67 120 127 19583538
36. H McKellop SH Park R Chiesa P Doorn B Lu P Normand P Grigoris H Amstutz 1996 In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use Clin Orthop Relat Res 329 Suppl S128 S140 10.1097/00003086- 199608001-00013 8769330
37. McMinn DJW. Acetabular preparation and insertion of the standard Birmingham Hip Resurfacing cup. In: McMinn D, ed. Modern Hip Resurfacing. London, England: Springer-Verlag; 2009:223-236.
38. MA Mont PS Ragland D Marker 2005 Resurfacing hip arthroplasty: comparison of a minimally invasive versus standard approach Clin Orthop Relat Res. 441 125 131 10.1097/01.blo.0000195100.09313.b0 16330994
39. MA Mont TM Seyler DR Marker GA Marulanda RE Delanois 2006 Use of metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 Suppl 3 90 97 10.2106/JBJS.F.00543 17079373
40. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on the use of metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. 2002. Available at: www.nice.org.uk/ nicemedia/pdf/HipResurfacing-FinalGuidance.pdf. Accessed October 13, 2009.
41. National Joint Registry 6th Annual Report. Available at: www.njrcentre.org.uk/NjrCentre/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=V5%2bELEMfw20%3d& tabid=86&mid=523. Accessed October 13, 2009.
42. T Nishii N Sugano H Miki M Takao T Koyama H Yoshikawa 2007 Five-year results of metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients J Arthroplasty. 22 176 183 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.008 17275630
43. RM Nunley CJ Della Valle RL Barrack 2009 Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 467 56 65 10.1007/s11999-008-0558-z 18941859
44. AJ Shimmin D Back 2005 Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham Hip Resurfacing J Bone Joint Surg Br. 87 463 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7mt12ltA%3D%3D 10.1302/0301-620X.87B4.15498 15795193
45. M Silva KH Lee C Heisel MA Dela Rosa TP Schmalzried 2004 The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am. 86 40 46 14711943
46. RT Steffen PR Foguet SJ Krikler R Gundle DJ Beard DW Murray 2009 Femoral neck fractures after hip resurfacing J Arthroplasty. 24 614 619 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.008 18555654
47. RT Steffen HP Pandit J Palan DJ Beard R Gundle P McLardy-Smith DW Murray HS Gill 2008 The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series J Bone Joint Surg Br. 90 436 441 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3hvFOksA%3D%3D 10.1302/0301-620X.90B4.19648 18378915
48. RB Treacy CW McBryde PB Pynsent 2005 Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five years J Bone Joint Surg Br. 87 167 170 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7gs1elsg%3D%3D 10.1302/0301-620X.87B2.15030 15736736