AFRA: Argumentation framework with recursive attacks

International Journal of Approximate Reasoning

Volumn 52, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 19-37

  Baroni, Pietro ^a   Cerutti, Federico ^a   Giacomin, Massimiliano ^a   Guida, Giovanni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Argument attack relation; Argumentation frameworks; Argumentation semantics

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENT ATTACK RELATION; ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; ARGUMENTATION SEMANTICS; CONCEPTUAL MODELLING; ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLES;

EID: 78649253192     PISSN: 0888613X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2010.05.004     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. P.M. Dung On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games Artificial Intelligence 77 2 1995 321 357
2. L. Amgoud, and C. Cayrol A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 34 2002 197 216
3. L. Amgoud, and S. Kaci An argumentation framework for merging conflicting knowledge bases International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 45 2007 321 340
4. T.J.M. Bench-Capon Persuasion in practical argument using value based argumentation frameworks Journal of Logic and Computation 13 3 2003 429 448
5. S. Kaci, and L. van der Torre Preference-based argumentation: arguments supporting multiple values International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 48 2007 730 751
6. L. Amgoud, C. Cayrol, M.-C. Lagasquie-Schiex, and P. Livet On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks International Journal of Intelligent Systems 23 2008 1062 1093
7. C. Cayrol, and M.-C. Lagasquie-Schiex Coalitions of arguments: a tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks International Journal of Intelligent Systems 25 1 2010 83 109
8. P.E. Dunne, A. Hunter, P. McBurney, S. Parsons, M. Wooldridge, Inconsistency tolerance in weighted argument systems, in: AAMAS '09: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 2009, pp. 851-858.
9. S. Modgil An abstract theory of argumentation that accommodates defeasible reasoning about preferences K. Mellouli, Proceedings of the 9th European Conf. on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2007) LLNAI 2007 Springer Verlag Hammamet, TN 648 659
10. S. Modgil, and T.J.M. Bench-Capon Integrating object and meta-level value based argumentation P. Besnard, S. Doutre, A. Hunter, Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008 Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications vol. 172 2008 IOS Press Toulouse, F 240 251
11. S. Modgil Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks Artificial Intelligence 173 9-10 2009 901 934
12. P. Baroni, and M. Giacomin Semantics of abstract argumentation systems G.R. Simari, I. Rahwan, Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence 2009 Springer Science + Business Media 25 44
13. P. Baroni, and M. Giacomin On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics Artificial Intelligence (Special Issue on Argumentation in A.I.) 171 10/15 2007 675 700
14. P. Baroni, and M. Giacomin Skepticism relations for comparing argumentation semantics International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 50 6 2009 854 866
15. G. Boella, L. van der Torre, and S. Villata Social viewpoints for arguing about coalitions B. The Duy, T.V. Ho, Q.T. Ha, Proceedings of the 11th Pacific Rim Int. Conf. on Multi-Agents (PRIMA'08) LLNAI 2008 Springer Verlag 66 77
16. G. Boella, L. van der Torre, and S. Villata Attack relations among dynamic coalitions A. Nijholt, M. Pantic, M. Poel, G. Hondorp, Proceedings 20th Belgian-Netherlands Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC '08) 2008 University of Twente Enschede 25 32
17. H. Barringer, D.M. Gabbay, and J.V. Woods Temporal dynamics of support and attack networks: from argumentation to zoology D. Hutter, W. Stephan, Mechanizing Mathematical Reasoning 2005 Springer 59 98
18. M. Caminada Semi-stable semantics P.E. Dunne, T.J.M. Bench-Capon, Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006 Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications vol. 144 2006 IOS Press Liverpool, UK 121 130
19. P. Dung, P. Mancarella, and F. Toni A dialectic procedure for sceptical assumption-based argumentation P.E. Dunne, T.J.M. Bench-Capon, Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2006 Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications vol. 144 2006 IOS Press Liverpool, UK 145 156
20. P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, and G. Guida Encompassing attacks to attacks in abstract argumentation frameworks C. Sossai, G. Chemello, Proceedings of the 10th European Conf. on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2009) LLNAI 2009 Springer Verlag Verona, I 83 94
21. M. Wooldridge, P. McBurney, S. Parsons, On the meta-logic of arguments, in: Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS '05), Utrecht, NL, 2005, pp. 560-567.
22. G. Boella, D.M. Gabbay, and L.V.S. van der Torre Meta-argumentation modelling I: methodology and techniques Studia Logica 93 2/3 2009 297 355
23. D. Gabbay Semantics for higher level attacks in extended argumentation frames. Part 1: Overview Studia Logica 93 2/3 2009 357 381
24. D. Gabbay Fibring argumentation frames Studia Logica 93 2/3 2009 231 295
25. U. Egly, S.A. Gaggl, S. Woltran, Answer-set programming encodings for argumentation frameworks, Technical Report DBAI-TR-2008-62, Technische Universität Wien, 2008.
26. U. Egly, S.A. Gaggl, and S. Woltran Aspartix: implementing argumentation frameworks using answer-set programming M. Garcia de la Banda, E. Pontelli, Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2008), Udine Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 5366 2008 Springer 734 738
27. T.J.M. Bench-Capon, S. Doutre, and P.E. Dunne Audiences in argumentation frameworks Artificial Intelligence 171 1 2007 42 71
28. P. Baroni, F. Cerutti, M. Giacomin, G. Guida, An argumentation-based approach to modeling decision support contexts with what-if capabilities, in: AAAI Fall Symposium Series - The Uses of Computational Argumentation, AAAI, 2009, pp. 2-7.