The Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Prosthesis. An Independent Single Surgeon's Experience at 7-Year Follow-Up

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-8

  Madhu, Tiruveedhula S ^a   Akula, Mahesh R ^a   Raman, Raghu N ^a   Sharma, Hemant K ^a   Johnson, Verne G ^a  

^a HULL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Birmingham hip resurfacing; Osteonecrosis; Pedestal sign

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIRMINGHAM HIP RESURFACING PROSTHESIS; BURSITIS; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; FEMUR NECK FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OSSIFICATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PAIN; PERONEUS NERVE PARALYSIS; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SURGICAL INFECTION; X RAY FILM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; REOPERATION;

EID: 78650040828     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.10.010     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Shimmin A., Beaulé P.E., Campbell P. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:637.
2. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry annual report 2007, Adelaide, AOA.
3. Pandit H., Glyn-Jones S., McLardy-Smith P., et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90-B:847.
4. De Haan R., Pattyn C., Gill H.S., et al. Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90-B:1291.
5. Smith and Nephew No authors listed, (date last accessed January 31, 2009). http://www.hipresurfacing.com/patients.asp.
6. Daniel J., Pynsent P.B., McMinn D.J. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004, 86-B:177.
7. Treacy R.B., McBryde C.W., Pynsent P.B. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2005, 87-B:167.
8. Hing C.B., Back D.L., Bailey M., et al. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years: an independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2007, 89-B:1431.
9. Back D.L., Dalziel R., Young D., et al. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings: an independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87-B:324.
10. DeSmet K.A., Pattyn C., Verdonck R. Early results of a primary Birmingham hip resurfacing using a hybrid metal-on-metal couple. Hip Int 2002, 12:158.
11. Pollard T.C., Baker R.P., Eastaugh-Waring S.J., et al. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88:592.
12. Steffen R.T., Pandit H.P., Palan J., et al. The five-year results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:436.
13. Heilpern G.N., Shah N.N., Fordyce M.J. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a series of 110 consecutive hips with a minimum five-year clinical and radiological follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90:1137.
14. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Carr A., et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996, 78-B:185.
15. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty: an end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969, 51-A:737.
16. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1972, 54:61.
17. SF-36 No authors listed, (date last accessed January 31, 2009). http://www.sf-36.org/tools/sf36.shtml.
18. Amstutz H.C., Beaul'e P.E., Dorey F.J., et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86:28.
19. Brooker A.F., Bowerman J.W., Robinson R.A., et al. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973, 55A:1629.
20. Berry D.J., Harmsen W.S., Cabanela M.E., et al. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84:171.
21. Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2006, No authors listed, (date last accessed January 31, 2009).
22. Mäkelä K., Eskelinen A., Pulkkinen P., et al. Cemented total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis in patients aged 55 years or older. Results of the 12 most common cemented implants followed for 25 years in the Finnish arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90-B:1562.
23. Williams H.D.W., Browne G., Gie G.A., et al. The Exeter universal cemented femoral component at 8 to 12 years: a study of the first 325 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002, 84-B:324.
24. Hallan G., Lie S.A., Furnes O., et al. Medium- and long-term performance of 11,516 uncemented primary femoral stems from the Norwegian arthroplasty register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:1574.
25. Shetty A.A., Slack R., Tindall A., et al. Results of a hydroxyapatite-coated (Furlong) total hip replacement: a 13- to 15-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87-B:1050.
26. Rajaratnam S.S., Jack C., Tavakkolizadeh A., et al. Long-term results of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component in total hip replacement: a 15- to 21-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90-B:27.
27. de Jong P.T., Haverkamp D., van der Vis D.H.M., et al. Total hip replacement with a superolateral bone graft for osteoarthritis secondary to dysplasia: a long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006, 88-B:173.
28. Chougle A., Hemmady M.V., Hodgkinson J.P. Severity of hip dysplasia and loosening of the socket in cemented total hip replacement: a long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87-B:16.
29. Ortiguera C.J., Pulliam I.T., Cabanela M.E. Total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis: matched-pair analysis of 188 hips with long-term follow-up. J Arthroplasty 1999, 14:218.
30. Rozkydal Z., Janícek P., Smíd Z. Total hip replacement with the CLS expansion shell and a structural femoral head autograft for patients with congenital hip disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:801.
31. Hartley W.T., McAuley J.P., Culpepper W.J., et al. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head treated with cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000, 82:1408.
32. Amstutz H.C., Antoniades J.T., Le Duff M.J. Results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing for Crowe type-I and II developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:339.
33. McBryde C.W., Shears E., O'Hara J.N., et al. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in developmental dysplasia: a case-control study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008, 90-B:708.
34. Revell M.P., McBryde C.W., Bhatnagar S., et al. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006, 88:98.
35. Capello W.N., Ireland P.H., Trammell T.R., et al. Conservative total hip arthroplasty: a procedure to conserve bone stock. Part I: analysis of sixty-six patients. Part II: analysis of failures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978, 134:59.
36. Shimmin AJ, Bare J, Back DL. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2005;36:187, ix.
37. Shimmin A.J., Back D. Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87:463.
38. Campbell P., Beaul'e P., Ebramzadeh E., et al. A study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 453:35.
39. Beaule P.E., Dorey F.J., LeDuff M.J., et al. Risk factors affecting outcome of metal on metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 2004, 418:87.
40. Steffen R., O'Rourke K., Gill H.S., et al. The anterolateral approach leads to less disruption of the femoral head-neck blood supply than the posterior approach during hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007, 89:1293.