On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks

International Journal of Intelligent Systems

Volumn 23, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1062-1093

  Amgoud, L ^a   Cayrol, C ^a   Lagasquie Schiex, M C ^a   Livet, P ^b  

^a IRIT   (France)

^b University Aix Marseille 1   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS; COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGIES; DO-MAINS; FORMAL DEFINITIONS; ONE HANDS; PROMISING APPROACHES; REPELLENT FORCES;

FORMAL LOGIC;

EID: 55349090307     PISSN: 08848173     EISSN: 1098111X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/int.20307     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Cohen PR. Heuristic reasoning about uncertainty: An artificial intelligence approach. Pitman Publisher, Marshfield, MA, USA; 1985.
2. Krause P, Ambler S, Elvang M, Fox J. A logic of argumentation for reasoning under uncertainty. Comput Intell 1995;11(1):113-131.
3. Pollock JL. Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification. Artif Intell 2001;133:233-282.
4. Dung PM. On the acceptability of arguments its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming n-person games. Artif Intell 1995;77:321-357.
5. Fox J, Parsons S. On using arguments for reasoning about values actions. In: Proc AAAI-symposium on qualitative preferences in deliberation practical reasoning, 1997. pp 55-63.
6. Parsons S. Normative argumentation qualitative probability. In: Proc first international joint conference on qualitative quantitative practical reasoning, ECSQARU-FAPR, LNAI 1244, Germany; 1997. pp 466-480.
7. Amgoud L, Maudet N, Parsons S. Arguments, dialogue negotiation. In: Horn W, editor, Proc 14th ECAI (European conference of artifical intelligence), Berlin, Germany; August 2000. pp 338-342.
8. Parsons S, Sierra C, Jennings NR. Agents that reason negotiate by arguing. J Logic Comput 1998;8(3):261-292.
9. Karacapilidis N, Papadias D. Computer supported argumentation collaborative decision making: The HERMES system. Inf Syst, 2001;26(4):259-277.
10. Gordon T, Karacapilidis N. The zeno argumentation framework. In: Proc 6th international conference on artificial intelligence law. New-York, USA: ACM Press; 1997. pp 10-18.
11. Verheij B. On the existence multiplicity of extension in dialectical argumentation. In: Benferhat S, Giunchiglia E, editors, In: Proc 9th international workshop on non-monotonic reasoning (NMR'2002); 2002. pp 416-425.
12. Amgoud L, Maudet N, Parsons S. Modelling dialogues using argumentation. In: Fourth international conference on multiagent systems (ICMAS'2000), Boston, MA, USA; July 2000. pp 31-38.
13. Amgoud L, Prade H. Reaching agreement through argumentation: A possibilistic approach. In: Proc 9th international conference on the principles of knowledge representation reasoning (KR); 2004.
14. Kraus S, Sycara K, Evenchik A. Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation, Artif Intell, 1998;104:1-69.
15. Rahwan I, Ramchurn SD, Jennings NR, McBurney P, Parsons S, Sonenberg L. Argumentation-based negotiation. Knowledge Eng Rev 2004:343-375.
16. Ramchurn SD, Jennings N, Sierra C. Persuasive negotiation for autonomous agents: A rhetorical approach. In: IJCAI workshop on computational models of natural arguments; 2003.
17. Rahwan I, Sonenberg L, Dignum F. Towards interest-based negotiation. In: Proc international joint conference on autonomous agents multi-agent systems (AAMAS); 2003.
18. Amgoud L, Cayrol C, Lagasquie-Schiex M-C. On the bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. In: Delgrande J, Schaub T, editors, Proc 10th NMR workshop (Non monotonic reasoning), Uncertainty framework subworkshop, Whistler, BC, Canada; 2004. pp 1-9.
19. Boutilier C. Towards a logic for qualitative decision theory. In: Proc 4th KR, Bonn, Germany; 1994. pp 75-86.
20. Tan SW, Pearl J. Specification evaluation of preferences under uncertainty. In: Proc 4th KR, Bonn, Germany; 1994. pp 530-539.
21. Lang J, Van der Torre L, Weydert E. Utilitarian desires. J Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 2002;5(3):329-363.
22. Benferhat S, Dubois D, Kaci S, Prade H. Bipolar representation fusion of preferences in the possibilistic logic framework. In: Proc eighth international conference on principle of knowledge representation reasoning (KR'02); 2002. pp 158-169.
23. Amgoud L, Bonnetbn J-F, Prade H. An argumentation-based approach to multiple criteria decision. In: Proc Eighth European conference on symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty (ECSQARU)-LNAI 3571, Barcelona, Spain; 2005. pp 269-280.
24. Dubois D, Fargier H. On the qualitative comparison of sets of positive negative affects. In: Proc eighth European conference on symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty (ECSQARU)-LNAI 3571, Barcelona, Spain; 2005. pp 305-316.
25. Dubois D, Prade H. A bipolar possibilitic representation of knowledge preferences its applications. In: Fuzzy logic and applications, 6th international workshop, WILF 2005, Crema, Italy, September 15-17, 2005, Revised Selected Papers, Vol 3849 of Lecture notes in computer science, Springer Publisher, Berlin, Germany; 2006. pp 1-10.
26. Amgoud L, Cayrol C. Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. J Autom Reason 2002;29:125-169.
27. Cayrol C, Lagasquie-Schiex M-C. Gradual handling of contradiction in argumentation frameworks. In: Bouchon-Meunier B, Foulloy L, Yager RR, editors, Intelligent systems for information processing: From representation to applications, chapter Reasoning, Elsevier Publisher, Amsterdam, Netherlands; 2003. pp 179-190.
28. Cayrol C, Lagasquie-Schiex M-C. Gradual acceptability in argumentation systems. In Proc 3rd CMNA (International workshop on computational models of natural argument), Acapulco, Mexique; 2003. pp 55-58.
29. Amgoud L, Prade H. Generation evaluation of different types of arguments in negotiation. In: 10th International workshop on non-monotonic reasoning, NMR'2004; 2004.
30. Amgoud L, Prade H. Using arguments for making decisions: A possibilistic logic approach. In: 20th conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, UAI'2004; 2004.
31. Dubois D, Prade H. Possibility theory as a basis for qualitative decision theory. In: 14th Inter joint conf on artificial intelligence (IJCAI'95), Montréal; August 20-25, 1995. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; pp 1924-1930.
32. Prakken H, Sartor G. Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. J App Non-Classical Logics 1997;7:25-75.
33. Jakobovits H, Vermeir D. Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks. J Logic Comput 1999;9(2):215-261.
34. Besnard P, Hunter A. A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artif Intell, 2001;128(1-2):203-235.
35. Amgoud L. Contribution à l'intégration des préférences dans le raisonnement argumentatif. PhD thesis, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse; July 1999.
36. Cayrol C, Lagasquie-Schiex M-C. Bipolarité en argumentation. Rapport de recherche 2004-07-R, Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse (I.R.I.T.), France, February 2004.
37. Amgoud L. A formal framework for handling conflicting desires. In: Proc 7th European conference on symbolic and quantitative approaches to reasoning with uncertainty, ECSQARU'2003; 2003. pp 552-563.
38. Amgoud L, Cayrol C. A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Ann Math Artif Intell 2002;34:197-216.
39. Mardi M, Cayrol C, Lagasquie-Schiex M-C. Bipolarité en argumentation: Acceptabilité et algorithmes. Rapport de recherche 2005-20-R, Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse (I.R.I.T.), France; October 2005.