Resurfacing and uncemented arthroplasty for young hip arthritis: Functional outcomes at 5 years

HIP International

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 234-238

  Killampalli, Vijay V ^a   Kundra, Rakesh K ^b   Choudary, Fouad ^b   Chowdhry, Majid ^b   Fisher, Noel E ^b   Reading, Alexander D ^b  

^a HINCHINGBROOKE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Functional outcomes; Hip resurfacing; Osteoarthritis; Uncemented total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DYSPLASIA; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RESURFACING HIP ARTHROPLASTY; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; UNCEMENTED HIP ARTHROPLASTY;

EID: 70449382070     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/112070000901900308     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Chandler HP, Reineck FT, Wixson RL, et al. Total hip replacement in patients younger than thirty years old: A five year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981; 63: 1426-34.
2. Dorr DL, Kane TJ 3rd, Conaty JP. Long-term results of cemeted total hip arthroplasty in patients aged 45 years old or younger: A 16 year follow-up study. J Arthroplaty 1994; 9: 453-6.
3. Callaghan JJ, Forest EE, Sporer SM et al. Total hip arthroplasty in the young adult. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 344: 257-62.
4. Crowther JD, Lachiwicz PF. Survival and polyethylene wear of porous-coated acetabular components in patients less than fifty years old: Results at nine to fourteen years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84: 729-35.
5. Amstutz HC, Grigoris P, Doery FJ. Evolution and future of surface replacement of the hip. J Orthop Sci 1998; 3: 169-86.
6. McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, et al. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 329: S89-98.
7. Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I, et al. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: A mid-to long-term study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2006; 77: 57-70.
8. Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I, et al. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in younger patients in the Finnish arthrplasty register. 4661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years. Acta Orthop 2005; 76: 28-41.
9. Harris WH. Hybrid total hip replacement: rationale and intermediate clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 333: 155-64.
10. Sporer SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP et al. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty in patients under the age of fifty: A five- to ten-year follow-up. J Arthroplaty 1998; 13: 485-91.
11. Lewallen DG, Cabanela ME. Hybrid primary total hip arthroplasty: A 5- to 9-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996; 333: 126-33.
12. Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 167-70.
13. Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJ. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patietns under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 177-84.
14. Amstutz HC, Beaule PE, Dorey FJ, et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arhtroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86: 28-39.
15. Davies AP, Willert HG, Campbell PA et al. An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 18-27.
16. Willert HG, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A, et al. Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 28-36.
17. Korovessis P, Petsinis G, Repanti M, et al. Metallosis after contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Five to nine-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1183-91.
18. Jacobs JJ, Hallab NJ. Loosening and osteolysis associated with metal-on-metal bearings: A local effect of metal hypersensitivity? J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88: 1171-2.
19. Park YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ, et al. Early osteolysis following second-generation metal-on-metal hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 1515-21.
20. Shimmin AJ, Back D. Femoral neck fractures folowing Birmingham hip resurfacing: A national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 463-4.
21. Amstutz HC, Campbell PA, Le Duff MJ. Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 2004; 86: 1874-7.
22. Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLary-Smith P, et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resufacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 847-51.
23. Shimmin AJ, Bare J, Back DL. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005; 36: 187-93.
24. Reigstad O, Siewers P, Rokkum M, et al. Excellent long-term survival of an uncemented press-fit stem and screw cup in young patients: follow-up of 75hips for 15-18 years. Acta Orthop 2008; 79: 194-202.
25. Crawford JR, Palmer SJ, Wimhurst JA, et al. Bone loss at hip resurfacing: a comparison with total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 2005; 15: 195-8.
26. Vendittoli A, Lavigne M, Girard J, et al. A randomised study comparing resection of acetabular bone at resurfacing and total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88: 997-1002.
27. Gore DR, Murray MP, Gardner GM, et al. Hip function after total vs. surface replacement. Acta Orthop Scand 1985; 56: 386-90.
28. Girard J, Lavigne M, Vendittoli PA, et al. Biomechanical reconsrtuction of the hip: A randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88: 721-6.
29. Capello WN, Trancik TM, Misamore G, et al. Analysis of revision surgery of resurfacing hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982; 170: 50-5.
30. Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89: 735-41.
31. Back DL, Dalziel R, Young D, et al. Early results of primary Birmingham resufacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 324-9.
32. Berger RA, Jacobs JJ, Quigley LR, et al. Primary cementless acetabular reconstruction in patients younger than 50 years old: 7- to 11-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 344: 216-26.
33. Hallan G, Lie SA, Havelin LI. High wear rates and extensive osteolysis in 3 types of uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a review of the PCA, the Harris Galante and the Profile/Tri Lock Plus arthroplasties with a minimum of 12 years median follow-up in 96 hips. Acta Orthop 2006; 77: 575-84.
34. Nieuwenhuis JJ, Malefijt Jde W, Hendriks JC, et al. Unsatisfactory results with the cementless Omnifit acetabular component due to polyethylene and severe osteolysis. Acta Orthop Belg 2005; 71: 294-302.
35. Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, et al. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88: 592-600.