An argumentation-based approach to modeling decision support contexts with what-if capabilities

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-09-06, Issue , 2009, Pages 2-7

  Baroni, Pietro ^a   Cerutti, Federico ^a   Giacomin, Massimiliano ^a   Guida, Giovanni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; DECISION PROBLEMS; DECISION SUPPORTS; MEDICAL TREATMENT; MODELING DECISIONS; MODELING TOOL; REASONING CAPABILITIES; REASONING PATTERNS;

FORMAL LOGIC;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 77954240093     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Atkinson, K.; Bench-Capon, T. J. M.; and McBurney, P. 2006. Computational representation of practical argument. Synthese 152(2):157-206.
2. Baroni, P.; Cerutti, F.; Giacomin, M.; and Guida, G. 2009. Encompassing attacks to attacks in abstract argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of ECSQARU 2009, 83-94.
3. Bench-Capon, T. J. M., and Modgil, S. 2008. Integrating object and meta-level value based argumentation. In Proc. of COMMA 2008, 240-251.
4. Bench-Capon, T. J. M. 2003. Persuasion in practical argument using value based argumentation frameworks. J. of Logic and Computation 13(3):429-448.
5. Dung, P. M. 1995. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n-person games. AIJ 77(2):321-357.
6. Girle, R.; Hitchcock, D. L.; McBurney, P.; and Verheij, B. 2003. Decision support for practical reasoning: A theoretical and computational perspective. In Reed, C., and Norman, T. J., eds., Argumentation Machines. New Frontiers in Argument and Computation, 55-84. Kluwer.
7. Modgil, S., and Fox, J. 2004. A guardian agent approach to safety in medical multi-agent systems. In Proc. of SEAMAS'04 at AAMAS 2004.
8. Modgil, S. 2006. Value based argumentation in hierarchical argumentation frameworks. In Proc. of COMMA 2006, 297-308.
9. Modgil, S. 2007. An abstract theory of argumentation that accommodates defeasible reasoning about preferences. In Proc. of ECSQARU 2007, 648-659.
10. Modgil, S. 2009. Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks. AIJ 173(9-10):901-934.
11. Walton, D. N. 1996. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.